Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hayder Ali Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Veterinary Medicine College, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Mohammed Al-Hayany, University of Diyala, Iraq.

(2) Dinah Kirigia, Meru University of Science and Technology, Kenya.

(3) Ali Kareem Hussein AL-Taai, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University and Al-Musayyib Technical College, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.62

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Mohammed Al-Hayany, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dinah Kirigia, Kenya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ali Kareem Hussein AL-Taai, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Bineetkaur s. Singh, Agricultural University, India.

(2) Shailendra Sagar Prajapati, College of Agriculture, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bineetkaur s. Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shailendra Sagar Prajapati, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Senior Staff Scientist & Principal researcher, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Narasapuram Rangaswamy, Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(2) G.Narendar, Prof. Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University (PJTAU), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage:  8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Narasapuram Rangaswamy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G.Narendar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Monalisa Paul, India.

(2) Carlos Vilcatoma Medina, National research institute (INIA), Peru.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Monalisa Paul, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Carlos Vilcatoma Medina, Peru) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Almoatazbellah Ali El-Mouhamady Hassan, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Thi Lang Nguyen, Genomic Research Institute and Seed, Ton Duc Thang University, Vietnam.

(3) A. Anisha, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Almoatazbellah Ali El-Mouhamady Hassan, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Thi Lang Nguyen, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 ((A. Anisha, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) L.Dharani, KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Yurii Dehtiarov, State Biotechnological University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (L.Dharani, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yurii Dehtiarov, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Mama Julius, Innovative Institute of Agriculture, Uganda.

(2) Husam Mohammed Muhi, University of Diyala, collage of Agriculture, Iraq.

(3) Rajendra P. Maurya, Suresh Gyan Vihar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.84/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mama Julius, Uganda) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Husam Mohammed Muhi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajendra P. Maurya, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Kavita Solanki, Government Madhav Science College, India.

(2) Oyebamiji yusuf opeyemi, University of Vermont, Usa.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kavita Solanki, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oyebamiji yusuf opeyemi, Usa) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Khairy Abdel-Maksoud Mohamed Abada, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Naziya banu, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khairy Abdel-Maksoud Mohamed Abada, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Naziya banu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Isidro Alberto Pérez Bartolomé, University of Valladolid, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Omkar Gupta, College of Agricultural Engineering & Technology, VNMKV, India.

(2) R Vijay Kumar, Acharya Nagarjuna University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Omkar Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R Vijay Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA