Peer Review History: Sero-prevalence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus among Students Undergoing Medical Examination in a Tertiary Institution

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kailash Gupta (Retd.), NIAID, NIH, USA.

(2) Prof. Akmal Nabil Ahmad El-Mazny, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Roshani Verma Gurnany, MPMSU, India.

(2) Sajida Frhan Hussain, Iraq.

(3) Nima Zangmo, Jigme Dorji Wangchuk National Referral Hospital, Bhutan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.03/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Roshani Verma Gurnany, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sajida Frhan Hussain, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nima Zangmo, Bhutan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antilipidemic and Hepatorenal Effects of Aqueous Extracts of Terminalia catappa on Streptozotocin-induced Diabetic Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. John Yahya I. Elshimali, Adjunct Professor, UCLA School of Medicine & Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, California, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Sakina Ruhi, Managements and Science University Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Shiva Prasad Mohanty, Monark University, India.

(3) Hansraj Bishnoi, Vivekanand College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.933/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sakina Ruhi, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shiva Prasad Mohanty, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hansraj Bishnoi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Addressing Challenges and Promoting Development: Strategies for Health and Wellness Industry in Ethnic Regions

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Lucy Kemboi, Institute of Open and Distance e-Learning, Moi University, Kenya.

(2) Benazzouz Touria, National School of Applied Sciences, Cadi Ayyad University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lucy Kemboi, KenyaName, Country) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Benazzouz Touria, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Mnemonics in the Teaching of Araling Panlipunan 9 on Students’ Written Assessment Scores: A One-Group Study Design

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Dennis Gamad Caballes, The National Teachers College, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Senthilkumar Meyyappan, Nalla Malla Reddy Engineering College, India.

(2) Rosane Malvestiti, Brazil.

(3) S. Rajkumar, Institute of Technology, Hawassa University, Ethiopia.

(4) Aderonmu Temitope S. B, University of Port Harcourt Demonstration Secondary School, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Senthilkumar Meyyappan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rosane Malvestiti, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S. Rajkumar, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Aderonmu Temitope S. B., Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Blended Teaching Approach in the Eyes of Filipino Teachers: A Phenomenological Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Chietra Jalota, Aravali Group of Education, India.

(2) Saira Laiquat, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chietra Jalota, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saira Laiquat, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Principal Component Analysis of Cognitive Executive Function: A Predictive Model of Academic Performance of Students in Mathematics in Secondary Schools

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Marriyam Saif, University of Management and Technology, Pakistan.

(2) Menahal, University of Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Marriyam Saif, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Menahal, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Standardization, Physico-chemical and Organoleptic Evaluation of Value added Ready-To-Serve (RTS) Beverage from Starfruit

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Susanna Phoboo, Nepal.

(2) Sofi Nurmay Stiani, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Salsabila Serang, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Susanna Phoboo, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sofi Nurmay Stiani, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In vitro Evaluation of Fungicides against Anthracnose of Betelvine (Piper betle L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rusu Teodor, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

(2) Dr. J. B. Kathiriya, Assistant Professor, Kamdhenu University, Jūnāgadh, India.

(3) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Benson Turyasingura, Kabale University, Uganda.

(2) Javaria Malik, Islamia University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Benson Turyasingura, Uganda) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Javaria Malik, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Application of Panchagavya, a Cow-based Liquid Formulation, as a Lever for Sustainable and Enhanced Vegetable Crop Production: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sudip Sengupta, Assistant Professor, Swami Vivekananda University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Seema Jat, Dayanand College, Ajmer SKNAU, India.

(2) C.M.Yadav, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Seema Jat, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (C.M.Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA