Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Sahar Ghazi Imran, Baghdad University, Iraq.

(2) Nermin Hrnčić, Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Bosnia and Hercegovina.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sahar Ghazi Imran, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nermin Hrnčić, Bosnia and Hercegovina) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jongwha Chang, University of Texas, College of Pharmacy, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Jun Kobayashi, University of Kochi, Japan.

(2) Snigdha Pattnaik, Siksha O Anusandhan University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Balaji. V, Vellore Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Debajit Kalita, IIT Guwahati, India.

(3) Juluri Krishna Dutta Tejaswi, India.

(4) Nawal Fadhil Abbas, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(5) Nibu G Philip, Baba Moni Ji Maharaj College of Nursing, India.

(6) Poonam Agrawal, Sharda University, India.

(7) Suharmanto, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia.

(8) Younes Parvaz, University of Siena, Italy.

(9) Nagaraja Prasad s., Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Jun kobayashi, Japan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Snigdha pattnaik, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  John Yahya I. Elshimali, UCLA School of Medicine & Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Fowziya M. Ali, University of Benghazi, Libya.

(2) S Kalyani Surya Dhana Lakshmi, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bibinagar Hyderabad, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Fowziya M. Ali, Libya) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (S Kalyani Surya Dhana Lakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Barkat Ali Khan, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Parag Gangurde, Bharati vIdyapeeth University, India.

(2) Amitha Ramesh, NITTE deemed to be University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Vildan Celiksoy, Cardiff University, United Kingdom.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Parag Gangurde, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Amitha Ramesh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Kagne Suresh Raghunathrao, Badrinarayan Barwale Mahavidyalaya, India.

(2) Eliene Penha Rodrigues Pereira, Estadual de Campinas – Unicamp, Brazil.

(3) Hugo Calixto Fonseca, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.25/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kagne Suresh Raghunathrao, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Eliene Penha Rodrigues Pereira, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Hugo Calixto Fonseca, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Payal Arvind Kasat, AIIMS Nagpur, India.

(2) Bhupender Singgh Negi, Kerala University, India.

(3) Jigyasa Passey, Hamdard Institute of Medical Science & Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Payal Arvind Kasat, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Bhupender Singgh Negi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Jigyasa Passey, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanjay G.Thete, Rural Dental College,Pravara Institute Of Medical Sciences (Du)Loni, India.

(2) Vinayak Joshi, The Ohio State University USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chee Eng LEE, St. Joseph’s Hospice, United Kingdom.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sanjay G.Thete, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Vinayak Joshi, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Fauziatul Fajaroh, State University Of Malang, Indonesia.

(2) Aji Udhaya. P, Holy Cross College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Fauziatul Fajaroh, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Aji Udhaya. P, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Nasser Mustapha, Senior Lecturer, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad.

Reviewers:

(1) Ester Rutoro, Reformed Church University, Zimbabwe.

(2) James Sika, Maseno University, Kenya.

(3) Fitri Nur Mahmudah, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ester Rutoro, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (James Sika, Kenya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Fitri Nur Mahmudah, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Amit Hemraj Patil, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University Dental College and Hospital Navi Mumbai, India.

(2) Farzeen Tanwir, Bahria University Dental College, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) E.Gayathri Priyadharshini, Vivekananda Dental College for Women, India.

(2) Hema P, Sri Venkateswara Dental College, India.

(3) Meena Anand K, Manipal University College Malaysia, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Amit Hemraj Patil, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Farzeen Tanwir, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA