Peer Review History: Seed Germination and Subsequent Seedling Growth as Influenced by Silica Nanoparticles Invigoration in Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Anélia Marais, South Africa.

(2) Batrancea Larissa Margareta, Babes-Bolyai University, Romania.

(3) Codruța Mihaela Dobrescu, The National University of Science and Technology, Pitești University Centre, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anélia Marais, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Batrancea Larissa Margareta, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Codruța Mihaela Dobrescu, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influential Factors for the Spread of Mundu Chilli Cultivation in Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lanzhuang Chen, Minami Kyushu University, Miyazaki, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Aparna, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(2) Rajendragouda Patil, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aparna, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajendragouda Patil, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Seasonal Incidence of Spodoptera litura (Fab.) Infesting Groundnut with Respect to Leaf Damage

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ghemam Amara Djilani, University El Oued, Algeria.

(2) N.P. Pathan, College of Horticulture, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ghemam Amara Djilani, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N. P. Pathan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Biological Priming on Metabolomic and Molecular Changes in Response to Drought Stress in Brassica juncea

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Andrzej Kowalski, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Erasmo Jose Paioli Pires, Instituto Agronômico de Campinas, Brazil

(2) Calugar Anamaria, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj Napoca, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Erasmo Jose Paioli Pires, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Calugar Anamaria, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Characterization of Diverse Carrot (Daucus carota L.) Genotypes Using Long Noncoding RNA Based Microsatellite Markers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hayder Ali Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Veterinary Medicine College, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Sabaa Ali Mohammed Al. Fadal, Basrah University, Iraq.

(2) Arvind Kumar, AISECT University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sabaa Ali Mohammed Al. Fadal, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arvind Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on Assessing the Use of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Algorithms to Analyze ICU Data for Early Prediction of Patient

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wagner Loyola, Canada.

(2) Dr. Erich Cosmi, Associate Professor, University of Padua, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Preksha, T.John College of Nursing, India.

(2) Piyush Raja, Lingaya’s Vidyapeeth, India.

(3) Shilpa Bajaj, I.K. Gujral Punjab Technical University, India.

(4) Mayur Rasiklal Yadav, Western University of Health Sciences, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.38/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Preksha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Piyush Raja, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shilpa Bajaj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Mayur Rasiklal Yadav, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Machine Learning Model for Network Anomaly Detection: Support Vector Machine

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) C. M. Nalayini, Velammal Engineering College, India.

(2) Ahmed H. Ali, Iraq.

(3) E.Sandhya, Madanapalle Institute of Technology & Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (C. M. Nalayini, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmed H. Ali, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (E. Sandhya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Determinants of Food Insecurity among Smallholder Farming Households in Southwest Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. N. Karunakaran, Principal and Research Guide in Economics, People Institute of Management Studies (PIMS), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Giovanni Guimaraes Landa, Centro Universitario Vale do Cricare, Brazil.

(2) Ganesh Das, Coochbehar Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chanate Ratanaubol, Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin, Thailand.

(2) Himanshu Rastogi, Amity University Uttar Pradesh-Lucknow Campus, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Giovanni Guimaraes Landa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ganesh Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Morphology of Adherent Cells of the Line Vero Cultivated in a Three-Dimensional Environment inside a Microfluidic Device Differs from their Morphology when Cultivated in Monolayers

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Mississipi, USA and Associate Professor, Staff Orthopedic Surgeon GV Montgomery Va Medical Center, University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Abu Md Ashif Ikbal, Assam University, India.

(2) Sujith Sri Surya R, SRM Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, India.

(3) Bibhas Kumar Bhunia, GSMST, IIT Kanpur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abu Md Ashif Ikbal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sujith Sri Surya R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bibhas Kumar Bhunia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mechanical Properties and Engineering Applications of Flexural and Tensile Properties in Materials Science

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aleksey Khlopytskyi, Associate Professor, Ukrainian State University of Chemical Technology, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Jayadev, SJB Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Sagar K G, Jain Deemed To Be University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arpita Maji, National Institute of Technology Andhra Pradesh, India.

(2) Mahesh A Kori, VTU, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jayadev, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sagar K G, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA