Peer Review History: Drought Stress Screening in Backcross Inbred Lines of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) at Germination and Seedling Stage

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) V. N. Kapadia, Anand Agricultural University, India.

(2) Minfeng Tang, University of Alberta, Canada.

(3) Giovanni Guimaraes Landa, Centro Universitario Vale do Cricare, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Blanca Nieves Lara Chávez, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Mexico.

(2) Elton Ndlovu, Lupane State University, Zimbabwe.

(3) Yashwant Singh, Government College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V. N. Kapadia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Minfeng Tang, Canada) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Giovanni Guimaraes Landa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unveiling Genetic Diversity in Grain Amaranth through K-Means Clustering and Principal Component Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, DiSTAS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Sheelamary Sebastiar, ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, India.

(2) Ali Abdullah Ali Majrashi, Taif University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

(3) Olabisi E. Olajire, National Centre for Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sheelamary Sebastiar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ali Abdullah Ali Majrashi, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Olabisi E. Olajire, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Contribution of PGPRs to Plant Growth: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Hafiz Tanvir Ahmad, Institute of Soil and Water Resources, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

(2) Mona Fekry Ghazal, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(3) Bidisha Borgohain, Biswanath College of Agriculture, Assam Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Tanimu Bala, Kano University Of Science And Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Adarsh Kumar Meena, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(3) Shalini Pillai P, Kerala Agricultural University, College of Agriculture, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hafiz Tanvir Ahmad, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mona Fekry Ghazal, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bidisha Borgohain, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Standardization of Assay Method of Urease Activity in Inceptisol

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravindra Sachan, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Chairil Anwar Siregar, National Institute of Research and Innovation, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravindra Sachan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chairil Anwar Siregar, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Total Antioxidant Capacity of Three Selected Plants in Guyana

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Distinguished Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Jayesh Ranjit Patil, India.

(2) Ali Raza Kashif, International Islamic University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jayesh Ranjit Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ali Raza Kashif, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Waterlogging and Mitigation Strategies for Alanda Micro Watershed Using Remote Sensing in Akola District of Vidarbha Region, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Xiao-Feng Sun, Associate Professor, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Medani P. Bhandari, Akamai University, USA.

(2) K. Katturajan, School of Sciences, Tamil Nadu Open University, India.

(3) Fekede Terefe Gemeda, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Saima Ahmad, Bangladesh Open University, Bangladesh.

(2) Ashok Kumar Sahoo, India.

(3) Mahabub Alam, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(4) Medani P. Bhandari, Akamai University, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Medani P. Bhandari, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. Katturajan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Fekede Terefe Gemeda, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Major Abiotic Factors on the Population Trend of Tetranychusurticae Koch on Okra at Samastipur, Bihar, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Distinguished Professor/Vice President, National United University (NUU), Taiwan, President of Taiwan Group on Earth Observations (TGEO), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ishan Tiwari, Amity University, India.

(2) Manoj Kumar Jena, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Poland.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Kumar Yadav, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agricultural & Technology, India.

(2) P.Manikandan, India.

(3) Ravi Kumar Rajak, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, India.

(4) S. Samba Thkumar, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(5) Zemenu Fentahun, Southern Ethiopia Agricultural Research Institute (SEARI), Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ishan Tiwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manoj Kumar Jena, Poland) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Land Configuration and Rainfall on Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br. under Saline Irrigation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Abu Ktellah St., Hebron, Hebron, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Tarini Prasad Das, Odisha University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

(2) Sunil Kumar Prajapati, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anjali Joshi, ICFRE-Arid Forest Research Institute, India.

(2) Vasanthkumar SS, Horticultural College And Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tarini Prasad Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sunil Kumar Prajapati, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Using Soluble CD38 to Overcome Daratumumab Interference in Pretransfusion Compatibility Testing

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Davina Hijam, Associate Professor, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Vinoth R, Thanthai Roever College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Arinze Favour Anyiam, Igbinedion University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arooj Kanwal, University of Chakwal, Pakistan.

(2) Farkad Hawas Musa, University Of Anbar, Iraq.

(3) Haider Mohammed Majeed, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(4) Magesh Sachidanandam, King Institute Of Preventive Medicine And Research, Chennai, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vinoth R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arinze Favour Anyiam, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ethnobotany, Phytochemistry, Pharmacology and Therapeutic Potential of Su‘ad Kūfī (Cyperus rotundus L.): An Insight

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Prem K. Ramasamy, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.

(2) Prof. Marcello Iriti, Milan State University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Naziya Ashpak Tamboli, DBATU, India.

(2) Gamal Saad EL-Hadidy, Food Technology Research Centre, Egypt.

(3) Shaiphali Saxena, Government Post Graduate College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Naziya Ashpak Tamboli, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gamal Saad EL-Hadidy, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shaiphali Saxena, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA