Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Review on Smartphone Overuse: Analysing Its Influence on Physical Health and Social Relationships in the Digital Age

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tzasna Hernandez Delgado, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Dhanya VJ, SOA Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Anupreeta Chatterjee, IGNOU, India.

(3) Suriati Abdul Gani, Moffat Bible College, Kijabe, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.25/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dhanya VJ, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anupreeta Chatterjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Suriati Abdul Gani, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Refining Harvest Timing and Physiological Maturity for Optimal Seed Yield in Caribbean Stylo (Stylosanthes hamata)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Sohag University, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmad Zada, Yangzhou University, China.

(2) Abeer Abdelaty Ahmed Mohammed, Agriculture Research Center , Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmad Zada, China) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abeer Abdelaty Ahmed Mohammed, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Barriers to the Utilization of Optional Vaccines among Mothers of Children under Five Years of Age in Kheda District, Gujarat

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Richard W. SAWADOGO, Institute for Health Science Research (IRSS), Burkina Faso.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Qumer, Western Sydney University, Australia.

(2) Meenakshi Sharma, Baba Farid university of health sciences, India.

(3) Akinbowale Akinyemi, Lagos State University College of Medicine, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Qumer, Australia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Meenakshi Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Akinbowale Akinyemi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Empirical Relationship between Compressive, Flexural and Splitting Tensile Strengths of Concrete Containing Kuta Gravel as Coarse Aggregate

Editor(s):

(1) Assistant Professor, B.S.Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Hussein Sadiq Latief, Southern Technical University, Iraq.

(2) A.Mohan, Easwari Engineering College, India.

(3) Muhammad Aslam, Wenzhou University of Technology, China.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hussein Sadiq Latief, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A.Mohan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Muhammad Aslam, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: First Report of Dioscorea Bacilliform Virus, a Badnavirus Infecting Yam in Burkina Faso

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Fatemeh Hajilou, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

(2) Mohammed Bukar Aji, Modibbo Adama University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.25/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fatemeh Hajilou, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Bukar Aji, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of Bioelectric Signals in Cancer Genome Regulation and Potential Therapeutic Implication: An Overview

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ida Bagus Budhi Surya Adnyana, Associate Professor, Dr. Moewardi General teaching Hospital, Indonesia and Faculty of Medicine, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia.

(2) Prof. Giulio Tarro, President, Foundation T. & L. de Beaumont Bonelli for cancer Research, Napoli, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Solomon Ojodemi Oguche, Bayero University Kano, Nigeria.

(2) Akshay Ravish, Studies in Organic Chemistry, University of Mysore, India

(3) Muhammad Zohaib, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Solomon Ojodemi Oguche, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Akshay Ravish, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Muhammad Zohaib, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Is there a Correlation between Airways Dimensions and Transversal Dental Distances in Children with Different Growth Patterns?

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sinan INCE, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Wurood khairallah, Dijlah University College, Iraq.

(2) Vineeth V Thundukattil, Kerala university of health sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wurood khairallah, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vineeth V Thundukattil, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on Cancer Diagnostic and Therapeutic Considerations in Dogs

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry, AND National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Alexandru Diana Mihaela, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

(2) Tanveer Ahmad, Bahauddin Zakaria University Multan, Pakistan.

(3) Dhirenkumar Babubhai Bhoi, Veterinary College, Kamdhenu University, INDIA.

(4) Vivek Kumar, Dau Shri Vasudev Chandrakar Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.38/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alexandru Diana Mihaela, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tanveer Ahmad, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dhirenkumar Babubhai Bhoi, INDIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Vivek Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Pharmacological Properties of Dichrostachys cinerea Hydroalcoholic Extract on the Contractility of Taenia Coli Isolated from Guinea Pigs

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Associate Professor, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sandip Chatterjee, Gopal Narayan Singh University, India.

(2) Ahmed Umer Sohaib, Superior University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sandip Chatterjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmed Umer Sohaib, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Comparative Performance of Zinc Sources on Productivity of Rice (Oryza sativa) in Zinc Stressed Soils of Cauvery Delta Zone

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

(2) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Dheerendra Singh, RNTU, Raisen Madhyapradesh, India.

(2) Monika Sharma, Lovely Professional University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dheerendra Singh. India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Monika Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA