Peer Review History: Evaluation of Knowledge, Stigmatization and Treatment Methods on Lymphatic Filariasis in Suru Local Government Area of Kebbi State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hiba Riyadh  Al-Abodi, Assistant Professor, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Lawrence Chimbwali, University of Zambia, Zambia.

(2) Sagya Singh, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lawrence Chimbwali, Zambia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sagya Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Potential Impacts of Green Manure Incorporation on Soil Fertility Enhancement and Rice Yield

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alessandro Buccolieri, University of Salento, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Solange Uwingabire, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Rwanda.

(2) N. K. Jat, ICAR-CAZRI, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Solange Uwingabire, Rwanda) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N. K. Jat, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Case Series of Vesicovaginal Fistulae in Nizwa Hospital, Trend, Outcome and Review of Literature

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdelmonem Awad M. Hegazy, Zarqa University, Jordan.

Reviewers:

(1) Anila Mujadid Qureshi, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Pakistan.

(2) Ivo Faehnle, Switzerland.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anila Mujadid Qureshi, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 ((Ivo Faehnle, Switzerland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Perception of Educated Unemployed Rural Youth towards Entrepreneurial Activities for Self-employment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Gul Rukh Zahid, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

(2) Subash Kumar Bhattarai, Nepal Engineering College, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gul Rukh Zahid, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Subash Kumar Bhattarai, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Management of Nutrients in Soybean (Glycine max) Crops: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chung-Jen Chiang, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Purushothaman T, Shri Nehru Maha Vidyalaya, College of Arts & Science, India.

(2) Willames de Albuquerque Soares, University of Pernambuco, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Purushothaman T, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Willames de Albuquerque Soares, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nano Management Techniques for Soil Reclamation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Khalfa Ali, Associate Professor, University of Ain Temouchent, Algeria.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Ahmed Saqib, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) Eman Hamdy Abd El-Azeiz, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Ahmed Saqib, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eman Hamdy Abd El-Azeiz, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Integrated Organic and Inorganic Fertilizer on, Growth of Garlic (Allium sativum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Yasser Mohammad Mohammad Osman, Horticulture Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Mayur Arun Dongre, Shri Shivaji Vidya Prasarak Sanstha’s, Late Karmaveer Dr. P. R. Ghogrey Science College, Kavayitri Bahinabai Chaudhari North Maharashtra University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yasser Mohammad Mohammad Osman, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mayur Arun Dongre, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Advances in the Improvement of Oncidium History and Perspectives

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Senior Staff Scientist & Principal Researcher, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Dilip Kumar Verma, ICAR-IARI, India.

(2) Juan Camilo Ordonez Blanco, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Colombia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dilip Kumar Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Juan Camilo Ordonez Blanco, Colombia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In vitro Evaluation of Fungicides and Bio-rationals against Pestalotiopsis psidii Causing Guava Fruit Canker

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Sopialena, Mulawarman University, Indonesia.

(2) Nabakishor Nongmaithem, College of Agriculture, Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sopialena, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nabakishor Nongmaithem, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Two Biological Insecticides (Azadirachta indica and Bacillus thuringiensis) and a Chemical insecticide (Diflubenzuron WP) against Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Maize Crop, Western Bur

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chung-Jen Chiang, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Vignesh, Palar Agricultural College, India.

(2) Shiv Kumar Yadav, Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Vignesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shiv Kumar Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA