Peer Review History: Advances in the Improvement of Oncidium History and Perspectives

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Senior Staff Scientist & Principal Researcher, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Dilip Kumar Verma, ICAR-IARI, India.

(2) Juan Camilo Ordonez Blanco, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Colombia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dilip Kumar Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Juan Camilo Ordonez Blanco, Colombia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In vitro Evaluation of Fungicides and Bio-rationals against Pestalotiopsis psidii Causing Guava Fruit Canker

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Sopialena, Mulawarman University, Indonesia.

(2) Nabakishor Nongmaithem, College of Agriculture, Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sopialena, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nabakishor Nongmaithem, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Two Biological Insecticides (Azadirachta indica and Bacillus thuringiensis) and a Chemical insecticide (Diflubenzuron WP) against Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Maize Crop, Western Bur

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chung-Jen Chiang, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Vignesh, Palar Agricultural College, India.

(2) Shiv Kumar Yadav, Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Vignesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shiv Kumar Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Future of Renewable Energy: Ethical Implications of AI and Cloud Technology in Data Security and Environmental Impact

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Leo Willyanto Santoso, Assistant Professor, Petra Christian University, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohd Murtaja, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, India.

(2) Chijioke Paul Agupugo, Appalachian State University, USA.

(3) Muhammad Zunnurain Hussain, Bahria University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohd Murtaja, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chijioke Paul Agupugo, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Muhammad Zunnurain Hussain, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Efficacy and Residual Analysis of Three Insecticides against Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) on Field-grown Tomatoes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Moaed Al Meselmani, Grantham Centre, The University of Sheffield, UK.

Reviewers:

(1) Priyadarshani P Mohapatra, College of Community Science, Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) Syed Muneeb Haider, University of Gujrat, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Biljana Atanasova, Goce Delcev University, Republic of North Macedonia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Priyadarshani P Mohapatra, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Syed Muneeb Haider, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Antimicrobial Efficacy and Quality Changes in Pineapple Juice Treated with Natural Preservatives

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Ferial Mohamed Abu- Salem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Cozma Antoanela Lena, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I of Romania”, Romania.

(2) Oforiwaah Kukuwaa Smith, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.

(3) Gangani Dharmarathne, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Cozma Antoanela Lena, Romaniay) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oforiwaah Kukuwaa Smith, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gangani Dharmarathne, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Review on Quinoa

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, Old Civil Hospital of Guadalajara “Fray Antonio Alcalde”, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Manasa R, University of Mysore, India.

(2) Ayushi Joshi, GB Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S. Vignesh, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manasa R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ayushi Joshi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development of Composite Adsorptive Biosorbent from H3PO4-NaOH-BaCl2 Modified Almond Shell: Experimental and Statistical Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) A.P.G.M.V. Samaraweera, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.

(2) Asim Yaqub, Comsats University, Pakistan.

(3) N. Muthulakshmi Andal, Psgr Krishnammal College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.34/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A.P.G.M.V. Samaraweera, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Asim Yaqub, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (N. Muthulakshmi Andal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comprehensive Review on Valuation Method for Bill of Quantities in Prefabricated Shear Wall Structures Using BIM

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Elangovan, Assistant Professor, School of Electrical and Communication Sciences, B.S.Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Akshay Wayal, MIT ADT University, School of Architecture, India.

(2) Ammu B Crusho, Bishop Jerome Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Akshay Wayal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ammu B Crusho, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Solid-State Fermentation on Phytochemical Composition of Rice Bran Meal

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, Research Professor, State University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Giri, Prabhat Kumar College, India.

(2) Shailendar Mogdumpuram, India.

(3) Shailendra Kumar Rajak, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, BAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abhishek Giri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shailendar Mogdumpuram, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shailendra Kumar Rajak, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA