Peer Review History: Gender Dynamics and Economic Impacts: The Feminization of Indian Agriculture in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rohaiza Rokis, Associate Professor, International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Rukmani Adhikari, Nepal.

(2) Vasanthi Reena Williams, Vidya Vikas Institute of Engineering & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) H S Behera, Lovely Professional University, India.

(2) Funmi Blessing Nkwelle, University of Benin, Nigeria.

(3) Susan Anita Andrew, Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

(4) Kalipadha Debnath, Mangalayatan University, India.

(5) Sofia Ahmed Sait, Loyola Academy Degree and PG College, India.

(6) Lekha Kasmir, APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rukmani Adhikari, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vasanthi Reena Williams, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutrient Enhancing and Flesh Quality Improvement in Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Fed Dietary Sweet Potato (Ipomoa batatas) Leaves Aqueous Extract

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Giri, Prabhat Kumar College, India.

(2) Imtiaz Kashani, Centre of Excellence in Marine Biology, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abhishek Giri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Imtiaz Kashani, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development and Quality Evaluation of Cookies from Lima Bean and Emmer Wheat

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Chidimma Linda Ifeh, Montana State University, United States.

(2) Vinay G M, Anand Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Monika Stojanova, North Macedonia.

(2) Mohamed Rashad Gouda Youssif, Food Technology Research Institute – Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chidimma Linda Ifeh, United States) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vinay G M, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effects of Additional Tuna Madihang Bone Fish Treatment on the Growth of Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) in Biofloc Pond in Ternate City North Maluku, Indonesia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Saima Tehseen, Assistant Professor, GC Women University Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Aman Kumar, Ranchi University, India.

(2) M. Rrajan, The Gandhigram Rural Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aman Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Rrajan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Peer Review History: Extension of Shelf Life of Roasted Duck by combination of Vacuum Packaging and Low Temperature Storage

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nguyen Van Toan, School of Biotechnology, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Reviewers:

(1) Niraj Kumar Prajapati, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, India.

(2) Nada Khaled Ali, Benha University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Birhanu Zeleke Tilinti, Arba Minch University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Niraj Kumar Prajapati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nada Khaled Ali, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: On Dual Hyperbolic Generalized Woodall Numbers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tatyana A. Komleva, Odessa State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Fausto Jarquin Zarate, Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México, México.

(2) John Robinson P, Bishop Heber College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Simon Joseph, University of Bahr El- Ghazal, South Sudan.

(2) Mohammed Aboud Kadhim, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fausto Jarquin Zarate, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (John Robinson P,India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Farm to Tourists: Exploring the Challenges and Development Strategies for Agro-tourism in Kurupetta Division in Sri Lanka

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. John M. Polimeni, Associate Professor, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ha Van Trung, Wuhan University, China.

(2) Anil Kumar Chikatimarla, AG & SG Siddhartha Degree College of Arts & Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ha Van Trung, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anil Kumar Chikatimarla, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antibiogram of Bacteria Isolated in Raw Milk Sold in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chamari Hettiarachchi, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Reviewers:

(1) Fakhruzzaman, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Bangladesh.

(2) Kunal Batabyal, WBUAFS, India.

(3) Abdur Rahman, Gono Bishwabidyalay, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fakhruzzaman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kunal Batabyal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abdur Rahman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Preliminary Analysis of the Feeding Habits of Two Species of the Genera Mobula, Mobula japanica (Müller & Henle, 1841) and Mobula tarapacana (Philippi, 1892) in the Coastal Waters of Côte d’Ivoire, Gulf of Guinea

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rahul Kumar Jaiswal, National Institute of Hydrology, WALMI Campus, Bhopal, India.

(2) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Rima Mohdeb, University of Jijel, Algeria.

(2) Samia Mohsen El-Mahdy, National Institution of Oceanography and Fisheries, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rima Mohdeb, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samia Mohsen El-Mahdy, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Tillage and Weed Management on Maize (Zea mays L.) Yield and Nutrient Uptake

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Nodiet Melody Dahou, University of Abomey, Benin.

(2) Roohul Amin, Bacha Khan University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nodiet Melody Dahou, Benin) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Roohul Amin, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA