Peer Review History: Application of Integrated Geophysical Methods in Groundwater Exploration in Adamawa State University, Mubi

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmet Sayar, Associate Professor, Kocaeli University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Esayas Meresa Weldamaryam, Tigray Agricultural Research Institute, Ethiopia.

(2) Karimah, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asim Abubakr Elmansour, University of Kordofan, Sudan.

(2) Balbir, NIT Kurukshetra, India.

(3) Bashab N Mahanta, GSI Training Institute, India.

(4) Ihor Hnativ, Ukrainian National Forestry University, Ukraine.

(5) Mahinaz M. Shawky, Egypt.

(6) Maryam Khalilzadeh Poshtegal, K.N.Toosi University of Technology, Iran.

(7) Radha Kishan Saran, Maharaja Ganga Singh University, India.

(8) Sandip K. Sirsat, Deogiri College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Esayas Meresa Weldamaryam, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Karimah, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Reaction of Expectation of Success and Failure Attribution among Indian College Adults

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Veronica Mîndrescu, Transylvania University of Brasov, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Neelam Rattan, San Jose State University, U.S.A.

(2) Abdu Abdullahi, Jigawa State College of Education, Nigeria.

(3) Ambale Kennedy, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Imelda M. Flores, Batangas State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Tahreem Nasir, University of the Punjab, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.13/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Neelam Rattan, U.S.A) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdu Abdullahi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ambale Kennedy, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effective Project Management Contribution on Project Success: A Review Article on the Building Sector in Ghana

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Dorothy Medza Tsuma, Management University of Africa, Kenya.

(2) Agus Mursidi, University PGRI Banyuwangi, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fatih Kasimoglu, University of Turkish Aeronautical Association, Turkey.

(2) Muhammad Marafa, Nigeria.

(3) Shakir Iqbal, Abasyn University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dorothy Medza Tsuma, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Agus Mursidi, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Claimants’ Attitudes towards Compulsory Land Acquisition and Compensation in Osogbo, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kleopatra Nikolopoulou, School of Education, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahabub Basha S, International Institute of Business Studies, India.

(2) Abhishek Rajeshkumar Mehta, Parul Institute of Computer Application, Parul University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Rajeshkumar Mehta, Parul University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Gouri Sankar Bandyopadhyay, Syamsundar College, University of Burdwan, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahabub Basha S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abhishek Rajeshkumar Mehta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Calibration and Validation of Cropgro (DSSAT 4.7) Model for Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Crop in Raipur

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Vidyagiri, Bantwal, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Iman Setiawan, Tadulako University, Indonesia.

(2) Habte Berhanu Umata, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B. Santhosh, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University (ANGRAU), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Iman Setiawan, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Habte Berhanu Umata, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Races and Biovar Characterization of Ralstonia solanacearum Causing Bacterial Wilt Disease of Potato

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Rekha, Bishop Heber College, India.

(2) Sourav Ghosh, Patanjali Research Foundation, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) David N. Gbarato, Bori Business School, Nigeria.

(2) Purnima, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Richa, Bundelkhand University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Rekha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sourav Ghosh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Weed Management Practices on Growth, Yield and Economics of Kharif Grain Sorghum

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Ioana Grozea, King Michael I of Romania” in University of Life Sciences, Timisoara, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Hallim Majidi, Badakhshan University, Afghanistan.

(2) Lachha Choudhary, SKRAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akinrinade Nathaniel Abidemi, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Badr Eldin Abdelgadir Moh. Ahmed, Kassala University, Sudan.

(3) Dhruvi Prajapati, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

(4) Mualla Keten Gokkus, Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University, Türkiye.

(5) Shittu, Emmanuel Abraham, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria.

(6) Watheq Falhi Hammood, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(7) W.L.N.S. Alwis, University of Vavuniya, Sri Lanka.

(8) Zulmardi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdul Hallim Majidi, Afghanistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lachha Choudhary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Utilization of Nutri-cereals in Dairy Industry: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepak, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) V. E. Mmuo, Federal Polytechnic Oko, Nigeria.

(3) Zubair Adeiza Bashir, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akbar Suhaji, Indonesia.

(2) Eli Zughumnaan Well, Centre For Food Technology And Research (Center), Benue State University, Nigeria.

(3) V. E. Mmuo, Federal Polytechnic Oko, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Abdul Hallim Majidi, Badakhshan University, Afghanistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepak, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (V.E. Mmuo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Zubair Adeiza Bashir, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Complicated Appendicitis: A Narrative Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Engbang Ndamba Jean Paul, Lecturer, University of Douala, Cameroon.

Reviewers:

(1) Eunice Vieira e Monteiro, Centro Hospitalar Póvoa de Varzim, Portugal.

(2) Jagadish Hansa, Radha Govind University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Reshmina Chamdni Clara Dsouza, Father Muller Medical College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Eunice Vieira e Monteiro, Portugal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jagadish Hansa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Efficacy of Burosumab Treatment for Hypophosphatemic Rickets: Systematic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Janvier Gasana, Associate Professor, Kuwait University, Kuwait.

Reviewers:

(1) B.Ramya, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College & Hospital, India.

(2) Arun P, King Institute of Preventive Medicine & Research, India,.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alina Maria Sisu, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Jeevan R Rajguru, Delight Institute of Pharmacy, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B. Ramya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arun P, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA