Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Emmanuel Chikalipa Pmaiz, The University of Zambia, Zambia.

(2) Lubao Wanyonyi Murere, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Emmanuel Chikalipa Pmaiz, Zambia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lubao Wanyonyi Murere, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, University of Veracruz, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Dmytro Chuiko, State Biotechnological University, Ukraine.

(2) Samuel Amiteye, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dmytro Chuiko, Ukraine) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samuel Amiteye, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Claudia Coelho, Assistant Professor, University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Pramod Kumar Mahish, Govt. Digvijay Postgraduate College, India.

(2) A.Seetha Devi, Hindu College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pramod Kumar Mahish, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A. Seetha Devi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Gehan Shaker Bakhoum, Agricultural and Biological Res. Institute, NRC, Egypt.

(2) Anuj Kumar Rai, Odisha University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gehan Shaker Bakhoum, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anuj Kumar Rai, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, Old Civil Hospital of Guadalajara “Fray Antonio Alcalde”, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Shivali Khandelwal, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, India.

(2) Mrunali Patel, Ganpat University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shivali Khandelwal, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mrunali Patel, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Nandini Saha, Veer Kunwar Singh College of Agriculture, India.

(2) Amelie L. Chico, UM Panabo College, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nandini Saha, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amelie L. Chico, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdullah Antaria, Indonesia.

(2) Tanane Omar, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdullah Antaria, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tanane Omar, Morocco) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Xingting Wang, Assistant Professor, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, USA.

(2) Prof. Palle E. T. Jorgensen, The University of Iowa, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) P. Chella Pandian, Vivekananda College, India.

(2) Soumak Biswas, India.

(3) Brahim Boudine, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Morocco.

(4) Kobara Kazukuni, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Japan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohd Azmi, Vignan Foundation for Science, Technology and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P. Chella Pandian, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Soumak Biswas, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Brahim Boudine, Morocco) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Kobara Kazukuni, Japan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Soumak Biswas, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Dhasarathan, Anna University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Hewa Kattuge Sameera Madusanka, The Open University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka.

(2) Mohd Norfaizal Bin Ghazalli, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hewa Kattuge Sameera Madusanka, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohd Norfaizal Bin Ghazalli, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nguyen Van Toan, Vietnam National University, Vietnam.

Reviewers:

(1) Vishal Ramchandra Patil, Dr. D. Y. Patil College of Agriculture, Mahatma Phule Agricultural University, India.

(2) Vaka Madhuri, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/110

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vishal Ramchandra Patil, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vaka Madhuri, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA