Peer Review History: Optimization, a Potential Production, GC-MS and Characterization of Dark Green Pigment from New Local Isolate Streptomyces nigra Strain GH12

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fernando José Cebola Lidon, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Balaji Nagarajan, United States of America.

(2) Jasmina D. Acharya, Maganbhai Adenvala Mahagujarat University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adamu U Bulakarima, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria.

(2) Ch.Pragati , Dr. YSR UHS, India.

(3) Muthukrishnan Selvaraj, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, India.

(4) Suresh Raghunathrao Kagne, Badrinarayan Barwale College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Balaji Nagarajan, United States of America) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jasmina D. Acharya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Millet Starch – A Potential Functional Ingredient

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Patrícia Matos Scheuer, Federal Institute of Santa Catarina, Brazil.

(2) Rekha Rani, Agriculture University, India.

(3) Jagbir Rehal, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Olha Shapoval, Kharkiv National Medical University, Ukraine.

(2) Tita Mihaela Adriana, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Quadri Syeda Amreen Majiduddin, Dr. Babasaheb Marathwada University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Patrícia Matos Scheuer, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rekha Rani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Jagbir Rehal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Conservation Agriculture Strategies Evaluation under Rainfed Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chen Chin Chang, Adjunct Professor, Hebei Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Bonu Mounika, Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(2) Tapas Kumar Pandit, Uttar BangaKrishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Bonu Mounika, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Tapas Kumar Pandit, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance of Tomato Varieties Arka Rakshak and Arka Samrat in Naturally Ventilated Polyhouse and Its Economic Returns

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Marco Trevisan, Professor, Institute of Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Research Centre Biomass, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Tanuj Kumar Mandal, The Neotia University, India.

(2) Fauzan Romadlon, Institut Teknologi Telkom Purwokerto, Indonesia.

(3) Jocelio dos Santos Araujo, Federal University of Maranhão, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tanuj Kumar Mandal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Fauzan Romadlon, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Jocelio dos Santos Araujo, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Information Sharing among Actors in Dairy Innovation Platforms

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravindrakumar Imdeo Hatzade, India.

(2) Magdalin Leonard Dorobat, National University of Science and Technology, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Celal Cevher, Field Crops Central Researcher Institute, Turkey.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ravindrakumar Imdeo Hatzade, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Magdalin Leonard Dorobat, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Constraints and Suggestions Expressed by the Beneficiaries of Krishi Bhagya Scheme in North Eastern Karnataka Region, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Vasudha, India.

(2) Masoud Roudbari, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Deepanjana Halder Majumder, Jadavpur University, India.

(2) J Balamurugan, Vellore Institute of Technology, India.

(3) Sanjib Kumar Datta, University of Kalyani, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) M. Murali, Medi-Caps University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Vasudha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Masoud Roudbari, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Evaluation of Developed Onion Stem and Root Cutter CumSorting Machine with Manual Cutting Method

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith- 304 022 (Rajasthan), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Monaem Elmnifi, Bright Star University, Libya.

(2) Alireza Allameh, Rice Research Institute of Iran, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Monaem Elmnifi, Libya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Alireza Allameh, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Mediating Role of Investment: Analyzing the Causal Impact of Inflation on Economic Growth and the Influence of Capital Expenditure

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, Visiting Professor, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Asmawi Noor Bin Saarani, University of Malaya, Malaysia.

(2) S. Jaya Bharathi, Coimbatore Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Asmawi Noor Bin Saarani, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (S. Jaya Bharathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Investigation into the Money Demand Function in Cambodia: An Empirical Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chun-Chien Kuo, Associate Professor, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sakshi Aggarwal, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, India.

(2) Ekta Kasana, Amity College of Commerce and Finance, Amity University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Azuka Elvis Ozegbe, Pan-Atlantic University, Nigeria.

(2) Beitollah Akbari Moghaddam, Qazvin Islamic  Azad University, Iran.

(3) Mumtaz Ali Kazmi, National College of Business Administration and Economics, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Asad Ali Khan, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

(2) Salha Ben Salem, University of Monastir, Tunisia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sakshi Aggarwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ekta Kasana, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Abdominal Tuberculosis Simulating Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Diagnostic Dilemma

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sandra Aparecida Marinho, Paraíba State University (Universidade Estadual da Paraíba – UEPB), Campus, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Anup Pradhan, Sikkim Manipal University, India.

(2) Tejeshwari  B V, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Rajarajeswari College of Nursing, India.

(3) Deepak Sethi, Rabindra Nath Tagore Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Azizollah Arbabisarjou, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anup Pradhan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Tejeshwari B V, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Deepak Sethi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA