Peer Review History: Hepatoprotective Investigation of Ficus lyrataand Ficus elastic Leaves Extract

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sirigireddy Sivajothi, College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Richard Sedeafor, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

(2) Shuchi Dave, Guru Ramdas Khalsa Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(3) Mujeeb Ur Rahman, Alwar Pharmacy College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Richard Sedeafor, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shuchi Dave, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mujeeb Ur Rahman, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Insight into the Lived Experiences of Medical College Women Post-pandemic

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Gustavo Henrique Silva de Souza, Federal Institute of The North of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

(2) Dr. Bakare Kazeem Kayode, Associate Professor, School of Education and Human Sciences, Albukhary International University, Malaysia.

(3) Dr. Shao-I Chiu, Associate Professor, Da-Yeh University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Kritika Chaudhary, Delhi University, India.

(2) Bommuluri Bhavana Rao, School of Law, UPES, India.

(3) Fortunate Mandipaka, Nelson Mandela University, South Africa.

(4) Bishnu Maya Joshi, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.63/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kritika Chaudhary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bommuluri Bhavana Rao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Fortunate Mandipaka, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Bishnu Maya Joshi, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v3 and Feedback v3 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biomass Energy from Agricultural Waste: Evaluating Groundnut Vines and Pumpkin Straws for Combustion Performance

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. K J. Sreekanth, Research Scientist, Energy and Building Research Center (EBRC), Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR), Kuwait.

Reviewers:

(1) Adham Norkobilov, Tashkent Institute of Chemical Technology, Uzbekistan.

(2) Jhonatan Willian Moreira, Federal University of Goias, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adham Norkobilov, Uzbekistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jhonatan Willian Moreira, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Magnetized Irrigation and its Potential in Sustainable Agriculture: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Muinat Nike Lewu, South Africa.

(2) Abhishree Ramchandra, College of Agriculture, UAS, GKVK, India.

(3) Utsav Bhandari, Utah State University, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muinat Nike Lewu, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abhishree Ramchandra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Utsav Bhandari, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_3_v1 (Utsav Bhandari, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Correlation among Yield, Quality and Mechanization Amicable Traits in Sugarcane Clones

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-Sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Ayad M.J. Al-Mamoori, Iraq.

(2) Ruchuon Wanna, Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ayad M.J. Al-Mamoori, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ruchuon Wanna, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Cytochrome P450 (CYP1A2) Genetic Polymorphism as a Genetic Marker for Treatment Outcome in Early Breast Cancer Patients

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Barbara Giambene, Al Emadi Hospital, Doha, Qatar.

Reviewers:

(1) Arvind Kumar Shukla, Pusan National University, South Korea.

(2) Hassan Shora, Port-Said University, Egypt.

(3) Huda Zuheir Majeed, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arvind Kumar Shukla, South Korea) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hassan Shora, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Huda Zuheir Majeed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comprehensive Survey of Machine Learning Techniques for Seizure Detection and Prediction: Challenges and Future Directions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Leo Willyanto Santoso, Assistant Professor, Petra Christian University, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) J. Ebenesar Anna Bagyam, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, India.

(2) D. Hemanand, S.A. Engineering College, India.

(3) A. Kalaivani, Nallamuthu Gounder Mahalingam College, India.

(4) Shatha M. Ali, Ninevah University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (J. Ebenesar Anna Bagyam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (D. Hemanand, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (A. Kalaivani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Shatha M. Ali, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Income Analysis and Break-Even Point of Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) Business: A Case Study of the Lubuk Makmur and Tani Makmur Farmer Groups in Mugirejo Village, Samarinda City, Indonesia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. N. Karunakaran, People Institute of Management Studies (PIMS), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Abd El-Rahman Abd El-Raouf Ahmed, Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Mohammed Mahmood Ali, India.

(3) J. Vasanthakumar, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abd El-Rahman Abd El-Raouf Ahmed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Mahmood Ali, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (J. Vasanthakumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimizing Cereal Crop Performance with Nutrient Priming

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Assistant Professor, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Parashiva Murthy, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Laxman R. Rathod, Mahatma Phule A. S. C. College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Parashiva Murthy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Laxman R. Rathod, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Novel Method for Combination of Ionic Conductivity and pH-metry Methods for the Determination of the Aqueous Solubility of a New Diisopropylammonium Hydrogenmaleate Crystalline Molecule

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Richard Sawadogo, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Reviewers:

(1) N. Prudhvi Raju, B. V. Raju College, India.

(2) Sandeep Bhattacharjee, Amity School of Business, Amity University, India.

(3) Shivendra Agarwal, Vivekanand College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.53/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N. Prudhvi Raju, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sandeep Bhattacharjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shivendra Agarwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA