Editor(s):
Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
The peer review history will be available very soon.
Editor(s):
Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
The peer review history will be available very soon.
Editor(s):
Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
The peer review history will be available very soon.
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.
Reviewers:
(1) Gana Pati Ojha, Agricultural and Forestry University, Nepal.
(2) Jose Maanuel Salum Tome, Universidad Catolica De Temuco, Chile.
(3) J. Vasanthakumar, Annamalai University, India.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gana Pati Ojha, Nepal) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jose Maanuel Salum Tome, Chile) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (J. Vasanthakumar, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Editor(s):
(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.
Reviewers:
(1) Malepati S N V S Sripriya Bhargavi, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.
(2) Borozan Aurica, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timisoara, Romania.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Malepati S N V S Sripriya Bhargavi, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Borozan Aurica, Romania) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Carlos Humberto Martins, State University of Maringá, Brazil.
Reviewers:
(1) Parasa Lakshmi Naga Saroja, College of Engineering, Andhra University, India.
(2) Naveen G M, Government Engineering College, India.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Parasa Lakshmi Naga Saroja, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Naveen G M, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Danilo Costarelli, Associate Professor, University of Perugia, Italy.
Reviewers:
(1) Ali Yekkehkhany, University of Texas at Dallas, United States of America.
(2) Sonia Maria D’Souza, New Horizon College of Engineering, India.
(3) Carlos Henrique Tognon, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Yekkehkhany, United States of America) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sonia Maria D’Souza, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Carlos Henrique Tognon, Brazil) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.
Reviewers:
(1) Khwairakpam Goutam Singh, Mizoram University, India.
(2) Md. Aktar-Uz-Zaman, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Bangladesh.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khwairakpam Goutam Singh, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Md. Aktar-Uz-Zaman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Editor(s):
(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.
Reviewers:
(1) Arnaldo Esquivel FariNa, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, Paraguay.
(2) Krishna Kumar, Galgotias University, India.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arnaldo Esquivel FariNa, Paraguay) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Krishna Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Editor(s):
Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
The peer review history will be available very soon.
Editor(s):
(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.
Reviewers:
(1) Anannya Dhar, Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda Educational and Research Institute Narendrapur, India.
(2) Muhammad Sajjad, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.65/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anannya Dhar, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Sajjad, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA