Peer Review History: Effects of Canned Tomatoes Consumption on Hematological Profile, Renal Markers, and Histology Using Male Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Armel Hervé Nwabo Kamdje, Assistant Professor, University of Ngaoundere, Cameroon.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Grace Jebakani Sweety, Our Lady of Health College of Nursing, India.

(2) Vipul Ajit Sansare, Dnyandeep College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Vipul Ajit Sansare, Dnyandeep College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Grace Jebakani Sweety, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vipul Ajit Sansare, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Awareness of Farmers on Effect of Harvest to Mill Gap Duration on Quality of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Subrata Nath, India.

(2) Prakash Balu, Vels University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Essome Sale Charles, University of Yaoundé 1, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Kamal Prasad, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Subrata Nath, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prakash Balu India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development and Performance Evaluation of Garlic Planter

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Pakkiranna Sivamma, ICAR – Indian Institute of Seed Science, India.

(2) Narjis Zamil Abdulzahra, College of Sciences, Al- Nahrain University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bayboboev Nabijon Gulomovich, Namangan Engineering Construction Institute, Uzbekistan.

(2) Faisal Mohammed Saif Al-Shamiry, Thamar University, The Republic of Yemen.

(3) Subrata Kumar Mandal, CSIR-Central Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pakkiranna Sivamma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Narjis Zamil Abdulzahra, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Journal Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of Innovative Work Behavior as an Intervening Variable in the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Information Sharing on Employee Performance

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maria Ciurea, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Sagar Singh, Bahria University, Pakistan.

(2) Ermie Lux L. Matildo, North Eastern Mindanao State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nazarious Rukanyangira, Muni University, Uganda.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Desalegn Sherkabu Abadama, Ethiopian Civil Service University, Ethiopia.

(2) Saqib Munir, Shah Abdul Latif University, Pakistan.

(3) Victor Chikampa, Mulungushi University, Zambia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sagar Singh, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ermie Lux L. Matildo, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Domestic Violence During Pregnancy and Risk of Obstetrical Complications

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yong X. Gan, Associate Professor, California State Polytechnic University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhakti Murkey, Pacific Medical College and Hospital, India.

(2) Asman, Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Indonesia.

(3) Barnali Maity, Ramnagar College of Vidyasagar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ebikabowei Musah, Government Model Secondary School, Ekeremor, Nigeria.

(2) Victory Iyanam, University of Uyo, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhakti Murkey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Asman, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Barnali Maity, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Compound Growth Rate and Economic Analysis of Production of Cotton in Bemetara District of Chhattisgarh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Stephen Kibet Kimutai, Moi University, Kenya.

(2) Pradip Hajong, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Fatahi Ibrahim, Takoradi Technical University, Ghana.

(2) Bello Abdulhanan, Federal Polytechnic Nasarawa, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Siti Cahya Santini, Bandung Institute of Technology, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Stephen Kibet Kimutai, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pradip Hajong, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Interference of Heterophilic Antibody in D-dimer Determination in an Asymptomatic Elderly Woman

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Juan Carlos Troiano, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) G Ambujam Ms Fics Faes, Vinayaka Missions Medical College and Hospitals, India.

(2) Attapon Cheepsattayakorn, Western University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

T
Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G Ambujam Ms Fics Faes, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Attapon Cheepsattayakorn, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Soil Application of Cyazypyr 20% SC for Jassid (Empoasca flavescens) Ishida Control in Brinjal

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, M. University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Hussein Ali Salim, Iraq.

(2) Nisreen Alsaoud, Al- Baath University, Syria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Yusuf Hajara Oyiza, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ahad   Sahragard, University of Guilan, Iran.

(2) Shah Kamal Khan, Bangladesh.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hussein Ali Salim, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nisreen Alsaoud, Syria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Cost Evaluation of Bread Production from Composite of Wheat Flour and Corn Flour

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Surapong Pinitglang, Assistant Professor, Dean, School of Science and Technology, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Tetiana Stepanova, Sumy National Agrarian University, Ukraine.

(2) Seelamanthula Sreenivasu, Shri Vishnu Engineering College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tetiana Stepanova, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Seelamanthula Sreenivasu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Learners’ Motivation for the Study of Ghanaian Language at Senior High School

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Onorina Botezat, Associate Professor, “Dimitrie Cantemir” Christian University, Bucharest, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Dipendra Kumar Khatri, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(2) Portia Mkhonta, University of Eswatini, Eswatini.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dipendra Kumar Khatri, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Portia Mkhonta, Eswatini) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA