Peer Review History: Effect of Organic Nutrient Management on Growth and Yield of Foxtail Millet

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Ahmed Medhat Mohamed, Al-Naggar Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Langa Tembo, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Reviewers:

(1) Ignacio Carranza Cerda, Colegio de Postgraduados, México.

(2) Abdel-Monnem Sadalaha Khalel, Technical Agricultural College, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1)  Asmaa Mansour Al-Hakeem, Al-Karkh University of Science, Iraq.

(2)  Joy Kumar Dey, Central Agricultural University (I), India.

(3)  Lalit m. Patil, India.

(4)  Prabowo Tjitropranoto, IPB Universuty, Indonesia.

(5) Shivam Chaubey, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Endang Dwi Purbajanti, Diponegoro University, Indonesia.

(2) Justin R Nayagam, Union Christian College, India.

(3) Ummara Waheed, Muhmmad Nawaz Shareef University of Agriculture Multan, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ignacio Carranza Cerda, México) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdel-Monnem Sadalaha Khalel, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Studies on Heterozsis Breeding in Brinjal Germplasm for Growth and Yield Traits, Solanum melongena L.

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Saheb Pal, Scientist, ICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Monika Ray, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Erasmo Jose Paioli Pires, Instituto Agronômico de Campinas, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Eman Ibrahim El-Sayed Abdel-Wahab, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Josiane Pinheiro Farias, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Monika Ray, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Erasmo Jose Paioli Pires, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect Intercropping with Cowpea and Maize with Organic Manure Application on the Physiological Parameters

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Andrey Kapustin, Institute of Living Systems, Faculty of Medicine and Biology, North-Caucasus Federal University, Russia.

(2) Musyimi Ben, Egerton University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Edilza Martins Da Silva, Universidade Tecnólogica Federal Paraná, Brazil.

(2) Abdul Kadir Salam, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

(3) Juan Hernández Ävila, Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo, México.

(4) Olifir Yurii, Institute of Agriculture of Carpathian Region National Academy of Agrarian Sciences, Ukraine.

(5) Rosangela Bevitori, Brazil.

(6) Yashwant Singh, Government College, Kaladera, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Bushra Mahmood Alwan, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Massai Tchima Jacob, Cameroon.

(3) Mehari Gebreyohannes Hiben, Addis Ababa Institute of Technology (AAiT), Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

(4) Oscar Arath Grageda Cabrera, México.

(5) Zainab Shawky El-Khalifa, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Andrey Kapustin, Russia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Musyimi Ben, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Flower Forcing: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, DiSTAS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Daniela Sabina Poșta, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timișoara, Romania.

(2) Nada Hussein Al-Amer, College of Agricultural Engineering, Al-Furat University, Syria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Zeshan Haider, University of the Punjab, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Daniela Sabina Poșta, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nada Hussein Al-Amer, Syria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: International Trade, Institutional Quality and Poverty Level: A Case Study of Nigeria Economy

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ayoub Azzayani, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Pinky Roy, Sibsagar University, India.

(2) Muhammad Ali Husnain, School of Economics and Trade, Hunan University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shehar Yar Hussain, Institute of Southern Punjab Multan, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Surya Narayan Biswal, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pinky Roy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Ali Husnain, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Aspirations for Higher Education among Mahadalit Students and Strategies for Overcoming Urban Marginalities in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Saipul Wakit, Muhammadiyah University of Jember, Indonesia.

(2) Sabihee Shahid, Allama Iqbal Open University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saipul Wakit, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sabihee Shahid, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Civic Education and National Development: A Comprehensive Analysis of Zambia

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Nira Ramachandran, Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi University, India.

(2) Ninette Afi Appiah, Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Low Jie Ying, Institute of Teacher Education (Ipoh Campus), Malaysia.

(2) Vivian Minnaard, UFASTA, Argentina.

(3) Shah Murtaza Rashid Al Masud, University of Asia Pacific, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Bharti Kaushik, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nira Ramachandran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ninette Afi Appiah, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Scale to Measure the Perception of Graduates towards Student READY Programme

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Nooripoor Mehdi, Yasouj University, Iran.

(2) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Zahra Shahsavar, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Ali Hashemi, Yazd University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Verma, Manipal University Jaipur, India.

(2) Fahimah Ssemanda, University of the People, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zahra Shahsavar, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ali Hashemi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA