Peer Review History: Phosphocalcic Profile of Chronic Kidney Disease at Libreville

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. K.V. Ramanath, Principal, Rajeev College of Pharmacy (Approved by PCI, New Delhi, Recongised by Government of Karnataka, Affiliated to RGUHS, Bangalore), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Arpita K.Vaidya, Dinsha Patel College of Nursing, India.

(2) Kanduri Bala Hanumath Sriram, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rajesh Kumar Manchi, T. S. Misra Medical College, T. S. Mishra University, India.

(2) Sowjanya U V P U, Government Medical College, Vizianagaram, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arpita K.Vaidya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kanduri Bala Hanumath Sriram, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Riemann Hypothesis: A Fresh and Experimental Exploration

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Sheng Zhang, School of Mathematical Sciences, Bohai University, Jinzhou, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Kalyanlakshmi Chitta, India.

(2) Riyam Noori Jawad, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kalyanlakshmi Chitta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Riyam Noori Jawad, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on the Growth and Yield of Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Umesh Barikara, Assistant  Professor & Extension Leader, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Dr. Alessandro Buccolieri, University of Salento, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Narendra Pratap Verma, School of Agriculture Science, LNCT University, India.

(2) K. Surekha, ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Vidyavathi G Yadahalli, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) C. Navin Kumar, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Reginawanti Hindersah, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Narendra Pratap Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. Surekha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Water Quality Assessment of Drinking Water, Communal Faucets, and Traditional Water Pump Inside a University Campus

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Claudia Coelho, Assistant Professor, University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Soumya S, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, India.

(2) Suneeta Panicker, Dr. D. Y. Patil Arts, Commerce and Science College, India.

(3) Sudhir Sharadrao Hunge, Chintamani College of Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Loth Botahala, Tribuana Kalabahi University, Indonesia.

(2) Manoj H. Mota, Annasaheb Dange College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(3) P.Nagendra, University of Mysore, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Soumya S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suneeta Panicker, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sudhir Sharadrao Hunge, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unraveling the Complex Dynamics of Soil Microbiome Diversity and Its Implications for Ecosystem Functioning: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Alejandra C. Zamora Figueroa, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Venezuela.

(2) William Arputha Sundar, Swamy Vivekanandha College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Kamal Prasad, Center for Advanced Agriculture Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nagalambika Prasad, JSS academy of Higher Education and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Antonio Francisco De Sousa, Secretaria da Educacao do Ceara, Brazil.

(2) María Gabriela Di Barbaro, National University of Catamarca, Argentina.

(3) M Raveendra Reddy, Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(4) Sudhanshu Kumar Bharti, Patna University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alejandra C. Zamora Figueroa, Venezuela) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (William Arputha Sundar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kamal Prasad, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Surface and Subsurface Structural Mapping of Lokoja Central Nigeria Using Airborne Magnetic and Remote Sensing Data

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Pradip K Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Shah Naseer, COMSATS University, Pakistan.

(2) Sachin Kumar Tripathi, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Tshibangu Wa Ilunga John, University of Lubumbashi, Republic of Congo.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shah Naseer, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sachin Kumar Tripathi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antibacterial Effect of Nanoparticles Synthesized from Ficus exaseprata (Sandpaper Leaves)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Angelica Machi Lazarin, Associate Professor, State University of Maringa, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Basavaraj S Hunasagi, BLDDEA’s SSM College of Pharmacy and Research Center, India.

(2) Nadhir N.A. Jafar, Al-Zahraa Center for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research Sciences, Al-Zahraa University for Women, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alyaa Razooqi Hussein, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Azita Dilmaghani, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(3) Rakhi Khandelwal, Government Mahila Engineering College, Ajmer, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Chandra Shekhar Seth, University of Delhi, India.

(2) Gity Behbudi, University of Guilan, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Basavaraj S Hunasagi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nadhir N.A. Jafar, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Wind Resource and Its Energy Potential in Three States of Northwest Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shi-Hai Dong, Computing Research Center, National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Shailja Singh, NIMS University, India.

(2) Sandesh Hegde, Visvesvaraya Technological University, Srinivas Institute of Technology, India.

(3) Navjot Singh Sandhu, School of Renewable Energy and Efficiency, National Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) L. Ramayee, BITS-Pilani, India.

(2) P. Viswanathan, PSG College of Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shailja Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sandesh Hegde, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Navjot Singh Sandhu, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Resilience: Smart Grid Cybersecurity and Fault Diagnosis Strategies

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Natural Sciences Center, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil Minister Petrônio Portella University Campus, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Basile Starynkevitch, France.

(2) Kibreab Adane, Arba Minch University, Institute of Technology, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Karimulla Syed, Acharya Nagarjuna University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ahmed Talal Kamil, Aliraqia University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Basile Starynkevitch, France) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kibreab Adane, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Incubators in Neonatal Medicine

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Akram, Associate Professor, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Dhananjay Pandey, Govt. Naveen Girls College, India.

(2) Pegah Sharifian, University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dhananjay Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pegah Sharifian, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA