Peer Review History: Discover the Impact of Sulfur and Potassium on the Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Sulfur and Potassium Concentrations in Onion Bulbs

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Harish M.S, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(2) Thota Joseph Raju, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Harish M.S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Thota Joseph Raju, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrating Newcomers: Effective Models for Organizational Adoption

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Subodh Kumar, India.

(2) Seema Bhakuni, Doon Institute of Management and Research, HNBGU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kachalla Umar Mustapha, Federal University Gashua, Nigeria.

(2) Reetika Dagar Chaudhary, Gd Goenka University, India.

(3) Vijay Sehrawat, O.P. Jindal Global University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Subodh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Seema Bhakuni, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimization of a Functional Beverage Formulation Using a Constrained Mixture Design with Multiple Responses

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira, Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Sudipta Roy, Bengal College of Pharmaceutical Technology, India.

(2) Nabi Ikram, University of Blida 1, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ankur Vashi, USA.

(2) Behzad Ghasemi Parvin, Ataturk University, Turkey.

(3) Nagam Santhi Priya, Vignan Pharmacy College, India.

(4) Poornesh M, St Joseph Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sudipta Roy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nabi Ikram, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Gestalt Iconicity in EkeGusii Adjective Vowel Lengthening

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Suleyman Goksoy, University of Duzce, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Farris Imadi Fuze, Universiti Kebangsaan, Malaysia.

(2) Almustapha Wali Sambo, National Institute for Nigerian Languages, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Farris Imadi Fuze, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Almustapha Wali Sambo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Empirical Analysis on the Breeding and Feeding Behaviour of Estuarine Rice Fish Oryzias melastigma (McClelland, 1839)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, Research Professor, State University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Venugopal C.K., CUSAT, India.

(2) Sreerenjini Kamal, Catholicate College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anjam Hussain Barbhuiya, Goalpara College, India.

(2) Sahzada Hasibur Rahman, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Venugopal C.K, India)) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sreerenjini Kamal, India)) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Use of Information and Communication Technologies by the Farmers in Modernizing Agriculture at Barind Tract Area of Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Faruque As Sunny, Zhejiang University, China.

(2) Abdulraheem Abdulhakeem Oluwanisola, Federal College of Education, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Faruque As Sunny, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdulraheem Abdulhakeem Oluwanisola, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Systematic Review of Introduction Approaches in Essay Writing Studies: A Comparative Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Erfan Aslanyan-Rad, Tabatabai University, Iran.

(2) Wan Nur Aida Sakinah Wan Jusoh, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia.

(3) Md Khaled Bin Chowdhury, University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Havva Kurt Taspinar, Izmir Institute of Technology, Turkiye.

(2) Khaled Amayreh, Islamic University of Minnesota, Jordan.

(3) Zahra Shahsavar, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Erfan Aslanyan-Rad, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Wan Nur Aida Sakinah Wan Jusoh, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Md Khaled Bin Chowdhury, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Differentiated Assessment Strategies: An Assessment Practice for Diverse Learners in the Inclusive Classroom

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

(2) Dr. Shaharior Rahman Razu, Associate Professor, Khulna University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Fahad A. Salendab, Sultan Kudarat State University, Philippines.

(2) Anwar Farhan Bin Mohamad Marzaini, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Cawangan Pulau, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Rebwar Ahmed Ahmed, Zhejiang Normal University, Iraq.

(2) Angeline L. Ramos, Basilan State College, Philippines.

(3) Balasubramanian K, Manipal Globalnxt University, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.65

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fahad A. Salendab, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anwar Farhan Bin Mohamad Marzaini, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Exploration of Gender Differences in the use of English Swearwords in Vietnam

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Atila Yildirim, Necmettin Erbakan UniversityTurkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ugbede Abdul, Nigeria Defence Academy, Nigeria.

(2) Jayanthi A/P Muniandy, School of Languages, Literacies, and Translations, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

(3) Maria Shobeiry, University of Tehran, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gurpinder Kumar, University of Allahabad, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ugbede Abdul, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jayanthi A/P Muniandy, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Maria Shobeiry, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of IFRS S1 and S2 in Enhancing Transparency and Accountability of ESG Reports: A Systematic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sabeha Barzan Farhod, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Evangelia Pappa, European University of Cyprus, Greece.

(3) Mohamed, Sherif Nagy, May University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ishaq Ahmed Mohammed, Federal College of Education (Technical), Nigeria.

(2) Muthulakshmi R, Amrita Vishwavidyapeetham, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sabeha Barzan Farhod, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Evangelia Pappa, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohamed, Sherif Nagy, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA