Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Jyoti Mehta, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, India.

(2) S. Umamaheswari, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jyoti Mehta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Umamaheswari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Abu Ktellah St., Hebron, Hebron, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Edmealem Temesgen Ebstu, Arba Minch University, Ethiopia.

(2) Goutam Kumar Das, Bajkul Milani Mahavidyalay, Vidyasagar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Edmealem Temesgen Ebstu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Goutam Kumar Das, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohd Saidin Misnan, Associate Professor, Universiti Teknologi, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Kiman Silas, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria.

(2) Abubakar Muhd Shafi’i, Mewar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kiman Silas, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abubakar Muhd Shafi’i, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Yamilé Baró Robaina, Instituto De Investigaciones De Sanidad Vegetal, Cuba.

(2) Amin Asyraf Tamizi, Biotechnology and Nanotechnology Research Centre, Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yamilé Baró Robaina, Cuba) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amin Asyraf Tamizi, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Tikendrajit Saikia, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Intezar Ali, Aligarh Muslim University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tikendrajit Saikia, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Intezar Ali, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Assistant Professor, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Meena Yadav, Maitreyi College, University of Delhi, India.

(2) Lucas Pessanha Mousinho, Universidade De Brasília, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Meena Yadav, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lucas Pessanha Mousinho, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, College of Biomedical Sciences, Larkin University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Joshua Wednesday Edefo, University of Aberystwyth, United Kingdom.

(2) Ado Shehu, Maryam Abacha American University of Niger, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Darakhshan Gazala Bari, Vivek College of Technical Education Bijnor, India.

(2) Kanamala Arun Chand Roby, Vignan Pharmacy College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Joshua Wednesday Edefo, United Kingdom) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ado Shehu, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, DiSTAS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Esther Maria Ferreira Lucas, Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais, Brazil.

(2) Rifat Bhat, SKUAST, India.

(3) Farshid Talat, AREEO, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) James Peaches Phiri, Malawi.

(2) Mohamed KHAMAR, Mohammed V University in Rabat Morocco, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Esther Maria Ferreira Lucas, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rifat Bhat, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Farshid Talat, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Swarnali Duary, Brainware University, India.

(2) Sheri Vaishnav, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Swarnali Duary, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sheri Vaishnav, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pravallika Sree Rayanoothala, Assistant Professor, MS Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology and Management, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Dipayan Sarkar, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(2) Syeda Sana Aamir, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dipayan Sarkar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Syeda Sana Aamir, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA