Peer Review History: Lengths and Content Variation of Oil Palm Broom Fibre (OPBF) and Lime on the Physico-mechanical Properties of Compressed Earth Blocks

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Yong X. Gan, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Vishal Kumar, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, United States.

(2) Kagonbe Pagna Bertin, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Atique Ishrak Anik, Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology, Bangladesh.

(2) Besukal Befikadu Zewudie, Jimma University, Institute Of Technology, Ethiopia.

(3) Katke S.D, MIT College of Food Technology, India.

(4) V.V.N Sarath, Pragati Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vishal Kumar, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kagonbe Pagna Bertin, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Soil Moisture through Climatic Variables Using Remote Sensing Data in Semi-Arid Sokoto State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Distinguished Professor/Vice President, National United University (NUU), Taiwan, President of Taiwan Group on Earth Observations (TGEO), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sumati Prabhakar, IIIT Hyderabad, India.

(2) Jeykumar R K C, Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Anna University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sumati Prabhakar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jeykumar R K C, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Modeling and Simulation of Electric and Magnetic Fields of a Short Dipole Antenna at Low Frequencies in the Far Field

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Elangovan, Assistant Professor, School of Electrical and Communication Sciences, B. S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Javeed Ahammed, Narasaraopeta Engineering College, India.

(2) Pravin Latane, Savatribai Phule Pune University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Koushick Venkatesh, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(2) Siti Harliza Binti Mohd Razali, Polytechnic Sultan Azlan Shah, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Javeed Ahammed, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pravin Latane, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services of Coastal Area of Kinondoni District, Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Saubhagya Silwal, Salem College, USA.

(2) Arnold Mahonko Banda, Mukuba University, Zambia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akshay F Madiwalar, College of Forestry Sirsi,  University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Justus E Eregae, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT), Kenya.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saubhagya Silwal, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arnold Mahonko Banda, Zambia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimizing Bt Cotton Yields with Canopy Management in Rainfed Environments

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dalong Guo, College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Henan University of Science and Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) C. Sai Durga, Annamalai University, India.

(2) P. Reddypriya, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (C. Sai Durga, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P. Reddypriya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Studies on Path Coefficient Analysis and Correlation to Evaluate the Relationships between Yield and Its Components in Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Dasari Sravani, Aditya College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) A. Anisha, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dipayan Sarkar, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(2) MS Jangra, India.

(3) Thota Soujanya, SR University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dasari Sravani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A. Anisha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Persistence and Dissipation Kinetics of λ-Cyhalothrin in Okra Fruits and Soil

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Tejaswi Boyapati, South Dakota State University, United States.

(2) Prudence Agnandji, Mzuzu University, Malawi.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lema Yadeta Gemachu, Wallaga University, Ethiopia.

(2) Muhammad Nauman Hanif, MNS University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

(3) Sojwal Shinde, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tejaswi Boyapati, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prudence Agnandji, Malawi) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Coconut Growers: Challenges Faced and Solutions Proposed

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dalong Guo, College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Henan University of Science and Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Aladin P. Repaso, Philippines.

(2) Shirly O. Agcaoili, Cagayan State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aladin P. Repaso, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shirly O. Agcaoili, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Detection of Hemodynamic Events during the Implementation of a Novel Indigenous Tele ICU System-An Observational Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatima Mubarak, Aga Khan University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Joko Tri Atmojo, Mamba’ul Ulum Surakarta School of Health and Sciences, Indonesia.

(2) Lowlesh Nandkishor Yadav, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Vinod Nikhra, Bansal Hospital, India.

(2) Rachana Mishra, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Joko Tri Atmojo, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lowlesh Nandkishor Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effective Management of COVID-19 in Nigeria: Investigating the Impact of Treatment and Prevention

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Ramjeet Singh Yadav, Dr. Rammanohar Lohia Avadh University, India.

(2) Sofia Liossi, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens General Hospital, Greece.

(3) Sanjib Ghosh, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Tchioffo Boris Rosmes, University Of Yaounde 1, Cameroon.

(2) Ubaid Asif Farooqui, Maharishi University of Information Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ramjeet Singh Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sofia Liossi, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sanjib Ghosh, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA