Editor(s):

(1) Prof. G. Anusha, Head, KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) R. Venkata Krishnaiah, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

(2) Abhijeet Das, C.V. Raman Global University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R. Venkata Krishnaiah, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abhijeet Das, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Center for Integrative Conservation & Yunnan Key Laboratory for Conservation of Tropical Rainforests & Asian Elephant, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Shaimaa Fouad Mohammed Hegazi El Bayar, Mansoura University, Egypt.

(2) Jain Jacob M, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shaimaa Fouad Mohammed Hegazi El Bayar, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jain Jacob M, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Seyed Masoud Ghoreishi Mokri, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Russia.

(2) Dhirenkumar Babubhai Bhoi, Kamdhenu University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Seyed Masoud Ghoreishi Mokri, Russia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dhirenkumar Babubhai Bhoi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Shaikh Salahuddin Shaikh Rafiuddin, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, MAFSU, India.

(2) Akhter Rasool, Madras Veterinary College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shaikh Salahuddin Shaikh Rafiuddin, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Akhter Rasool, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Essam Hussein Abdel-Shakour, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Naveen Joshi, IPS Academy, India.

(2) Deblina Roy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Naveen Joshi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deblina Roy, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Alemayehu Bashe Bade, South Ethiopia Agricultural Research Institute, Areka Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia.

(2) Perves Ahmed, SCS College of Agriculture, Assam Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alemayehu Bashe Bade, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Perves Ahmed, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Manal Abdel Rahman Sorour, Deputy of Research, Food Technology Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Islam Sayah, University of Monastir, Tunisia.

(2) Wafa Mkadem, Higher Institute of Biotechnology Sidi Thabet, University Manouba, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Islam Sayah, Tunisia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Wafa Mkadem, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent Son, School of Silifke, Mersin University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Vinay Verma, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

(2) Raghunandan B.L., Anand Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vinay Verma, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Raghunandan B.L., India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Praveenkumar P, Anna University, India.

(2) Sabaa Jawad Abdulkadhim, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Funmilola Oluwafemi, National Space Research and Development Agency (NASRDA), Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Praveenkumar P, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sabaa Jawad Abdulkadhim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Agrarian University, Russia and Institute of Construction and Transport Infrastructure, Kuban State Technological University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Thefeson Vilhena Oliveira, Federal University of Pará, Brazil.

(2) Rohan S Shreshthi, Dr. D. Y. Patil College of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Thefeson Vilhena Oliveira, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rohan S Shreshthi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA