Peer Review History: Novel Synthetic Derivatives of Sydnones and Elucidation of Biological Applications

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Somdet Srichairatanakool, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Muath Jabbar Tarfa Al- Abbasee, University of Samarra, Iraq.

(2) Qassim Abdul-Hussein Jabe, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dumitrescu Denisa Elena, Ovidius University of Constanta, Romania.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muath Jabbar Tarfa Al- Abbasee, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Qassim Abdul-Hussein Jaber, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Investigation of Phytochemical Constituents, Antioxidant Potential, In vivo Antidiarrheal, and Neuropharmacological Activities of Oxyspora paniculata Leaves

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor and Hod, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Omar Hussein Ahmed, Tikrit University College of Pharmacy, Iraq.

(2) A Vasanthakumari, Dr MGR Medical University, India.

(3) Farah Saeed, Dow University of Health Sciences, Pakistan.

(4) Emily M. Cataluna, Iloilo Doctors’ College, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S. Murugesan, National Institute of Siddha, India.

(2) Sudheer Kumar Dokuparthi, Vijaya College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Nene Bi Semi Anthelme, Felix Houphouet-Boigny University, Ivory Coast.

(2) Suticha Kittayaruksakul, Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Thailand.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Omar Hussein Ahmed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A Vasanthakumari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Farah Saeed, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Emily M. Cataluna, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Factors Affecting Stock Price Volatility of Commercial Banks in Nepal

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maria-Dolores Guillamon, Associate Professor, University of Murcia, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Zulqarnain Jatoi, Khawaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Pakistan.

(2) Sufia Zaman, Techno India University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Swapan Sarkar, University of Calcutta, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1)  Aye Aye Khin, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR), Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Zulqarnain Jatoi, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sufia Zaman, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparison of Long-term Outcomes between Hirschsprung’s Disease Patients after Soave Procedure and Duhamel Procedure Based on the Paediatric Incontinence and Constipation Scoring System: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Janvier Gasana, Associate Professor, Kuwait University, Kuwait.

Reviewers:

(1) Ritankar Sengupta, Deben Mahata Government Medical College& Hospital, The West Bengal University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Brent Andrew G. Viray, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ritankar Sengupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Brent Andrew G. Viray, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy When to Convert

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Itamar S. Oliveira-Júnior, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Alfredo Chama Naranjo, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México, México.

(2) Muhammad Saleem Iqbal, Allied Hospital Faisalabad, Faisalabad Medical University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alfredo Chama Naranjo, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Saleem Iqbal, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Fungicides on Mycelium Growth of Rhizoctonia solani of Rice under In-vitro

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Hirdesh Kumar Sachan, Fiji National University, Fiji Islands.

Reviewers:

(1) Manju Evelyn, College of Technology, University of Bamenda, Cameroon.

(2) Alabi Olusoji David, Durban University of Technology, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aditi Sharma, Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

(2) Munawar Fazal, College of Commerce, Arts & Science, Patliputra University, Patna, India.

(3) N. Geetha, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manju Evelyn, Cameroon) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alabi Olusoji David, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study of Marketing of Milk in Hardoi District of Uttar Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wang Guangjun, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Divya Rajpurohit, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, India.

(2) Payal Jaiswal, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nadia Hamdi Fahim, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Divya Rajpurohit, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Payal Jaiswal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Influence of Interaction Quality, Physical Environment Quality, and Environmentally Friendly Practices on Brand Personality and Brand Reputation with Customer Experience as a Mediating Variable

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vasilii Erokhin, School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Flavio Andrew do Nascimento Santos, Berlin School of Business and Innovation, Germany.

(2) Angsuman Chanda, Raja N. L. Khan Women’s College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hui-Hsin Huang, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taiwan.

(2) Margarita Išoraitė, Lithuania.

(3) Oyerinde Oluyinka Moses, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Flavio Andrew do Nascimento Santos, Germany) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Angsuman Chanda, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Motivation Level of ODL Students Based on Keller’s ARCS Model: A Case of Dual Mode University in West Bengal, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Muktiarni, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia.

(2) Subhash Chandra Basu, H. P. University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) David C. Coker, Fort Hays State University, USA.

(2) Justina I. Ezenwafor, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(3) Listyani, UKSW, Indonesia.

(4) Rajasekaran S, University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Ibri, Oman.

(5) Sadaf Konain Ansari, Niazi Medical and Dental College, Pakistan.

(6) Slavoljub Hilčenko, University of Novi Sad, Serbia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Low Jie Ying, Institute of Teacher Education (Ipoh Campus), Malaysia.

(2) Luis Fernando González Beltrán, UNAM, México.

(3) Marzieh Dehghan-Chaleshtori, University at Albany, State University of New York, United States.

(4) Oyarinde Oluremi .N, University Ibadan, Nigeria.

(5) Raheela Afzal, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Pakistan.

(6) Roleen B. Moleño, Carmen National High School, Philippines.

(7) Teresa Paiva, Polytechnic of Guarda, Portugal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muktiarni, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Subhash Chandra Basu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Crop Productivity through Nanotechnology: A Comprehensive Review of Strategies and Results

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Mohamed Fadel, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Division National Research Center El-Behos Street, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Iffah Hazirah Bt. Mohd Nawi, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Malaysia.

(2) Gaber Ahmed Bassyouni Shehata, Alexandria University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Iffah Hazirah Bt. Mohd Nawi, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gaber Ahmed Bassyouni Shehata, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA