Peer Review History: Biological Control of Anthracnose in Capsicum annuum Using Inoculants in Hydroponics: A Mechanistic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Gustavo Bich, National University of Misiones, Argentina.

(2) Mahmoud Abbas Ali, South Valley University, Egypt.

(3) Firoozeh Chamandoosti, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

(2) Mohamed KHAMAR, Mohammed V University, Morocco.

(3) Samah Metwally Mahmoud Abd EL-Aziz, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gustavo Bich, Argentina) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahmoud Abbas Ali, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Firoozeh Chamandoosti, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Application at Different Levels on Performance of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) in Agroclimatic Zone-II of Himachal Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Lohith Kumar, N, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Ayesha Siddiqua, UAS, India.

(3) Hanaa Mohamed Sakara, Soil Water and Environmental Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Sharma, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwavidyalya, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lohith Kumar, N, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ayesha Siddiqua, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hanaa Mohamed Sakara, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Rapid Screening of Traditional Rice Cultivars against Drought Using Tolerance Indices of Seedlings

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Satish Chandra Narayan, RPCAU, India.

(2) Preetam Biswas, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Satish Chandra Narayan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Preetam Biswas, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimizing Soil Moisture, Mulching, and Spacing for Yield and Water Productivity in Irrigated Elephant Foot Yam (Amorphophallus paeoniifolius)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Distinguished Professor/Vice President, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahaveer Prasad Ola, Vivekananda Global University, India.

(2) Syed Aasif Hussain Andrabi, School of Agriculture, Glocal University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahaveer Prasad Ola, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Syed Aasif Hussain Andrabi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Effect of Funneliformis mosseae Inoculation on Agronomic Parameters of Maize (Zea mays L.) under a Substrate Subjected to Gold Mining

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien (Retired), The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Heriberto Mendez Cortes, Universidad Autonoma De San Luis Potosi, México.

(2) Inoussa Zongo, National Research Center, Burkina Faso.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Heriberto Mendez Cortes, México) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Inoussa Zongo, Burkina Faso) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum): A Climate Resilient and Nutritionally Significant Crop for Global Food Security

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chandra Shekhar Kapoor, Pacific Academy of Higher Education and Research University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Salisu Audu Baba, College of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Muhammad Zulkiffal, Wheat Research Institute, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M.R. Suchitra, Sastra Deemed To Be University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Salisu Audu Baba, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Zulkiffal, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Clinical Presentation and Prognosis of Infective Endocarditis Prosthesis: A Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Cardiology Center

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, Assistant Professor, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sartaj Ahmad Guroo, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Sanjay Singh, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Medical University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sartaj Ahmad Guroo, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanjay Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Biochar on Evaluating the Growth and Yield Performance of ‘Ansal’ Tomato Variety

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor and HOD, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

(2) Dr. Langa Tembo, University of Zambia, Zambia.

Reviewers:

(1) Raomundo Jimenez Ballesta, Autonoma of Madrid, Spain.

(2) K A Mumithra Kamatchi, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fatima Sarwar, University of agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Raomundo Jimenez Ballesta, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K A Mumithra Kamatchi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Fibroscan®: Indications and Results in Ambulatory Patients

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, Assistant Professor, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nadu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhaskar Pandey, Breach Candy Hospital Trust Mumbai, India.

(2) Anil K. Malhotra, Graphic Era Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhaskar Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anil K. Malhotra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Risk Factors for COVID-19 Mortality in Epidemic Treatment Centers: A Case-Control Study from Decentralized Regions of Senegal

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Israa Faeck Jaafar, Al-esraa University College, Iraq.

(2) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ume Salma, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) Ramdas Bhat, Srinivas College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Raul Copana-Olmos, Universidad Mayor de San Simon, Bolivia.

(4) David Abafi, Liberty University, USA.

(5) Larisa Adela Udriștioiu, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy or University, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ume Salma, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ramdas Bhat, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Raul Copana-Olmos, Bolivia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (David Abafi, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Larisa Adela Udriștioiu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA