Peer Review History: The Effect of Different Genres of Music on Blood Pressure among Different Age Groups

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Aline Margioti Zanella, Aline Zanella Rehabilitation Clinic, Brazil.

(2) Samira Ebrahim Aboalizm, Menoufia University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Carlos Antonio Dóro, Federal University of Paraná, Brazil.

(2) Ronny Anderson de Oliveira Cruz, University Centre João Pessoa – UNIPÊ, Brasil.

(3) Tatiane Michel, Federal University of Paraná, Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Aline Margioti Zanella, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Samira Ebrahim Aboalizm, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Decryption of DNA and Its Role in Treating Genetic Disorder at Early Stage

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Hafiza Sidra Yaseen, COMSATS University Islamabad Lahore Campus, Pakistan.

(2) Azza Anwar Abou-Arab, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anil Kumar, Government V.Y.T.PG. Autonomous College, India.

(2) Anna Jakubska-Busse, University of Wroclaw, Poland.

(3) Bhawna Bhimte, Gandhi Medical College, India.

(4) Jurandyr Santos Nogueira, Federal University of Bahia – Polytechnic School, Brazil

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Hafiza Sidra Yaseen, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Azza Anwar Abou-Arab, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Study of Controlled Release of Nano Particle Liquid Medicated Formulation using the RP-HPLC Method for Determination of Norethindrone into Dissolution Media

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Basima Ahmed Abed Al-Hadi Saleem, Mosul University, Iraq.

(2) Liliek Nurhidayati, Pancasila University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ersin Demir, Afyonkarahisar Health Science Universitry, Turkey.

(2) Mahgoub Ibrahim Shinger, International University of Africa, Sudan.

(3) Monika Rathee, World College of Medical Sciences and Research, India.

(4) CH Narasimha Raju BH, Vagdevi College of Pharmacy, India.

(5) Rakesh Tiwle, Patanjali Arogya Kendra, India.

(6) Sebaey Mahgoub, Children’s Cancer Hospital, Egypt.

(7) Solomon Demissie Dinku, Arba Micnh University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Basima Ahmed Abed Al-Hadi Saleem, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Liliek Nurhidayati, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An in vitro Evaluation of Effect of Remineralising Potential of Marine Skeletal Specie Meretrixmeretrix Extract on Human Enamel

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) T P Kannan, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Antonella Polimeni, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nasibe Aycan Yilmaz, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Turkey.

(2) Sabeen Masood, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine, Pakistan.

(3) Saranbabu K. A, Ntruhs, India.

(4) Tew In Meei, The National University of Malaysia, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (T P Kannan, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Antonella Polimeni, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Antiasthmatic Activity of Eraippu Noi Chooranam (ENC)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Lenin, Prasad V.Potluri Siddhartha Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Bhavya B. M, Central Ayurveda Research Institute Bengaluru, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anubha Dubey, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (K. Lenin, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Bhavya B. M, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Coherence Tests of Physical Theories

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lei Zhang, Winston-Salem State University, North Carolina, USA.

(2) Dr. Roberto Oscar Aquilano, School of Exact Science, National University of Rosario (UNR), Rosario, Physics Institute (IFIR)(CONICET-UNR), Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Harun-Or-Roshid, Pabna University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh.

(2) Vipin Jain, CSIR-National Physical Laboratory, Dr. K.S. Krishnan Marg, India.

(3) Akihito Kikuchi, Japan.

(4) Koustubh Ajit Supriya Kabe, Mumbai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hova Hoavo, University of Kara, Togo.

(2) Manu Mitra, University of Bridgeport, USA.

(3) Nebras Rada Mohammed, Al-Turath University College, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Harun-Or-Roshid, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Vipin Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Akihito Kikuchi, Japan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Koustubh Ajit Supriya Kabe, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Overview and Future Perspectives on Bone 3D Bioprinting

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ekansh Rathoria, Hind Institute of Medical Sciences Safedabad, India.

(2) P. Muthu, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ekansh Rathoria, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (P. Muthu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prevalence of Joint Hypermobility in Adolescent Females

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Golder N Wilson, Texas Tech University, USA.

(2) Summaiya Zareen Shaikh, MUHS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Golder N Wilson, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Summaiya Zareen Shaikh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development and Evaluation of Extended Release Tacrolimus Tablets by Melt Granulation in Combination with Magnesium Alumino Metasilicate

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giulio Tarro, Professor & President, Foundation T. & L. de Beaumont Bonelli for cancer Research, Napoli, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Shaik Firoz, Sree Vidyanikethan College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Arshad Farid, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shaik Firoz, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Arshad Farid, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Relationship between Students’ Attitude towards Mathematics and their Achievement in Mathematics

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ana Claudia Tenor, Brazil.

(2) Phub Dorji, Gedu College of Business Studies, Royal University of Bhutan, Bhutan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nageena Nazir, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Science and Technology, India.

(2) Saeed Nosratabadi, University of Public Service, Hungary.

(3) Shashi Verma, Shri Ram Murti Smarak College of Engineering & Technology , India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ana Claudia Tenor, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Phub Dorji, Bhutan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA