Peer Review History: Emotional Intelligence Affect EFL Teachers’ Teaching Motivation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vlasta Hus, Associate Professor, University of Maribor, Koroška cesta 160, Slovenia.

Reviewers:

(1) Fossung Noutock Gilbert, University of Buea, Cameroon.

(2) Najeeb us Saqlain, NED University of Engineering & Technology, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fossung Noutock Gilbert, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Najeeb us Saqlain, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Giant Peritoneal Loose Body with Its Snowball Effect – A Rare Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Consultant Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgeon, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Krishna Ramavath, AIIMS, India.

(2) Rangarajan Muthukumaran, Bahamas.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Janvier Nzayikorera, Rwanda.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Krishna Ramavath, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rangarajan Muthukumaran, Bahamas) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Rare Case of Adult Onset IgA Vasculitis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, Medical University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Mejbahuddin Mia, Khwaja Yunus Ali Medical College & Hospital, Bangladesh.

(2) A. Suresh, Meenakshi Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, India.

(3) Jenish Rajma, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammed Mejbahuddin Mia, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A. Suresh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jenish Rajma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economic Evaluation of Mung Bean (Vigna radiata) Intercrop within Malabar Neem (Melia dubia) Based Agroforestry System in Semi-arid Region of Bundelkhand, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Yadvendra Pal Singh, Lovely Professional University, India.

(2) Agegnehu Kitanbo Yoshe, Arba Minch University, Ethiopia.

(3) Shahrzad Khatibi, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yadvendra Pal Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Agegnehu Kitanbo Yoshe, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shahrzad Khatibi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Preparation, Characterization and Investigation of Extraction Efficiency of m- and p- Substituted Hydroxamic Acids with Some Metals

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bikram Keshari Das, Assistant Professor, Kalinga Institute of Social Sciences, Deemed to be University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Pham Van Chung, Vietnam.

(2) Zubida Yousaf, LCWU, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ibrahima Sory Sow, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Belgium.

(2) Bablu Hira Mandal, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh.

(3) Meena Kumari, Himachal Pradesh University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pham Van Chung, Vietnam) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zubida Yousaf, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Public Perception and Willingness to Pay for Progari in the Bono and Greater Accra Regions of Ghana

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Akshay F Madiwalar, College of Forestry Sirsi,  University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, India.

(2) Sukanta Sarkar, Gambella University, Ethiopia.

(3) Rizwan Kazim, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Akshay F Madiwalar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sukanta Sarkar, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rizwan Kazim, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Financial Literacy among the Students of Junagadh Agricultural University

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

(2) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Shilpa Narang, JIMS-JCC, India.

(2) Omaima Eltahir Babikir Mohamed, School of Business, Unversiti Tun Abdul Razak, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashutosh Kumar Singh, AKS University Satna, India.

(2) Mitesh J. Patel, Sankalchand Patel University, India.

(3) Nurazleena Ismail, Universiti Teknologi MARA Kelantan, Malaysia.

(4) Rukmini Murugesan, Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

(5) Akua Peprah-yeboah, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

(6) Pradeep K. Gupta, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shilpa Narang, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Omaima Eltahir Babikir Mohamed, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal_Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Emigration and It’s Comparative Economic Impact on Households: A Study of Northern Kerala with a Focus on Malappuram District

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Bishnu Lamichhane, TPO Nepal, Nepal.

(2) Govinda Bahadur K.C, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Noushad AP, Government Arts and Science College for Women, India.

(2) Lidija Madžar, Alfa BK University, Republic of Serbia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bishnu Lamichhane, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Govinda Bahadur K.C, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comparative Study of Decadal Labour Share for Indian Manufacturing Industries

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Anita Prasad, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, India.

(2) Sam Rex Sagoe Babo, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anita Prasad, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sam Rex Sagoe Babo, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (Anita Prasad, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploration and Practice of Teaching Methods for College Mathematics Courses Based on Flipped Classroom

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Alexandru Trifu, “Petre Andrei” University of Iasi, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Suvendu Ray, University of Kalyani, India.

(2) Nidhi Jhawar, IPS Academy, IBMR, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Patma Sopamena, IAIN Ambon, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suvendu Ray, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nidhi Jhawar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA