Peer Review History: Mathematical Modelling of Wastewater Treatment: A Review and Application

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sheng Zhang, Bohai University, Jinzhou, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Nwajuaku Ijeoma Immaculata, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(2) Pravesh Chandra, Moradabad Institute of Technology, India.

(3) Sabadash Vira, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nwajuaku Ijeoma Immaculata, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pravesh Chandra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sabadash Vira, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Faculty Mobility Amid Regional Economic Disparities: A Qualitative Analysis of Teacher Outflow from Guangxi’s Private Universities

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

(2) Dr. Takalani Samuel Mashau, Associate Professor, University of Venda, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Kenneth Besigomwe, Uganda Management Institute, Uganda.

(2) Siti Nor’ain Binti Mohd Hashim, Sultan Idris Educational University, Malaysia.

(3) Philip Donald P. Herrera, Cebu Institute of Technology – University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage :8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kenneth Besigomwe, Uganda) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Siti Nor’ain Binti Mohd Hashim, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Philip Donald P. Herrera, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Basic Education and Its Impact for Career Development Goals among Adult Learners’ in Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maya Tcholakova, Associate Professor, Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Bulgaria.

Reviewers:

(1) Shedrack Ikechukwu Nwadike, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(2) Umar Muhammad, Usmanu Danfodiyo University And Northwest University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shedrack Ikechukwu Nwadike, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Umar Muhammad, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge and Readiness for Menopause: Insights from Premenopausal Women in Rejomulyo Muang Dalam Samarinda City, Indonesia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hom Nath Chalise, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(2) Dr. Giou-Teng, Yiang, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Fahri Özsungur, Mersin University, Turkiye.

(2) Dian Pratiwi, Politeknik Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan Manado, Indonesia.

(3) Renu Agarwal, Shrimathi Devkunvar Nanalal Bhatt Vaishnav College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fahri Özsungur, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dian Pratiwi, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Renu Agarwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Clinicopathological Study of Pityriasis Alba in Libyan Patients

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sushmitha E. S., Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Pronoy Das, India.

(2) Suneeta Panicker, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pronoy Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suneeta Panicker, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: AI-Driven Open Source Intelligence in Cyber Defense: A Double-edged Sword for National Security

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Natural Sciences Center, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil Minister Petrônio Portella University Campus, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Provakar Ghose, University of New Haven, United States.

(2) Himanshu Sinha, Unites States of America.

(3) Hemanth J, Visvesvaraya Technological University- Chikkaballapura, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Provakar Ghose, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Himanshu Sinha, Unites States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hemanth J, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Strengthening Compliance with Data Privacy Regulations in U.S. Healthcare Cybersecurity

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Provakar Ghose, University of New Haven, United States.

(2) Md Nagib Mahfuz Sunny, Trine University, USA.

(3) Hossain Jaman Sohag, Begum Rokeya University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Provakar Ghose, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Md Nagib Mahfuz Sunny, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hossain Jaman Sohag, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Long QT Syndrome Masquerading as Refractory Epilepsy in an Adolescent

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abha Chandra, Senior Professor, Integral Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Integral University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) S.Balaji, St John’s National Academy of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Nanthini K, Kongu Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S.Balaji, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nanthini K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Levels at Presentation and its Association with Platelet Recovery in Newly Diagnosed Immune Thrombocytopenia in Children

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Serpil Ünver Saraydın, Associate Professor , Cumhuriyet University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Lim Ming Chiang, Hospital Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah, Malaysia.

(2) Mudassar Abbas Siddique, Niazi Medical and Dental College, Pakistan.

(3) Sahar M. Hussein, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.17/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lim Ming Chiang, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mudassar Abbas Siddique, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sahar M. Hussein, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Building Academic Resilience through Positive Thinking: A Study of University Students in Syria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College Of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Tauqeer Abdullah, University of Peshawar, Pakistan.

(2) Paul Agmabire Akendita, AAMUSTED, Ghana.

(3) Kayode Ezecheal OBAFEMI, Kwara State University, Malete, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tauqeer Abdullah, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Paul Agmabire Akendita, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kayode Ezecheal OBAFEMI, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA