Peer Review History: Evaluating the Response of Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (L.) to Organic and Inorganic Fertilization in Makurdi, Southern Guinea Savannah, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Shiamala Devi Ramaiya, Lecturer, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Bintulu Sarawak Campus, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Pinar Adiguzel, Cukurova University, Turkiye.

(2) Kabita K. Shah, Pennsylvania State University, U.S.A.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pinar Adiguzel, Turkiye) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kabita K. Shah, U.S.A) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Length-weight Relationships and Condition Factors of Three Commercially Important Fish Species from Roseires Reservoir, Blue Nile, Sudan

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, Research Professor, State University of Sonora, Mexico.

(2) Dr. Matheus Ramalho de Lima, Associate Professor, Federal University of Semi-Arid Region, UFERSA, Brazil.

(3) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) P.A Vikas, CMFRI, India.

(2) Mohammed Gaber Desouky, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Egypt.

(3) Uduak Sylvanus Jacob, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashis Kumar Panigrahi, University of Kalyani, India.

(2) Basudev Mandal, Narajole Raj College, India.

(3) Praveen Ojha, Kishori Raman (PG) College, (Affiliated to Dr. B. R. Ambedkar University, Agra, UP, India), India.

(4) Ravindra Pawar, College of Fisheries (DBS Konkan Agricultural University), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P.A Vikas, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Gaber Desouky, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Uduak Sylvanus Jacob, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Registration of Medical Device in FDA, EU and CDSCO: Overview

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, College of Biomedical Sciences, Larkin University, USA.

(2) Prof. Erich Cosmi, University of Padua School of Medicine, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Stephen Dare Oloninefa, Kogi State University, Nigeria.

(2) Shakeel Ahmed Memon, SMBZAN Institute of Cardiology Quetta, Pakistan.

(3) Nitin Gautam, Indira Gandhi Govt. Dental College, India.

(4) Joyamma John, St. Thomas College, Ruabandha Bhilai Hemchand Yadav University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.225/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Stephen Dare Oloninefa, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shakeel Ahmed Memon, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nitin Gautam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Joyamma John, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Different Organic Manures on Morphological and Floral Attributes of Marigold (Tagetes erecta L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Rakesh Kumar, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Askar Ghanbari Odivi, Sharekord University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mukesh Chand Goyal, Agriculture University, India.

(2) Nicholas Barasa Oroni, Moiben Technical and Vocational College, Kenya.

(3) Suman Bagale, University of Alberta, Canada.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rakesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Askar Ghanbari Odivi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Journal_Change_ JSRR_1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Sweet Corn to Nano Urea under Precision Nitrogen Management

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Production Deputy, Central Lab. for Research and Development of Date Palm, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Chadetrik Rout, Maharishi Markandeshwar Deemed to be University, India.

(2) S.Jawahar, Dr. M. S. Swaminathan Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(3) Hegedus Cristina, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, România.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Asaad Zaeen, The University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Amit A. Shahane, India.

(3) Aparna Gunjal, Dr. D.Y. Patil, Arts, Commerce & Science College, India.

(4) Cardei Petru, Romania.

(5) Ghassen Abid, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chadetrik Rout, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Jawahar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hegedus Cristina, România) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Navigating Challenges: Groundnut Cropping Systems Realities in Tumkur District, Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Manuel Emilio Milla Pino, National University of Jaen, Peru.

(2) D’souza Myrene R., Mount Carmel College Autonomous, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Junir Antônio Lutinski, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manuel Emilio Milla Pino, Peru) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (D’souza Myrene R., India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Microsponge-based Topical Formulations Compared to Traditional Methods

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Randa Salah Juma Mahmoud, University of Zagazig, Egypt.

(2) Prof. Rafik Karaman, Distinguished Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

(3) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Shashikant Sudarshan Upadhye, Annasaheb Dange College of B. Pharmacy, India.

(2) Shrishail M Ghurghure, D.S.T.S. Mandal’s College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Sarika Ankushrao Nikam, DR D Y Patil College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shashikant Sudarshan Upadhye, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shrishail M Ghurghure, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sarika Ankushrao Nikam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Agricultural Commodity Forecasting: A Median-Based Combination of Time Series Models

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dalong Guo, College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Henan University of Science and Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Victor Musebe Namboka, Moi University, Kenya.

(2) Pankaj Das, Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Victor Musebe Namboka, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pankaj Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Cold Plasma Treatment on Seed Quality Parameters under Cold Stress in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bishun Deo Prasad, Assistant Professor, Bihar Agriculture College, Sabour, Bihar Agricultural University, Bihar, India.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Saravanan, Nandha Arts and Science College, India.

(2) Nguyen Quang Thinh, Field Crops Research Institute, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Saravanan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nguyen Quang Thinh, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antifungal Activity of Erigeron floribundus (Asteraceae) and Ripe Banana Peel-NaHCO3 Extracts on Tomato in South-Kivu/DRC-Albertan Rift in the Great Lakes Region, Central-Africa

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) K Sabina, Prince Shri Venkateshwara Arts and Science College, India.

(2) Dhananjay Pandey, Govt. Naveen Girls College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K Sabina, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dhananjay Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA