Peer Review History: Review of Therapeutic Approach in Common Hormone Disorders

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. John Yahya I. Elshimali, Adjunct Professor, UCLA School of Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, California, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Sheeba Chellappan, Christian College of Nursing, India.

(2) Putra Agina Widyaswara Suwaryo, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gombong, Indonesia.

(3) K. Suganthy, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Institute of Medical Sciences and Health, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sarah Talib Al Mofarji, Forensic DNA Center for Research and Training, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.56/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sheeba Chellappan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Putra Agina Widyaswara Suwaryo, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (K. Suganthy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Determining the Main Causes of Neonatal Sepsis in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in Benghazi Medical Centre in 2022

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ender Durualp, Ankara University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhinav Kachare, BJGMC, India.

(2) Maryam Shehu, Bingham University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gayathri Devi C, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute (BMC&RI), Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (RGUHS), India.

(2) Priya M, AIIMS, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abhinav Kachare, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maryam Shehu, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Deciphering the Importance of Underutilized Millet Crop towards Sustainable Feed and Food Sources

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Mississipi, USA and Associate Professor, Staff Orthopedic Surgeon GV Montgomery Va Medical Center, University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Tsoata Esaie, Yaoundé 1 University, Cameroon.

(2) Eli Zughumnaan Well, Benue State University, Centre for Food Technology and Research, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tsoata Esaie, Cameroon) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eli Zughumnaan Well, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploration of Soil Particle Size Diversity and Primary Nutrient Status Across the Rice Productivity Regions of Mahabubnagar, Telangana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Distinguished Professor, Vice President, National United University (NUU), Taiwan, President of Taiwan Group on Earth Observations (TGEO), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Olaleye, Canada.

(2) Kavita Solanki, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Olaleye, Canada) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kavita Solanki, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Appraisal of Proximate Composition in Tiger Nut Yogurts and Selected Commercially Available Yogurts in Enugu, Enugu State, Nigeria: A Comparative Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Kasib Khan, Associate Professor (Tenured), University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Bala Mohan, Bharathiar University, India.

(2) Prashasti Aatre, Shanti Kumud Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gurunathan Subramanian, Indian Institute of Technology, Mandi (HP), India.

(2) Navdeep Singh Johar, SAIMS (College of Dentistry), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bala Mohan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prashasti Aatre, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Agro-technological and Health Characteristics of Sugar Cane Varieties (Saccharum officinarum L.) in Rainfall Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Maryam Pasandideh Arjmand, University of Guilan, Iran.

(2) Amitava Nayek, Trivenidevi Bhalotia College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Sri Hidayati, Lampung University, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maryam Pasandideh Arjmand, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amitava Nayek, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Flexible Pressure Sensor Based on Carbon Black/PVDF Nanocomposite

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Marquez-Linares, Nanomaterials Research Group, School of Science and Technology, Universidad Ana G. Méndez-Gurabo Campus, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Assoumou Joseph Yomanfo, Felix Houphouet Boigny University, Côte d’Ivoire.

(2) Noora Al-Qahtani, Center for Advanced Materials, Qatar University, Qatar.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Siti Norasmah Surip, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Assoumou Joseph Yomanfo, Côte d’Ivoire) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Noora Al-Qahtani, Qatar) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Climate Change Impacts on Aquaculture Systems in Key Producing Nations: Assessing Vulnerability and Proposing a Novel Adaptation Measure

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pinar Oguzhan Yildiz, Assistant Professor, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sampa Baidya, College of Fisheries, Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) Keshamma E, Maharani’s Science College for Women, Maharani Cluster University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Saba Sepahvand, University of Isfahan, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ankur Kumar Tanwar, University of Delhi, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sampa Baidya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Keshamma E, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phenotypic Characterization and in vitro Susceptibility Testing of Fungi Isolated from Madiga Bread (Local Staple Food) in Yenagoa Metropolis, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ravi Kumar Chittoria, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India.

Reviewers:

(1) M. N. Abubacker, National College, India.

(2) Bousmaha Latifa, Ibn Tofail University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. N. Abubacker, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bousmaha Latifa, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Solar Radiation Forecasting Models and their Thermodynamic Analysis in Asaba: Least Square Regression and Machine Learning Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aleksey Khlopytskyi, Associate Professor, Ukrainian State University of Chemical Technology, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Paradkar Vinayak Digambar, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

(2) Khudheyer S. Mushatet, University of Thiqar, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Istiyakhusen Anavarhusen Chauhan, SMC College of Dairy Science, Kamdhenu University, India.

(2) Tegenu Argaw Woldegiyorgis, Wollo University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Paradkar Vinayak Digambar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khudheyer S. Mushatet, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA