Peer Review History: Flowcytometry Immunophenotyping: Role in Acute Leukemia and Detection of Aberrant Expressions in the Indian Population

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenod Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Dinberu Oyamo, Dilla University Hospital, Ethiopia.

(2) Ola Mousa, Minia University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ivet Koleva, Medical University of Sofia, Bulgaria.

(2) Sanjeev V Jakati, Sankalchand Patel University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Boopathi Raja M, The Erode College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Carmine Finelli, Italy.

(3) Rainer Voisard, Military Hospital of Ulm, Germany.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dinberu Oyamo, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ola Mousa, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Osmosis: A Natural Approach for Treating Constipation

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Endang Tri Wahyuni, Gadhah Mada University, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) P S N Sri Bala, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Sultan Ul Uloom College of Pharmacy, India

(2) C.P. Reghunadhan Nair, Cochin University of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amanpreet Kaur, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, India.

(2) David Paul, NIPER-Kolkata, India.

(3) Sneha Gupta, King George’s Medical University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P S N Sri Bala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (C. P. Reghunadhan Nair, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Speed Breeding in Cereal Crops: Accelerating Genetic Improvement for Rapid Agricultural Advancement

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, M. University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Santosh Vishnu Sawardekar, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

(2) Mehmet Ulas, Olive Research Institute, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aditya Pratap Singh, GIET University, India.

(2) Samira Ali Hassan Osman, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Santosh Vishnu Sawardekar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mehmet Ulas, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Characterization of Mulberry Stalk Biochar and its Impact on Soil Nutrients Release

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Prof. Levent Son, The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Rabie Zeinah, General Commission for Scientific Agricultural Research, Syria.

(2) Meenakshi Attri, SKUAST Jammu, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rabie Zeinah, Syria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Meenakshi Attri, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Socio Economic Study of Toukoudi Millet Technology in Niger, Africa

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Gerald Aranoff, Ariel University, Israel.

Reviewers:

(1) Nalini Tripathi, Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, India.

(2) N. Senthilkumar, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ambugus Peter, Nigerian Institute of Leather and Science Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Haruna Abdullahi, Ahamdu Bello University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Padmalini Singh, RV Institute of Management, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nalini Tripathi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N. Senthilkumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Bee Attractants on the Attraction of Apis dorsata and their Impact on Seed Yield of Niger Guizotia abyssinica (L.f.) Cass Crop

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Fereidun Mohebbi, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization, Iran.

(2) Ashok Karuppannasamy, Tata Institute for Genetics and Society, India.

(3) R. Valliappan, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Deepti Tomar, Government Degree College, Nainpur, India.

(2) Kakavipure Dilip K., B.N.N. College Bhiwandi, University of Mumbai, India.

(3) Lekha, Agriculture University Jodhpur, India.

(4) M Giner, Spain.

(5) Namgay Rinchen, Royal University of Bhutan, Bhutan.

(6) N.Geetha, India.

(7) R.K. Gokulakrishnaa, MIT College of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(8) Ştefan Ţalu, The Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

(9) Vivek Sharma, The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Himmat Singh, ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, India.

(2) Khaled kh. Al-khafaji, Marine Science Center-University of Basrah, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fereidun Mohebbi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashok Karuppannasamy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (R. Valliappan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phytochemical Study, Evaluation of Antihelminthic Potential and In silico Screening for Breast Cancer Using Mimosa pudica Linn.

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Kabran Guy Roger Mida, Université Nangui Abrogoua, Côte d’Ivoire.

(2) Mela Yoro, Federal University of Kashere, Nigeria.

(3) Ouchenane Sihem, Badji Mokhtar University, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aruna Rachel Pakyanadhan, Dr. VRK Womens Medical College and Hospital, India.

(2) Hydi Ahmed, ISNC Jeddah, Egypt.

(3) Shoei-Sheng Lee, National Taiwan University, Taiwan (R.O.C.).

(4) Zafrul Allam, University of Bahrain, Bahrain.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ni Made Dewianti, Kartini Bali Health Polytechnic, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.17/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kabran Guy Roger Mida, Côte d’Ivoire) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mela Yoro, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ouchenane Sihem, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Social Mobility and Youth Aspirations: An Analysis of the Conditional Convergence of Aspirations in India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Gustavo Henrique Silva de Souza, Federal Institute of The North of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Shraddhesh Kumar Tiwari, Gautam Buddha University Greater Noida, India.

(2) Karin Julissa Ponce Rojas, University Private of Trujillo, Peru.

(3) Diana Widhi Rachmawati, Universitas PGRI Palembang, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.56/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shraddhesh Kumar Tiwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Karin Julissa Ponce Rojas,Peru) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Diana Widhi Rachmawati, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pharmacological Implications of Natural Products of Fruits and Vegetable Origin on the Activity of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. John Yahya I. Elshimali, Adjunct Professor, UCLA School of Medicine & Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, California, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Asha Latha, YSRUHS, Govt Medical College, India.

(2) Deepa Sharma, CCRAS-Central Ayurveda Research Institute, India.

(3) Devalraju Ravisankar, Medinirai Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) David Paul, NIPER-Kolkata, India.

(2) Devalraju Ravisankar, Medinirai Medical College, India.

(3) J Renukadevi, Saveetha College of Pharmacy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Bhaskar Behera, Fakir Mohan University, India.

(2) G. Dayanand Reddy, Siddha Central Research Institute, India.

(3) Pathakala Naveen, Anurag University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Asha Latha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deepa Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Devalraju Ravisankar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Role of Chitosan in Post Harvest Disease Management

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ninoska M. Paz Palacios, Universidad Bolivariana De Venezuela, Venezuela.

(2) Miguel Velazquez-Manzanares, Universidad Autonoma de Coahuila, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Madhuri Sharma, NDVSU, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ninoska M. Paz Palacios, Venezuela) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Miguel Velazquez-Manzanares, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA