Peer Review History: Biliary Atresia: GGT vs Histopathology as Diagnostic Tool

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jongwha Chang, Texas Woman’s University, College of Business, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ulfat Amin, Islamic University of Science and Technology, India.

(2) C. Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, Universidad de Guadalajara, México.

(3) Raashid Hamid, Kashmir Institute of Medical Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abiyie Zeleke  Alem, Debre Markos University and Debre Markos Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia.

(2) Anuragsingh Chandel, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(3) Mariam  Akhrif, children’s hospital, Morocco.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ulfat Amin, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (C. Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Raashid Hamid, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Phenomenological Approach to Multi-Higgs Production at High Energy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Khalil Kassmi, Professor, Mohamed Premier University, Morocco.

(2) Dr. Jelena Purenovic, Associate Professor, Kragujevac  University, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Gerald B. Cleaver, Baylor University, USA.

(2) Godfrey Ikeozahu Ojerheghan, University of Ilorin, Nigeria.

(3) Vipin Jain, Csir-national Physical Laboratory, India.

(4) Hova Hoavo, University of Kara, Togo.

(5) Giorgio Sonnino, Universite’ Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Belgium.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) André Felippe Vieira da Cunha, Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil.

(2) Jorge Octavio Virues Delgadillo, Universidad Veracruzana, México.

(3) Luis Augusto TrevisanUniversidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Brasil.

(4) Shashank Sharma, Kalinga University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Gerald B. Cleaver, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Godfrey Ikeozahu Ojerheghan, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Vipin Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Hova Hoavo, Togo) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_5 (Giorgio Sonnino, Belgium) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Computational Translation Features of Chinese Translation of Emily Dickinson’s Poetry: A Comparison of Kang Yanbin’s and Wang Jinhua’s Translations

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Endang Sulistianingsih, Universitas Pancasakti Tegal, Indonesia.

(2) Cynthia Whissell, Laurentian University, Canada.

(3) P Moodley, South Africa.

(4) Robyn Lee Najar, Sichuan University, China.

(5) Odingowei M. Kwokwo, Niger Delta University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Clara Herlina Karjo, Bina Nusantara University, Indonesia.

(2) Zhang Youwen, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics Dongfang College, China.

(3) Lok Raj Sharma, Makawanpur Multiple Campus, Nepal.

(4) Baohua Dong, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, China.

(5) Gang Xu, Inner Mongolian Minzu University, China.

(6) Omar A. Sheikh Al-Shabab, International University for Science and Technology, Syria.

(7) Rajat, Chitkara University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Endang Sulistianingsih, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Cynthia Whissell, Canada) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (P Moodley, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Robyn Lee Najar, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_5 (Odingowei M. Kwokwo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Spinal Anesthesia on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sevgul Donmez, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Elshymaa A. Abdelnaby, Veterinary Medicine Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Xinxing Wu, University of Kentucky, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhawana Rastogi, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, India.

(2) Vibhu Krishnan Viswanathan, Univ of Calgary, Canada.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Elshymaa A. Abdelnaby, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Xinxing Wu, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: First Trimester Placental Volume and Uterine Artery Doppler in Pregestational Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Pregnant Women

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Professor, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Nicolae Gica, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

(2) Sreelatha S, RGUHS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nicolae Gica, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sreelatha S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Hot Fomentation on Plasma HSP70 Levels and Body Temperature

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, School of Life Science, Xuzhou Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Vivek Chauhan, DIBNS , HNBGU, India.

(2) Fatemeh Rahimi, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Madhulika Singh, Maharishi University of Information Technology, India.

(2) Vikram Singh, RKDF Dental College & Research Centre, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Vivek Chauhan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Fatemeh Rahimi , Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Small and Medium Scale Enterprises on Economic Development of Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Satinder Bhatia, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Dustin Tahisin Gómez Rodríguez, Colombia.

(2) Hadouga Hassiba, Constantine University 2, Algeria.

(3) Elvy Maria Manurung, Parahyangan Catholic University (UNPAR), Indonesia.

(4) Yasin Kerem Gümüş, Sakarya University, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chinedu Jonathan Ndubuisi, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(2) Bright Onime, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(3) Elijah Kutogichiga Aloriwor, Tamale Islamic Science, Ghana.

(4) Jonas Yomboi, University for Development Studies, Ghana.

(5) Khalis Hasan Yousif Al-Naser, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(6) Khaled Kalam, Shandong University, Bangladesh.

(7) Kuswanto, Jambi University, Indonesia.

(8) Malgit Amos Akims, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

(9) Mariana, Indonesian.

(10) Mojtaba Sedighi, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(11) Muhammad Maladi SE, STIE Indonesia Banjarmasin, Indonesia.

(12) Nemer Badwan, Palestine Economic Policy Research Institute – MAS, State of Palestine.

(13) Omaliko Emeka Leonard, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(14) Pema Wangchuk, Royal University of Bhutan, Bhutan.

(15) Muhammad Usman, Abban Gafai Education Resource Centre, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Dustin Tahisin Gómez Rodríguez, Colombia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hadouga Hassiba, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Elvy Maria Manurung, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Yasin Kerem Gümüş, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Isolation, Identification and Characterization of Potential Probiotics from Fermented Food Products

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vijayakhader, Professor, Former Dean, Acharya N. G. Ranga agricultural University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Evans Frimpong Boateng, College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, China.

(2) Shilpi Kerketta, ICAR- IARI, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Olusegun Oshibanjo, University of Jos, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Evans Frimpong Boateng, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shilpi Kerketta, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge of Farmers towards Use of ICT for Empowerment of Rural Women in Dehradun District of Uttarakhand

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Getachew Etana Gemechu, Ethiopian Institute  of Agriculture Research, Ethiopia.

(2) Sushopti Gawade, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhabani Shankar Dash, Dr. Ambedkar Memorial Institute of IT & Management Science, India.

(2) Getachew Etana Gemechu, Ethiopian Institute  of Agriculture Research, Ethiopia.

(3) Mohamed Nasr Saeed, Applied CollegeBenha University, King Faisal University, KSA.

(4) Yogesh Kumar Agarwal, Forest Research Centre for Eco-rehabilitation, India.

(5) Yasin Esmael, Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Getachew Etana Gemechu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sushopti Gawade, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Tree Species Diversity in a Semi-Conserved Beach Forest in Southern Philippines

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jorge Castro Mejia, Universidad autonoma metropolitana xochimilco, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Kolawole Idowu, Advanced Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Laboratory, Nigeria.

(2) M. en C. Jazmín Terán Martínez, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, México.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Angela Cuttitta, Institute of Mediterranean Studies ISMed, Italy.

(2) Jimmy Morales-Márquez, Spain.

(3) Koushik Sadhukhan, National Centre for Coastal research (NCCR), India.

(4) Sohaib Naseer, Nottingham Trent University, United Kingdom.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kolawole Idowu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (M. en C. Jazmín Terán Martínez, México) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA