Peer Review History: Composition of Flavour Non Volatile Compound Steamed Gourami (Osphronemus gouramy)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, Research Professor, State University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Wapwera Augustine Jidimma, University of Jos, Nigeria.

(2) Zaied Omran Mosaa, University of Babylon, Iraq.

(3) J. M. Koli, DBSKKV, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rosnita Muhammad, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Wafai Z. A. Mikhail, Cairo University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Wapwera Augustine Jidimma, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Zaied Omran Mosaa, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Characteristics (Yield, Moisture Content, Water Absorption, Ph, and Organoleptic) of Catfishflour (Pangasius hypophthalmus)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Matheus Ramalho de Lima, Professor, Federal University Rural Semi Arid Region, Mossoró, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Lozenka Ivanova, University “Ss. Cyril and Methodius”, North Macedonia.

(2) Dalia Ashraf Abdel-Moneam Ahmed, Cairo University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anil Savji  Kotiya, College of Fisheries Science, Kamdhenu University, India.

(2) Ashwani K. Dhingra, Guru Gobind Singh College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Moh. Su’I, Widyagama University of Malang, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Alfonso Benítez de la Torre, México.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Lozenka Ivanova, North Macedonia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Dalia Ashraf Abdel-Moneam Ahmed, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Retroperitoneal Non-functioning Paraganglioma: A Case Report with Review of Literature

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Kewithinwangbo Newme, AIIMS, India.

(2) A. Vijaya Anand, Bharathiar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Eduardo Blanco Faramiñán, Hospital San José de Melipilla, Chile.

(2) Rajat Choudhari, SMS Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kewithinwangbo Newme, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (A. Vijaya Anand, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Relationship between Duration of Diabetes Mellitus and Gensini Score in Patients Undergoing Diagnostic Coronary Angiography

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, Assistant Professor, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nadu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sindhu Reddy Avula, University of Kansas Medical Center, USA.

(2) Lorenzo Martini, University of Siena, Italy.

(3) Byron Eduardo Coello-Viñán, Ecuador.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Manal Abdulmunem Ibrahim, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(2) Samreen Riaz, University of the Punjab, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sindhu Reddy Avula, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Lorenzo Martini, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Byron Eduardo Coello-Viñán, Ecuador) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Non Enzymatic Status in Antioxidant Capital in Senegalese Type 2 Diabetics

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Former Professor, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, Sriperumbudur, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Omnia Mohamed Helmy Mohamed Kamel, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Peter O Anaja, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria.

(3) Astrida Velena, Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Latvia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ria Ceriana, Akademi Farmasi YPPM Mandiri, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Omnia Mohamed Helmy Mohamed Kamel, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Peter O Anaja, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Astrida Velena, Latvia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Molecular Marker and Test Cross Information Aid Selective Advancement of F4 Generation of CB174R/Azucena: An inter Sub-specific Cross in Rice for Restorer Development

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Metropolitan Autonomous University Iztapalapa Campus, Av. San Rafael Atlixco 186 México City, México.

Reviewers:

(1) Aba-Toumnou Lucie, University of Bangui, Central African Republic.

(2) Walaa Abdel-Kader Ramadan Ibrahim, Biotechnology Institute, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Taghreed  El sayed Eissa, ARC, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Imene Djelloul, Ecole Supérieure des Sciences Appliquées d’Alger, Algeria.

(2) Prince Emmanuel Norman, Sierra Leone Agricultural Research Institute (SLARI), Sierra Leone.

(3) Sudhanand Prasad Lal, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Aba-Toumnou Lucie, Central African Republic) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Walaa Abdel-Kader Ramadan Ibrahim, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Analysis of Impact of COVID -19 on Agriculture, Horticulture Crops and Livetocks in Krishna District, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Prabowo Tjitropranoto, IPB University, Indonesia.

(2) Nikola Radivojevic, Serbia.

(3) H J. Mustafa Bin Dakian, Universiti Tun Abdul Razak, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Daniel Moise, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania.

(2) Satyanarayana Turangi, Christ (Deemed to be University), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Prabowo Tjitropranoto, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nikola Radivojevic, Serbia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (H J. Mustafa Bin Dakian, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Integrated Weed Management Practices on Growth, Physiology and Yield of Direct Sown Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Ioana Grozea, King Michael I of Romania” in University of Life Sciences, Timisoara, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahthasham Sajid, Baluchistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management Sciences, Pakistan.

(2) Supparang Ruangvanich, Chandrakasem Rajabhat University, Thailand.

(3) Ghassan Jayed Zaidan, Tikrit University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anang Susanto, Merdeka University, Indonesia.

(2) Darwin Pangaribuan, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia.

(3) Georgeta Serban, University of Oradea, Romania.

(4) Nisha Rana, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, India.

(5) Olifir Yurii, National Academy of Agrarian Sciences, Ukraine.

(6) Onwudebelu  Ugochukwu, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Ndufu Alike, Nigeria.

(7) Prince Emmanuel Norman, Sierra Leone Agricultural Research Institute (SLARI), Sierra Leone.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Abdelmonnem S. Kahlel, Northern Technical  University, Iraq.

(2) S.Kannadhasan, Study World College of Engineering, India.

(3) P.Shanthi, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ahthasham Sajid, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Supparang Ruangvanich, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Ghassan Jayed Zaidan, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Utilization of Bifunctional Catalyst for Biodiesel Production from Palm Kernel Oil

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Yong X. Gan, Professor, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Murat Aydin, Adıyaman University, Turkiye.

(2) M. Naveenkumar, Easwari Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rebhi Redha, University of Medea, Algeria.

(2) Siti Roshayu Hassan, UMK, Malaysia.

(3) Thamer Ahmed Mohammed, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(4) T.Sundar, Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswathi Viswa Mahavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Debrayan Bravo Hidalgo, Central University of Ecuador, Ecuador.

(2) K. S. Muthupandian, Institute of Cost Accountants of India, India.

(3) M. F. Nawas, South Eastern University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Murat Aydin, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (M. Naveenkumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mediating Effect of Inflation on the Relationship between Earnings and Share Prices of Listed Firms in Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Giuli Giguashvili, Gori State University, Georgia.

(2) Sudindra V R, International School of Management Excellence, India.

(3) E.M. Naresh Babu, ABBS School of Management, India.

(4) Emmanuel Dodzi Kutor Havi, Methodist University, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Wachira Boonyanet, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Giuli Giguashvili, Georgia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sudindra V R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (E.M. Naresh Babu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Emmanuel Dodzi Kutor Havi, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA