Peer Review History: Enhancing Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) Productivity through Good Agricultural Practices in Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Chennamadhava, Banaras Hindu University, India.

(2) Yashaswini Sharna, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Chennamadhava, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yashaswini Sharna, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Drone Technology in Agricultural Practices: A SWOC Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Shilpi R. Sindhu, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(2) Jay Singh, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shilpi R. Sindhu, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jay Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Prospective Observational Study on the Clinical Profile Assessment of Myocardial Infarction Patients in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Anurag Rawat, Himalayan Institute of Medical Science, India.

(2) Alefiya Pitolwala Kaidbhai, Gujarat technological University, India.

(3) K Karthick, The Tamilnadu Dr MGR Medical University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anurag Rawat, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alefiya Pitolwala Kaidbhai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (K Karthick, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prediction of Lead Molecule Esculetin of Tridax procumbens against Zika Virus Envelope Protein

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hasssanien, Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Vitthal Vishram Chopade, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(2) Abdul Ashik Khan, Darjeeling Government College, India.

(3) Kayode Raheem, University of Nebraska Medical Center, United State of America.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vitthal Vishram Chopade, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdul Ashik Khan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kayode Raheem, United State of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Abdul Ashik Khan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_3_v1 (Kayode Raheem, United State of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Improving the Photo-catalytic Efficiency of TiO2 by Incorporation of Cobalt for Removal of Micropollutants from Wastewater

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Yong X. Gan, California State Polytechnic University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Dachepalli Ravinder, Basheerbagh Osmania University, India.

(2) Aloke Verma, Kalinga University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dachepalli Ravinder, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aloke Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Real-Time Data Governance and Compliance in Cloud-Native Robotics Systems

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

(2) Prof. Hamdy Mohy El-Din Afefy, Tanta University, Egypt.

(3) Prof. Hasan Köten, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Türkiye.

Reviewers:

(1) Lalu P. George, SCMS School of Technology and Management, India.

(2) Padmaavathy. Pa, Ahalia School of Management, University of Calicut, India.

(3) R Yamini, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(4) Yijie Weng, University of Maryland College Park, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lalu P. George, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Padmaavathy. Pa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (R Yamini, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Yijie Weng, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Predicting Natural Gas Production in Various Nations Using a Fractional Grey Bernoulli Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. K J. Sreekanth, Research Scientist, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR), Kuwait.

Reviewers:

(1) Kufre Jerome Udoudo, Nigeria.

(2) J.Jasmine Christina Magdalene, Bishop Heber College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kufre Jerome Udoudo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (J.Jasmine Christina Magdalene, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Estimation of Marketed Surplus and Marketing Efficiency of Milk in Andhra Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dalong Guo, College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Henan University of Science and Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) D.A.Nithya Shree, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, India.

(2) C.K. Goyal, Devi Ahilya University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.25/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (D.A.Nithya Shree, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (C.K. Goyal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Growth and Economic Return of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under Different Plant Spacing and Fertility Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Shahira H. EL-Moslamy, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute, City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications, Egypt.

(2) Rajesh Kanwar, College of Agriculture, CSKHPKV, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shahira H. EL-Moslamy, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajesh Kanwar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Detailed Analysis and Estimation of Therapy Net Benefit through Multi Regression Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, School of Life Science, Xuzhou Normal University, Xuzhou City, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Michael Mncedisi Willie, South Africa.

(2) Kemal Surji, Hawler Medical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Michael Mncedisi Willie, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kemal Surji, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA