Peer Review History: Analysis of TE Variations on SNR and CNR Values in Lumbar MRI T2WI Sequences at Bali Mandara Regional General Hospital

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Diana Cecilia Tapia-Pancardo, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Tlalnepantla, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Amal Hameed Khaleel, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(2) Bhavani K, Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amal Hameed Khaleel, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bhavani K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Protective Effect of Raphanus sativus Using by Phytochemical and Antiulcer Activity by Aspirin Induced Gastric Ulcer

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Tapan Kumar Mahato, Sardar Patel College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Anand M Ingale, Blde Du’s Shri B M Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Center, India.

(3) N Yella Subbaiah, JNTUA, Santhiram College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tapan Kumar Mahato, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anand M Ingale, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (N Yella Subbaiah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Phosphorus Fertilization and Zinc Spraying on Productivity of Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kosev Valentin, Associate Professor, Institute of Forage Crops, Bulgaria.

(2) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Kareem Hussein AL-Taii, Al-Mussaib Technical College, AL-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Harish M.S, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(3) Mukesh Kumar Singh, Tilka Manjhi Agriculture College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Kareem Hussein AL-Taii, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Harish M.S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mukesh Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effectiveness of Drone-Assisted Thiamethoxam12.6% + Lambda-Cyhalothrin 9.5% ZC against Pink Bollworm (Pectinophora gossypiella) in Cotton

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Brain Research Center, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Gyan Prakash Morya, Vital Biotech Research & Training Institute, India.

(2) Jonnala Subba Reddy, Lakireddy Bali Reddy College of Engineering, India.

(3) Suman Devi, CCS HAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.06/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gyan Prakash Morya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jonnala Subba Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Suman Devi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Soil Erosion Risk from Runoffs under Arid and Semi-arid Climate Zones in Africa

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Assistant professor, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ihor Hnativ, Ukrainian National Forestry University, Ukraine.

(2) Djalilova Gulnora, National University of Uzbekistan, Uzbekistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ihor Hnativ,Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Djalilova Gulnora, Uzbekistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Sources and Levels of Zinc on the Nutrient Content, Uptake and Fertility Status of Wheat

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Hashem Aram, Shiraz University, Iran.

(2) Sundus Malik, Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, The University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hashem Aram, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sundus Malik, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Diversity in Indian Mustard [Brassica juncea L. Czern & Coss.] Genotypes for Yield & Its Attributing Traits under Terai Agro-climatic Zone of West Bengal, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Bharti O.P, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

(2) Akm Quamruzzaman, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bharti O.P, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Akm Quamruzzaman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Survey of Parasitic Nematodes Associated with Cotton in Burkina Faso

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alessandro Buccolieri, University of Salento, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Tarekegn Mengistu, Dilla University, Ethiopia.

(2) Loukrakpam Bina Chanu, Manipur University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tarekegn Mengistu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Loukrakpam Bina Chanu, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Using Plant Fiber on The Properties of Concrete

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kumar Kotturi, Assistant Professor, Vidya Jyothi Institute of Technology (Autonomous), Hyderabad, India.

Reviewers:

(1) D. Suresh, VSB Engineering College, India.

(2) Thuany Espírito Santo de Lima, Federal Center for Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca, Brazil.

(3) NA Abdulla, University of Salahaddin, Iraq.

(4) Zainab Sabah Rasoul, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (D. Suresh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Thuany Espírito Santo de Lima, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (NA Abdulla, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Zainab Sabah Rasoul, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Continuous Data Quality Improvement in Enterprise Data Governance: A Model for Best Practices and Implementation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Elangovan, Assistant Professor,B.S.Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Olabisi Olajide, University of Bradford, United Kingdom.

(2) Dorcas Folasade Oyebode, Purdue University Northwest, United States.

(3) Rianat Abbas, Baylor University, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmed Olabisi Olajide, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dorcas Folasade Oyebode, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rianat Abbas, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA