Peer Review History: Autonomous and Controlled Motivational Behaviour and Student Academic Outcomes in Upper Primary School in a Remote Setting

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Veronica Mîndrescu, Transylvania University of Brasov, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohd Mahadee Ismail, University Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) S. Prakash, Thiagarajar College of Preceptors, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Kafu-Quvane, University of Fort Hare, South Africa.

(2) Firooz Sadighi, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mohd Mahadee Ismail, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (S. Prakash, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Use of Connected Objects (IoT) in the Agricultural Sector in Burkina Faso: Approaches and Perspectives

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pratima Parashar Pandey, Professor, College of Engineering & Technology, Integrated Institutes of Learning, Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam Technical University, Greater Noida, India.c

(2) Dr. Lei Zhang, Winston-Salem State University, North Carolina, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Palanivel Rajan, Sri Eshwar College of Engineering, India.

(2) Chaitanya Vijaykumar Mahamuni, Fr. C Rodrigues Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Tahir, Agricultural Engineering Institute, NARC-Pakistan Agricultural Research Council, Pakistan.

(2) Odashev Iqboljon Mashrabjonovich, Institute for Macroeconomic and Regional Studies Under the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Uzbekistan.

(3) S. Palanivel Rajan, Sri Eshwar College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Pius Uagbae Ejodamen, Admiralty University of Nigeria, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S. Palanivel Rajan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Chaitanya Vijaykumar Mahamuni, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Healing Flora of Konjuh Mountain in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ali Mohamed Elshafei Ali, Professor, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Iris Miraballes Martinez, Universidad De La Republica, Uruguay.

(2) Shivendra Agarwal, Vivekanand College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Atefa Noorain, Osmania University, India.

(2) Faraneh Zareiyan, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Centre, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Deepak M, Arya Vaidya Sala Kottakkal, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Iris Miraballes Martinez, Uruguay) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shivendra Agarwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Challenges Facing Community Participation in Construction Projects of Ward Secondary Schools in Kibaha Town Council, Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Russel J. Aporbo, University of Mindanao Tagum College, Philippines.

(2) Mirajur Rhaman Shaoan, Southwest University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amaonye Chinenye B, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(1) Michael Hangeior Saaondo, University of Mkar, Nigeria.

(3) Portia P. Mkhonta, University of Eswatini, Eswatini.

(4) Saima Siraj, Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering Science & Technology, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Koini Stellah Malaso, Maasai Mara University, Kenya.

(2) Oiva Sikwaya Nauyoma, University of Namibia, Namibia.

(3) Ting Sheng Weng, National Chiayi University, Taiwan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Russel J. Aporbo, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mirajur Rhaman Shaoan, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal_Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Conservation Agriculture System Impact on Soil Nutrient Status in Eastern Dry Zone of Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajib Pati, India.

(2) Oguche, Christopher Joseph, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Amilcar Isidro Servín Niz, Universidad Nacional de Concepción, Paraguay.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rajib Pati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Oguche, Christopher Joseph, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Streamlining Different Plant Breeding Methods to Enhance Water Use Efficiency in Agricultural Systems

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anthony R. Lupo, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) I Gede Ketut Adiputra, Indonesia.

(2) Marwan Noori Ramadhan, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed Mohamed El-Komi , National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries Alexandria, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) W U L Ambagaspitiya, Lyceum International School, Sri Lanka.

(2) Amit A. Shahane, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (I Gede Ketut Adiputra, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Marwan Noori Ramadhan, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Participation of Head Reach and Tail-end Farmers and their Relation between Profile Characteristics in Water Users’ Associations in Tungabhadra Command Area of Koppal District of Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Susilawati Cicilia Laurentia, University of 17 August 1945, Indonesia.

(2) Lourence R. Villaluz, College of Computer Studies, Eastern Samar State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amey Ajgar, MIT World Peace University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Susilawati Cicilia Laurentia, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Lourence R. Villaluz, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Sustainable Practices in Modern Agronomy and their Environmental Impact- A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Yasser Fathi Nassar, Wadi Al-Shatti University, Libya.

Reviewers:

(1) T. Bharath, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, India.

(2) Shahid Mehmood, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (T. Bharath, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shahid Mehmood, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Harnessing Predictive Analytics for Strategic Foresight: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques and Applications in Transforming Raw Data to Actionable Insights

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ayoub Azzayani, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco.

(2) Dr. Fang Xiang, Visiting Professor, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) E.N. Ganesh, SPIHER, India.

(2) Ramakumar Kommajosyula, Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology & Research University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (E. N. Ganesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ramakumar Kommajosyula, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Differences between Facial Aesthetics Improvements of Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip & Palate with Bilateral CLP

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Robert Meves, Professor, Santa Casa Scholl of Medicine, São Paulo University, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Luh Witari Indrayani, Warmadewa University, Indonesia.

(2) Giuseppe Consorti, Marche University Hospital, Italy.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Luh Witari Indrayani, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Giuseppe Consorti, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA