Peer Review History: Burden of HIV on Society Current Management Options and Future Prospective

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Akmal Nabil Ahmad El-Mazny, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Clement Kwabena Apaw, Southern Medical University, China.

(2) Jag Mohan Prajapati, Madhya Pradesh Medical Science  University, India.

(3) Madhvi Sanwalka, NIMS&R, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gideon Awenabisa Atanuriba, University of Eastern Finland, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Clement Kwabena Apaw, China) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jag Mohan Prajapati, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Madhvi Sanwalka, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparison of Conventional Radiography and Multidetector Computed Tomography Scan in Knee Trauma in Rajavithi Hospital

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Akram, Associate Professor, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Syed Muhammad Tayyab Hassan, Dar As Sihha Medical Center, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Mordicai Atinga, Aga Khan University Hospital, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Syed Muhammad Tayyab Hassan, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mordicai Atinga, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Perceived Attributes and E-Readiness of Extension Personnel to Use ICTs

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. A. Elbagermi, Misurata University, Libya.

Reviewers:

(1) Hilda Mpirirwe, Nkumba University, Uganda.

(2) Francisco O. Esgrina, Jr, College of Agriculture, Agribusiness, Forestry, and Food Sciences, College of Teacher Education, Cotabato Foundation College of Science and Technology, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rito Cipta Sigitta H, Universitas Bhamada Slawi, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hilda Mpirirwe, Uganda) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Francisco O. Esgrina, Jr., Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sustainable Solutions: Integrating Renewable Energy and Electric Vehicles for Cleaner Operations

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nyoman Puspa Asri, Universitas Ciputra Surabaya, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Alberto Tama Franco, Universitat Carlemany, United States.

(2) Archana K, Cambridge Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alberto Tama Franco, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Archana K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: First Report of Stem Borer (Xylotrechus smei) Occurrence on Red Sanders Plantations of Tamil Nadu and Gujarat, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Morteza Kahrarian, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Purshotam Singh, SKUAST, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dumpapenchala Vijayreddy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, India.

(2) Gummadala Kasirao, G D Goenka University, India.

(3) Purshotam Singh, SKUAST, Kashmir, India.

(4) Rashmi Sharma, SPCGCA, MDSU, India.

(5) Satyabrata Sarangi, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(6) Sitesh Chatterjee, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Koudegnan Comlan Mawussi, University of Lomé, Togo.

(2) Pedro Saúl Castillo Carrillo, Universidad Nacional de Tumbes, Perú.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/0

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Morteza Kahrarian, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Purshotam Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutritional Evaluation of Peanut Chikki Incorporated with Amla Pomace Powder

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Eman Ibrahim El-Sayed Abdel-Wahab, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(2) R. Mala, Mepco Schlenk Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Eman Ibrahim El-Sayed Abdel-Wahab, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Mala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

The peer review history will be available very soon.

Peer Review History: Effect of Land Configuration on Different Crop Based Chickpea Sequences in Dryland Area of Central India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien (Retired), The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Kanwalpreet Kaur, Guru Nanak Dev University, India.

(2) Tushar Umedbhai Patel, College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kanwalpreet Kaur, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tushar Umedbhai Patel, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comparison and Evaluation of Loop Diuretic Frusemide Generic vs Brand Tablets

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Gunasekar Manoharan, New Jersey Bio Science Centre, USA.

(2) S. Bharanidharan, Panimalar Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Appala Swamy Naidu Rongala, India.

(2) Maharudra S. Rakh, Jagdamba Shikshan Prasark Mandal’s College of B. Pharmacy & Research Centre, India.

(3) R Valliappan, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gunasekar Manoharan, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Bharanidharan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Innovative Approaches for Dynamic System Monitoring: Signal Processing and Parameter Estimation Strategies

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lamsoudi Redouane, Regional Center for Education and Training Professions Casablanca- Settat El Jadida Provincial Section, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Raja Kusi, Institute of Engineering, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(2) Sneha Nagar, Indore Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M. Shyamalagowri, Erode Sengunthar Engineering College, India.

(2) Raheel Muzzammel, University of Lahore, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Raja Kusi, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sneha Nagar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Investigation of a Cathodic Protection Configuration for the Steel Casing Pipes in Reinforced Concrete Bridge in the Niger Delta

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Raul Duarte Salgueiral Gomes Campilho, ISEP – School of Engineering, Porto, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Anurag Wahane, Shri Shankaracharya Institute of Professional Management and Technology, India.

(2) L. Anojkumar, Jansons Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anurag Wahane, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (L. Anojkumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA