Peer Review History: Understanding of Organic Fertilizers in Indian Context: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Assistant Professor, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Hanaa Mohamed Sakara, Soil, Water and Environmental Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Sureka K, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hanaa Mohamed Sakara, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sureka K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Weed Management Practices on Growth, Yield and Economics of Kharif Grain Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Senior Staff Scientist & Principal Researcher, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Sivanantha J, Vasantham Agricultural Institute, India.

(2) Karthick Vikram. P, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sivanantha J, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Karthick Vikram. P, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Green Synthesis and Characterization of Silver-copper Bimetallic Nanoparticles Using Alternanthera brasiliana Stem Extract

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Richard Sawadogo, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Reviewers:

(1) Sunita Khatak, University Institute of Engg.&Technology, Kurukshetra University, India.

(2) Anshika Srivastava, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sunita Khatak, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anshika Srivastava, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in Adolescent Patients: A Single Center Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Mississipi, USA and Associate Professor, Staff Orthopedic Surgeon GV Montgomery Va Medical Center, University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Tanja Makazlieva, Institute of Pathophysiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Ss Cyril and Methodius, North Macedonia.

(2) I Gusti Ngurah Gunawan Wibisana, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia.

(3) Ikram Abdul Latif Hasan, Mustansiriyah-College of Medicine, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tanja Makazlieva, North Macedonia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (I Gusti Ngurah Gunawan Wibisana, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ikram Abdul Latif Hasan, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of Primary Healthcare Physicians in Early Detection and Continuity of Care for Cancer Patients: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Budhi Ida Bagus, Senior Lecturer, Dr. Moewardi General Teaching Hospital, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Vibhav Nigam, King George’s Medical University, India.

(2) Muhammad Safdar Baig, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Quaid-e-Azam Medical College &Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Pakistan.

(3) Shiyam Kumar, Sheffiled Teaching Hospitals, England.

(4) Mahdi Ali Abdullah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vibhav Nigam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Safdar Baig, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shiyam Kumar, England) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Mahdi Ali Abdullah, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Diversity of the Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Circulating in Fako Division, South West Region, Cameroon

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Zhiheng Zhou, Thyroid Cancer Research Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, USA.

(2) Prof. Charbell Miguel Haddad Kury, University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Cornelius Orjighjigh Ishar, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(2) Nazar Mahmoud, University Hospital Limerick, Ireland.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Cornelius Orjighjigh Ishar, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nazar Mahmoud, Ireland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Establishment and Evaluation of Soil Fertility Gradient on the Basis of Sorghum Fodder Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Post-Harvest Soil Test Values

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Umesh Kumar, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Gill Ammara, Henan Polytechnic University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Umesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gill Ammara, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutrient Release Pattern and Soil Enzyme Activities in Calcareous and Non-calcareous Soils as Influenced by PROM

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Seva Nayak, Senior Scientist, ICAR-Indian Institute of Millet Research (IIMR), Hyderabad, India.

(2) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Irshad Ali Saudagar, ICFRE-TFRI, India.

(2) Aishwarya S, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Irshad Ali Saudagar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aishwarya S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Growth Performance of Different Lemongrass (Cymbopogon flexuosus) Varieties under an Acacia mangium-Based Agroforestry System in the Chhattisgarh Plains

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Waqas Iqbal, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

(2) Emad Saleh Hamed, Desert Research Center, Egypt.

(3) Folake Akinbohun, Rufus Giwa Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.56/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Waqas Iqbal, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Emad Saleh Hamed, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Folake Akinbohun, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Drinking Water Quality in Hospitals: A Study from Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor and Hod, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Prachi S. Patel, CAM Institute of Allied Health Sciences & Technology, Bhaikaka University, India.

(2) Zabihollah Yousefi, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prachi S. Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zabihollah Yousefi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA