Peer Review History: Comparative Evaluation of Sutherlandia frutescens and Tulbaghia violacea Antioxidant Potential

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arulselvan Palanisamy, Adjunct Associate Professor, Muthayammal Centre for Advanced Research (MCAR), Muthayammal College of Arts and Science, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Anup S Hendre, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed To Be University, India.

(2) Mariana Luiza de Oliveira Santos Ramos, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil.

(3) Zaizafoon Nabeel Nasif, Mohstansaryah University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dalia M. Jamil, Al_ Nahrain University, Iraq.

(2) Dobrin Aurora, University of Agronomic Sciences And Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, Romania.

(3) Khanin Pathak, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(4) Mrunalini R Kanvinde, D Y Patil Medical College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anup S Hendre, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mariana Luiza de Oliveira Santos Ramos, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Zaizafoon Nabeel Nasif, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Rice Value Chain Programme on Rice Production in the Gambia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vijayakhader, Professor, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(2) Dr. Uttara Singh, Assistant Professor, Govt. Home Science College, Panjab University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Junior Miranda Scheuer, University of the Republic, Uruguay.

(2) Mamadou Sanogo, Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aniketa Horo, Gopal Narayan Singh University, India.

(2) Diakalidia Kouyate, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia.

(3) Kamal Kumar, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, India.

(4) Okwudili Bismarck Ibeagwa, Federal University of Technology Owerri, Nigeria.

(5) Saleh Isah Audu, Nasarawa State University, Nigeria.

(6) Ir. Semuel Leunufna, Pattimura University, Indonesia.

(7) Sharaniya Vijitharan, University of Vavuniya, Sri Lanka.

(8) Sunday Alagba Obazi, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nigeria.

(9) Suvangi Rath, Odisha University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

(10) Christiana Ogonna Igberi, Alex Ekwueme Federal University, Nigeria.

(11) Cornel Anyisile Kibona, Mwalimu Julius K Nyerere University of Agriculture and Technology, Tanzania.

(12) Eleni Kaimakoudi, Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Greece.

(13) Ganiyu, Lukman, Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria, Nigeria.

(14) E. O. Haruna, Kogi State University, Nigeria.

(15) Sittal Thapa, Punjab Agricultural University, Nepal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Junior Miranda Scheuer, Uruguay) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mamadou Sanogo, Belgium) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Growth Performance of Albino Rats Orally Administered with Honey from Apis mellifera adansonii and Refined Sugar at Varying Levels

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Viduranga Y. Waisundara, Australian College of Business & Technology, Sri Lanka.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajesh Kumar, Himachal Pradesh University, India.

(2) Aderemi Moses Adewale, Alvan Ikoku Federal College of Education, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Archana Gaur T, India.

(2) Cristina B. Colloca, Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego (UNTDF), Argentina.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rajesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Aderemi Moses Adewale, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Selection of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Cocoa and Cassava Fermentation as Potential Probiotic for Pathogenic Microorganisms Control in Poultry Farming

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bechan Sharma, University of Allahabad, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mariana Nougalli Roselino, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil.

(2) Bipin Chaurasia, Bhawani Hospital and Research Centre, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Suresh Raghunathrao Kagne, Badrinarayan Barwale College, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, India.

(2) A. Balasubramaniam, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India.

(3) Agnes Sri Harti, Kusuma Husada University of Surakarta, Indonesia.

(4) Bianca Seridan, Luxembourg.

(5) Chin-Fa Hwang, Hungkuang University, Taiwan.

(6) Duongruitai Nicomrat, Rajamangala University of Technology, Thailand.

(7) Elhassan BENYAGOUB, Mohammed TAHRI University of Bechar, Algeria.

(8) Hugo Calixto Fonseca, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

(9) Kieko Saito, University of Shizuoka, Japan.

(10) Mahendrakumar Ramrang Dubey, Dharmsinh Desai University, India.

(11) Neethu Asokan, Sacred Heart College, India.

(12) Uyen Nguyen, Institute of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Vietnam.

(13) Vineet  Prakash Singh, Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, India.

(14) Zahra’a Abdulraheem Ahmed, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mariana Nougalli Roselino, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Bipin Chaurasia, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Resistance and Application of the Biomass from Fusarium solani in the Removal of Pentachlorophenol in Aqueous Solution

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mazen Saleh, Associate Professor, Laurentian University, Canada.

Reviewers:

(1) Darren Dookeeram, School of Pharmacy, University of the West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago.

(2) Narges Omrani, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(3) Omali Yousef El-Khawaga, Egypt.

(4) Montaser Fawzy Abdel-Monaim, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B. K. Uphade, Padmashri Vikhe Patil College of Arts, Science and Commerce, India.

(2) Huifang Xie, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, China.

(3) Rania Aydi Ben Abdallah, Regional Research Centre on Horticulture and Organic Agriculture, Tunisia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.63/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Darren Dookeeram, Trinidad and Tobago) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Narges Omrani, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Omali Yousef El-Khawaga, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Montaser Fawzy Abdel-Monaim, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Growth, Productivity, Economics, and Water Use Efficiency of Rabi Castor (Ricinus communis) as Influenced by Drip Fertigation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anthony R. Lupo, Professor, University of Missouri, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Parag Babaji Jadhav, Skymet Weather Services Pvt Ltd, India.

(2) Leong Kah Hon, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia.

(3) Shakila Banu.M, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lennin, Kenya.

(2) Narayan Lal, ICAR-IISS, India.

(3) Nsangou Nchare Abdoulaye, University Paris Saclay, France.

(4) Zafar H. Hashmi, Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology (NIAB), Pakistan.

(5) Angel Ramon Sanchez Delgado, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Parag Babaji Jadhav, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Leong Kah Hon, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Shakila Banu. M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Ridge and Furrow Method of Planting on Groundnut Yield Attributes in Chittoor District of Andhra Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Hassan  A. Ennab, Horticulture Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

(2) Otiobo Atibita Esther Nadine, The University of Bamenda, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Hassan A. Ennab, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Otiobo Atibita Esther Nadine, Cameroon) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Variations in Serum Levels of Uric Acid, Urea, Creatinine, Potassium and Sodium in Exposed Male Paint Workers in Owerri, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rodolfo Valtuille, Professor, Salvador University, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Soumik Ghosh, Banaras Hindu University, India.

(2) Anup S Hendre, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Deemed To Be University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Soumik Ghosh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Anup S Hendre, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Peer Review History: To Study the Violence Experienced by Postgraduate Resident Doctors and Interns in a Tertiary Care Centre in Aurangabad

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Merab Tsagareli, Beritashvili Center of Experimental Biomedicine, Georgia.

Reviewers:

(1) Paul Andrew Bourne, Northern Caribbean University, Jamaica.

(2) Larry Hill, Prairie View A&M University, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nadikuda Sunil Kumar, Osmania Medical College &Hospital, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Paul Andrew Bourne, Jamaica) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Larry Hill, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: The Population Density Map of the Greater Cairo Region Comparison of 2017 Choropleth Map and Dasymetric Map

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Armando Garcia Chiang, Professor, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) D. Naresh Kumar, St. Martin’s Engineering College, India.

(2) S S Patil, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Wawa Abe Enock, University of Nairobi, Kenya.

(2) Abdelkhalek Ibrahim Alastal, Islamic University, Palestine.

(3) Abdulhaq Hadi Abedali, Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

(4) Adi Tonggiroh, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia.

(5) Fernando Fonseca Cruz, Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias de Lisboa, Portugal.

(6) K. Ambiga, India.

(7) S. Muthusamy, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, India.

(8) Wael Shahadha Abdul Kareem, Al-Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage:8 /10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (D. Naresh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (S S Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA