Peer Review History: Coriander Yield Characteristics as Influenced by Varied Date of Sowing and Planting Geometry under Chhattisgarh Plain Zone

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Central Lab. for Research and Development of Date Palm, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Habte Berhanu Umata, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Ethiopia.

(2) Nasser Tarraf Ibrahem, Syria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhidin Biya Hajigelan, Jimma Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Habte Berhanu Umata, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nasser Tarraf Ibrahem, Syria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Releasing Patterns of Potassium and its Relationship with Different Forms of Potassium in Acid Alfisols Soils of Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien (Retired), The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Anang Susanto, Merdeka University, Indonesia.

(2) Mohammed Ali Makki Al Rubaee, Wasit University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hayder Azeez Ali Al-Shebly, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical, Iraq.

(2) Kou Hayakawa, Japan.

(3) Olifir Yurii, Ukraine.

(4) P Soman, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Abdel-Monnem Sadalaha Khalel, Technical Agricultural College, Iraq.

(2) Amit A. Shahane, Agricultural University, Imphal, India.

(3) Márcio de Souza Dias, Brazil.

(4) S.Mohandas, Tamil Nadu Agrl. University, India.

(5) Victor M. Rodriguez Moreno, Mexico.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anang Susanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Ali Makki Al Rubaee, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Total Exposure of a Hydroxyapatite Orbital Implant, Five Years after Evisceration: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Panagiotis Tsikripis, University of Athens, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Rabeeah Zafar, Al-Shifa Trust Eye Hospital, Pakistan.

(2) Anuradha, Military Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Vijay Kumar Singh, Rani Durgavati Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rabeeah Zafar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anuradha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Evaluation of Nano Urea Versus Conventional Urea for Nitrogen Management in Rainfed Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Cultivation in Acid Sandy Loam Soils of Assam.

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Siraj Khan, Qarshi University, Pakistan.

(2) Norazlina Ahmad, Mersing Polythecnic, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Eligio C. Borres, Dr. Emilio B. Espinosa Sr. Memorial State College of Agriculture and Technology, Philippines.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Siraj Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Norazlina Ahmad, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Students’ Awareness of Translating the Pragmatic Aspects of the English Language

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Onorina Botezat, Associate Professor, “Dimitrie Cantemir” Christian University, Bucharest, Romania.

(2) Prof. Atila Yildirim, Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey.

(3) Prof. Suleyman Goksoy, University of Duzce, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Aycan Kaderli, Rauf Denktas University, Cyprus.

(2) Rohit, Abes Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Peredur Webb-Davies, Bangor University, UK.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aycan Kaderli, Cyprus) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rohit, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Effects of Ethanolic Extract of Ficus benghalensis on the Lipid Profile and Kidney Function in Rat Model

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Associate Professor, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Abigail Okezi Isoje, Dennis Osadebay University, Nigeria.

(2) Kam Sami Eric, National Public Health Institute, Burkina Faso.

(3) Yedy Purwandi Sukmawan, University of Bakti Tunas Husada, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abigail Okezi Isoje, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kam Sami Eric, Burkina Faso) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Yedy Purwandi Sukmawan, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Sulphur Application on Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Quality of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien (Retired), The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Hamed Narimani, University of Mohaghegh, Iran.

(2) Nisreen Alsaoud, Al- Baath University, Syria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hamed Narimani, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nisreen Alsaoud, Syria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Tillage, Mulching and Site-Specific Nutrient Management on Soil Temperature, Flowering, Bulk Density and Soil Organic Carbon in Wheat

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kosev Valentin, Associate Professor, Institute of Forage Crops, Pleven, Bulgaria.

Reviewers:

(1) Dhruvendra Singh Sachan, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Olaleye Olalekan Ayodeji, The Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dhruvendra Singh Sachan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Olaleye Olalekan Ayodeji, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Varieties/Genotypes for Jassid, Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida) Resistance under Rainfed Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Shehzad, Associate Professor, The University of Poonch Rawalakot, Pakistan.

(2) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Khoy Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Jorge Octavio Virues Delgadillo, Universidad Veracruzana, México.

(2) Atik Mahabub, Concordia University, Canada.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jorge Octavio Virues Delgadillo, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Atik Mahabub, Canada) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Detection and Molecular Characterization of Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli from Fecal Samples of Cattle Farms Al-Buḥayrah Governorate Egypt

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Simone Aquino, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN), Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Harish kumar. K. S, Kerala University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Debora Brito Goulart, National Animal Disease Center, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Harish kumar. K. S, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Debora Brito Goulart, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA