Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Assistant professor, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

(2) Dr. Fabio da Costa Henry, Associate Professor, State University of Northern of Rio de Janeiro, UENF, Brasil.

Reviewers:

(1) Kumud Das, Nowgong College, India.

(2) Dina A. Saad, University of Diyala, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kumud Das, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dina A. Saad, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Production deputy, Central Lab. for Research and Development of Date Palm, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

(2) Dr. Martha Isabel Torres-Moran, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Guadalajara, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Showket Ahmad Dar, India.

(2) Pooja C. Desai, Bhagwan Mahavir University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Showket Ahmad Dar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pooja C. Desai, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v3 and Feedback v3 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Kadhimiyah Jawad Abdullah Al-Mansor, Basra University, Iraq.

(2) Sadashiv V Nadukeri, KSN University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kadhimiyah Jawad Abdullah Al-Mansor, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sadashiv V Nadukeri, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Malar Kodi S., Assistant Professor, College of Nursing, All India Institutes of Medical Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Kishore Mukhopadhyay, Union Christian Training College, India.

(2) Ermia Maghsoodloo, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kishore Mukhopadhyay, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ermia Maghsoodloo, Iran) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. V. Jegadeeswari, Associate Professor, Horticultural College and Research Institute for Women, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Adeyinka Kehinde Adebayo, Institute of Agricultural Research and Training, Obafemi Awolowo University, Nigeria.

(2) Chudamani Pant, Agriculture and Forestry University, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adeyinka Kehinde Adebayo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chudamani Pant, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Serpil Ünver Saraydın, Associate Professor, Cumhuriyet University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Malar Kodi S, Assistant Professor, All India Institutes of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

(3) Dr. Emmanouil (Manolis) Magiorkinis, General Hospital for Chest Diseases “Sotiria”, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Shoebul Haque, King George’s Medical University, India.

(2) S.K.Mohanasundari, AIIMS Bibinagar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shoebul Haque, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S.K.Mohanasundari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. M. Aqil Burney, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Parameshwar V Pandit, Bangalore University, India.

(2) Nikolay Kyurkchiev, Paisii Hilendarski University of Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Parameshwar V Pandit, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nikolay Kyurkchiev, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Jorge A. Herrera Pino, Florida International University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Pradeep Vaideeswar, Seth GS Medical College, India.

(2) Vinod Kumar Singh Gautam, Institute of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences (IHBAS), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pradeep Vaideeswar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vinod Kumar Singh Gautam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wagner Loyola, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa) Concordia, Canada.

(2) Dr. Erich Cosmi, Associate Professor, University of Padua, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ishani Vajpai, Indian Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Sugandha Singh, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, India.

(3) Balaka Biswas, Indian Institute of Science Education Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ishani Vajpai, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sugandha Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Balaka Biswas, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veeramuthumari, Assistant Professor, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tabinda Ruby, Federal Urdu University of Arts, Sciences and Technology Karachi, Pakistan.

(2) Muhammad Wasim, Shunde Women and Children’s Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tabinda Ruby, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Wasim, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA