Editor(s):
Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
The peer review history will be available very soon.
Editor(s):
Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
The peer review history will be available very soon.
Editor(s):
(1) Prof. Ioana Grozea, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timisoara, Romania.
(2) Dr. Champa Lal Khatik, Assistant Professor, Agricultural Research Station, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, India.
Reviewers:
(1) Prayagbhai Golakiya, India.
(2) Mariam Munir, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prayagbhai Golakiya, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mariam Munir, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA
Editor(s):
(1) Prof. Brij Bhushan Tewari, University of Guyana, Guyana.
Reviewers:
(1) Namrata Kahar, Hemchand University, India.
(2) Syed Awais Hussain Shah, University of Gujrat, Pakistan.
(3) Sanghadeep Siddharth Ukey, Lokmanya Tilak Mahavidyalaya, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, India.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Namrata Kahar, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Syed Awais Hussain Shah, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sanghadeep Siddharth Ukey, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Akbar Azizifar, Associate Professor, School of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran.
Reviewers:
(1) Bashir Idris, Federal College of Education, Nigeria.
(2) Waode Yunia Silviariza, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia.
(3) Adji W. S. Minadja, University of Lampung, Indonesia.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bashir Idris, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Waode Yunia Silviariza, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Adji W. S. Minadja, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.
Reviewers:
(1) Ayush Kumar Garg, Dr. Sarvapalli Radhakrishanan Rajasthan Ayurved University, India.
(2) Ajay Ramdas Nannar, Amrutvahini Institute of Pharmacy, India.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ayush Kumar Garg, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ajay Ramdas Nannar, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Tzasna Hernandez Delgado, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico.
Reviewers:
(1) Mochabo Kennedy Miyoro, Egerton University, Kenya.
(2) Aiman Ashraf, Shere Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, India.
(3) Julio Cesar Queiroz Penha, Fluminense Federal University, Brazil.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.17/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mochabo Kennedy Miyoro, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aiman Ashraf, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Julio Cesar Queiroz Penha, Brazil) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Center for Integrative Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.R. China.
Reviewers:
(1) Chintada Vivek, Sri Venkateswara University, India.
(2) Karikpo Letan Popsaana, Nigeria.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chintada Vivek, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Karikpo Letan Popsaana, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.
Reviewers:
(1) Hajar Soleimani, Shiraz University, Iran.
(2) Shraddha Karcho, JNKVV, India.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hajar Soleimani, Iran) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shraddha Karcho, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Editor(s):
(1) Prof. Ayoub Azzayani, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco.
(2) Dr. Chan Sok Gee, Associate Professor, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.
Reviewers:
(1) Zmarialy Yousufi, Institute of Management in Kerala, University of Kerala, India.
(2) Iryna Mihus, Scientific Center of Innovative Research, Estonia.
(3) Vladimir Gorgadze, School of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Russia.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.6/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zmarialy Yousufi, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Iryna Mihus, Estonia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vladimir Gorgadze, Russia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Re-Review report_3_v1 (Vladimir Gorgadze, Russia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.
Reviewers:
(1) Clement Gyeabour Kyere, Seventh-day Adventist College of Education, Ghana.
(2) Mohamed Idris Alshelmani, University of Benghazi, Libya.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Clement Gyeabour Kyere, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohamed Idris Alshelmani, Libya) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA