Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Armel Hervé Nwabo Kamdje, Assistant Professor, University of Ngaoundere, Cameroon.

Reviewers:

(1) Krishnaveni Iyengar, L.A.D.College for Women, R.T.M.Nagpur University, India.

(2) B.R. Pandey, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Krishnaveni Iyengar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B. R. Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sunil Kumar, Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) Mudigiri Chandana, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sunil Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mudigiri Chandana, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nguyen Van Toan, School of Biotechnology, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Reviewers:

(1) Anam Arshad, Quiad e Azam University, Pakistan.

(2) Shafqat Ali, School of Environment and Civil Engineering,  Dongguan University of Technology, China.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anam Arshad, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shafqat Ali, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, College of Biomedical Sciences, Larkin University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Desmond Nkrumah, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

(2) Bahareh Allahverdi Mamaghani, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Desmond Nkrumah, Ghana) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bahareh Allahverdi Mamaghani, Iran) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hayder Ali Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Veterinary Medicine College, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Mritunjay Kumar, GMERS Medical College, India.

(2) Celline Angel Sinaja, Tarumanagara University, Indonesia.

(3) Sudeep Kumar, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mritunjay Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Celline Angel Sinaja, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sudeep Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fang Xiang, Visiting Professor, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Faisal Khan, City University Ajman, United Arab Emirates.

(2) Emmanuel Thompson, Southeast Missouri State University, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Faisal Khan, United Arab Emirates) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Emmanuel Thompson, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Surendra Singh Bargali, DSB Campus, Kumaun University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Hafiz Muhammad Usman Abid, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Pakistan.

(2) Kopparthi Amrutha Valli Sindhura, ICAR-IIHR, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hafiz Muhammad Usman Abid, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kopparthi Amrutha Valli Sindhura, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nese Yilmaz, Associate Professor, Istanbul University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sylvester Richard Chikabvumbwa, Catholic University of Malawi, Malawi.

(2) Behnam Sadaghat, Tabriz University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sylvester Richard Chikabvumbwa, Malawi) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Behnam Sadaghat, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dennis Gamad Caballes, School of Teacher Education, Graduate Program School of Teacher Education (Formerly School of Advanced Studies), The National Teachers College, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Omer S. M. Jomah, The Libyan Academy for Postgraduate Studies, Libya.

(2) Ashish Samuel Huri, Ewing Christian College, University of Allahabad, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Omer S. M. Jomah, Libya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashish Samuel Huri, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chamari Hettiarachchi, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Reviewers:

(1) Gowtham K, PSG College of Arts & Science, India.

(2) Naila Riaz, University of Sargodha, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lucia Ramos, Federal University of Parana, Brazil.

(2) Maziar Naderi, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gowtham K, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Naila Riaz, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v3 | File 1 | NA