Peer Review History: An Investigation into Building Functional Failures in Akure South Local Government, Ondo State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bharatish A, Assistant Professor, RV College of Engineering, Bengaluru, India.

Reviewers:

(1) A. Ammari, Mohammed V University, Morocco.

(2) Suresh Kumar Chaudhary, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A. Ammari, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suresh Kumar Chaudhary, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Water Quality Assessment and its Impact on Shrimp in the Rupnarayan River: A Comparative Study from February to May of 2022-2024

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tarang Kumar Shah, Assistant Professor, DGCN College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, India.

(2) Dr. Rakpong Petkam, Assistant Professor, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.

(3) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Nikos Charizopoulos, Agricultural University of Athens, Greece.

(2) Horia Albu, Institute for Hygiene and Veterinary Public Health, Romania.

(3) Hadi Hamli, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nikos Charizopoulos, Greece) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Horia Albu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hadi Hamli, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Culture Feasibility, Domestication and Breeding Potentiality of Penaeus indicus in the Southwest Region of Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, Research Professor, State University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Bandana, India.

(2) Diane N.S. Kpogue Gangbazo, Université Nationale d’Agriculture, Bénin.

(3) Mbaye Tine, Gaston Berger University, Senegal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bandana, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Diane N.S. Kpogue Gangbazo, Bénin) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mbaye Tine, Senegal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Global Impacts of Extended COVID-19 Lockdowns: Intersecting Perspectives on Environmental Quality, Food Security, Human Health, and Societal Dynamics

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anthony R. Lupo, University of Missouri, USA.

(2) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

(3) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien (Retired), The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Zerrin Toprak Karaman, University of Dokuz, Türkiye.

(2) Jaya Banerjee, Yashoda Hospital, India.

(3) Peter Stallinga, University of The Algarve, Portugal.

(4) Javed Manzoor, Government Degree College Surankote, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.37/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zerrin Toprak Karaman, Türkiye) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jaya Banerjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Peter Stallinga, Portugal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Javed Manzoor, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Role of Probiotics and Prebiotics in Human Health: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Amal Hegazi Ahmed Elrefaei, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Raquel Soares Casaes Nunes, UFRJ, Brazil.

(2) Ishtiaq Ahmed, Isra University, Al-Nafees Medical Collage, Pakistan.

(3) R. Abdul Vahith, Jamal Mohamed College (Autonomous), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Raquel Soares Casaes Nunes, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ishtiaq Ahmed, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (R. Abdul Vahith, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Silkworm Gut Microflora as a Source: Biotechnological Applications

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University,Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Rakesh Kumar, Maharishi Markandeshwar (DU), India.

(2) France Anne Dias Ruas, Sao Paulo.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) France Anne Dias Ruas, Brazil, Ali Sher, Kuwait.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rakesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (France Anne Dias Ruas, Sao Paulo) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Antioxidant, Antibacterial, and Anti-hemolytic Properties of Ethanol Extract from Plectranthus barbatus Andrews (Lamiaceae) Leaves

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Nebi Bilir, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Siham Ferdjioui, Ferhat Abbas Setif-1, University, Algeria.

(2) Adel Ahmed Mohammed Saeed, University of Aden, Yemen.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Siham Ferdjioui, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Adel Ahmed Mohammed Saeed, Yemen) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Hepatoprotective and Anti-hyperlipidemic Effects of Ethanolic Extract of Terminalia arjuna in a High-fat-induced Hyperlipidemic Rat Model

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rachid Masrour, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Kuldip Chandra Verma, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

(2) Zeenath Banu, RBVRR Women’s College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Sushant Sud, ITRA, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kuldip Chandra Verma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zeenath Banu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sushant Sud, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antioxidant and DNA Damaging Protection of Some Herbal Supplements: In vitro & In silico Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Jegede Rotimi Jude, Adekunle Ajasin University, Nigeria.

(2) Pathakala Naveen, Anurag University, India.

(3) Shoheb Shaikh, Siddhi’s Institute of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jegede Rotimi Jude, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pathakala Naveen, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shoheb Shaikh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Leaf Area Index, Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Content Influences Yield and Quality of Nanasaheb Purple Seedless Grapes under Semi-arid Condition

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Noe Anes Garcia, University Oviedo, Spain.

(2) J. Madhusudhanan, Anand Institute of Higher Technology, Anna University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Noe Anes Garcia, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (J. Madhusudhanan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA