Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Cherono Janeth, Kenya.

(2) Po Jen Kuo, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Taiwan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Ahmed Saqib, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) Shaimaa Sayed Mohamed El-Sayed, Luxor University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Cherono Janeth, Kenya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Po Jen Kuo, Taiwan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) James Hellyward, Andalas University, Indonesia.

(2) Deepika, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Waheed, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Pakistan.

(2) Sharew Mekonnen Haile, Werabe University, Ethiopia.

(3) Vipin Maurya, Banaras Hindu University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Behnam Asadi, Dubai.

(2) Madhu Shivhare, NDVSU, Jabalpur, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (James Hellyward, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deepika, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahamed Ashiq I, Institute of Agri-Biotechnology, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Cassia Rejane Do Nascimento, Universidade Federal De Roraima, Brasil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahamed Ashiq I, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Cassia Rejane Do Nascimento, Brasil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Navadha Bhatt, Graphic Era Hill University, India.

(2) Iqra Munir, The University of Lahore, Pakistan.

(3) Dileep Kumar Banisetti, Maharajah’s College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ajay Kumar Vishwakarma, Government Medical College, Haldwani, India.

(2) Limasunep Ozukum, Platinum College, India.

(3) Nilima Sanjay Dharkar, Dr D Y Patil College of Ayurved & Research Centre, India.

(4) Rajendra Singh Rajput, Mumbai University, India.

(5) Sainika Kanzaria, K.B.  Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, India.

(6) Shital Chavan, Government Ayurved College, Nanded (MS), India.

(7) Swapnil C Raskar, Parul University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Navadha Bhatt, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Iqra Munir, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dileep Kumar Banisetti, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Akmal S. Gaballa, Vice Dean, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Kumar Rishabh Gupta, Indian Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Carlos Henrique Alexandrino, Institute of Science Engineering and Technology, Federal University of the Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valleys, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dafil, Raymond Panshak, University of Jos, Nigeria.

(2) Omayma El- Sayed Ahmed Mousa, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kumar Rishabh Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Carlos Henrique Alexandrino, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Angelo Mark P Walag, University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Ashok Kumar Tiwari, Deendayal Research Institute, India.

(2) Behrouz Behrouzi-Rad, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Guillermo Galindo Reyes, Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ashraf Morsy, Alexandria University, Egypt.

(2) Benett Siyabonga Madonsela, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, South Africa.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ashok Kumar Tiwari, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Behrouz Behrouzi-Rad, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Lalit M. Patil, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, India.

(2) Obiageri Florence Ajah, David Umahi Federal University of Health Sciences, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ana Maria Arambarri, Universidad Nacional De La Plata (UNLP), La Plata National University, Argentina.

(2) Cardei Petru, INMA Bucharest, Romania.

(3) Justin R Nayagam, Union Christian College, India.

(4) Monica Guadalupe Lozano Contreras, National Institute of Forest Research Agricultural and Livestock (INIFAP), Mexico.

(5) Shumba Tobias Takawira, Harare Polytechnic, Zimbabwe.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Jesús G. Rodríguez Diego, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, (UAM), Autonomous Metropolitan University, México.s

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lalit M. Patil, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Obiageri Florence Ajah, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Mekuannet Worku Tefera, Debre Tabor University, Ethiopia.

(2) Gde Eka Martiningsih, Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar, Indonesia.

(3) Anurag Hazarika, Tezpur University, St.Xavier’s College, India.

(4) Geeta Singh, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, JNKVV, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Dickson Mdhlalose, National Electronic Media Institute of South Africa, South Africa.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mekuannet Worku Tefera, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gde Eka Martiningsih, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anurag Hazarika, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Geeta Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chandra Jyoti Sonowal, Assistant Professor, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohd Fauzi Bin Mohd Yunus, Polytechnic of Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia.

(2) Jajnaseni Rout, Ravenshaw University, India.

(3) Mahnoor Amjad, Kohsar University Murree, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) P. K. K.S. Gunarathne, Rubber Research Institute of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohd Fauzi Bin Mohd Yunus, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jajnaseni Rout, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mahnoor Amjad, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, Assistant Professor, V. V. Vanniaperumal College for Women, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nadu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Nadim Ahmad, Ayurvedic& Unani Tibbia College and Hospital, India.

(2) Ekta Rani, GGSMCH, BFUHS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gauri Metkar, MUHS, Nashik University, India.

(2) Sudhir Kumar, TSM Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nadim Ahmad, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ekta Rani, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA