Peer Review History: Unveiling the Spectacular Performance of Diverse Chrysanthemum Varieties in Flowering, Quality and Yield

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Dasari Sravani, Aditya College of Engineering and Technology, Kakinada.

(2) Karthik D R, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.47/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dasari Sravani, Kakinada) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Karthik D R, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analyzing the Role of Different Molybdenum doses and Rhizobium Inoculation in Optimizing Nutrient Absorption and Yield in Vegetable Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] cv. AVCP 1

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Maria Teresa Federici, National Institute of Agronomic Research, Uruguay.

(2) Indranil Das, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Khadeeja Ahmed Sido, Duhok University, Iraq.

(2) Juan Hernández Ävila, Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo, México.

(3) Zeinab Alywe Mohammed Al-Tememe, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

(4) Hassan Hadi Alkarawi, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(5) João Rufino De Freitas Filho, Rural Federal University of Pernambuco/UFRPE, Brazil.

(6) S.Mohandas, Agrl. College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agrl. University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maria Teresa Federici, Uruguay) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Indranil Das, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Phyto-extracts for the Management of Alternaria Leaf Blight of Cluster Bean (Cyamopsidis tetragonoloba L.) Caused by Alternaria cucumerina

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Joenil G. Frayco, North Eastern Mindanao State University, Philippines.

(2) Bhukya Srinivas, NAU,  India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) N. Irabanta singh, Manipur Central University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Joenil G. Frayco, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bhukya Srinivas, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Seed Yield, Seed Attributes and Economics of Alfalfa Seed Production as Influenced by Integrated Nutrient Management During kharif Season under Southern Dry Zone of Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Himanshu Verma, College of Agriculture & Environmental Technology, Surajmal University, India.

(2) Stuti Debapriya Behera, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Siksha O Anusandhan University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Himanshu Verma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Stuti Debapriya Behera, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Efficacy of Bio-Agents in Managing Root Rot of Okra Caused by Rhizoctonia solani

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) N.H. Shankar Reddy, Kadiri Baburao College of Agriculture and Horticulture, India.

(2) Paras Shah, Hainan University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Zaheen Hasan, M.L.K.(P.G.) College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N.H. Shankar Reddy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Paras Shah, China) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Divergence Analysis for Quantitative Traits in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Germplasm under Irrigated Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Vanya Bawa, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, India.

(2) Aladji Abatchoua Madi MadiIbram, University of Ngaoundere, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Manisha Kumari, India.

(2) Mohamad Aarif, Lt. MCM College of Agriculture, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vanya Bawa, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aladji Abatchoua Madi MadiIbram, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita Infecting Tuberose by Using Bioformulations under Field Condition

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammad Reza Naroui Rad, Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Iran.

(2) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Junaid, The University of Agriculture Peshawar, Pakistan.

(2) Ayyandurai M, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Junaid, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ayyandurai M, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Spectrum of Gastric Carcinoma in a Tertiary Care Centre with Special Reference to PDL1 and Cyciln D1

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ida Bagus Budhi Surya Adnyana, Associate Professor, Dr. Moewardi General Teaching Hospital, Indonesia, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Niyaz Ahmad Naikoo, Govt. Degree College, University of Kashmir, India.

(2) Atsushi Horiuchi, Ehime Prefectural Niihama Hospital, Japan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Niyaz Ahmad Naikoo, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Atsushi Horiuchi, Japan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Influence of Obesity on Quality of Life: A Systematic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nicolás Padilla-Raygoza, Institute of Public Health from Guanajuato State, México.

Reviewers:

(1) Kashish Pandey, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research, India.

(2) Vivek Kumar Shahi, Digvijai Nath Post Graduate College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amrutkuvar Shivaji Rayjade, D. Y. Patil College of Physiotherapy, India.

(2) Lamiaa Abd El Hakeem Ali, Cairo University, Egypt.

(3) Thangamani ramalingam alagappan, Veer narmad south Gujarat university, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kashish Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vivek Kumar Shahi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Spacing and Ratooning on Growth and Yield of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) Var. Lal Bhendi No. 533

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Narender Kumar, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(2) Rajkishore Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chilakamari Lokesh, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University, India.

(2) Fredrick Akaliche Ochami, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Narender Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajkishore Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA