Peer Review History: Caffeine, Nicotine and Mdma Effects on the Brain Hippocampal Formation of Juvenile Experiential Models

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gyanesh Kumar Tiwari, Assistant Professor, Doctor Harisingh Gour Central University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Praveena Raman, Asan Memorial Dental College and Hospital, Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR Medical University, India.

(2) Eggadi Venkateshwarlu, Vaagdevi College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Anil Kumar Prajapati, L.M. College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Saravanakumar Kasimedu, Seven Hills College of Pharmacy(Autonomous), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.23/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Praveena Raman, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eggadi Venkateshwarlu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anil Kumar Prajapati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Giant Intraabdominal Desmoid Tumour of the Sigmoid Colon Mesentery

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Robert Meves, Santa Casa Scholl of Medicine, São Paulo University, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Fabian Ovidiu-Vasile, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

(2) Esmaeil Hajinasrollah, SBMU, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Than Than Htwe, University Kuala Lumpur – Royal College of Medicine (UniKL-RCMP), Malaysia.

(2) Afam-ezeaku chikaodili eziamaka, Nnamdi azikiwe university, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fabian Ovidiu-Vasile, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Esmaeil Hajinasrollah, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Socio-Economic Determinants of Awareness and Utilization of Millets and Its Value-added Products among Rural Consumers in Madurai District, Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Vasanthkumar SS, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Mouneshwari Ramanand Kammar, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mouneshwari Ramanand Kammar, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vasanthkumar SS, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mouneshwari Ramanand Kammar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effectiveness of Urea Fertilizer with Different Concentrations on T. chuii Culture on Laboratory Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jorge Castro Mejía, Xochimlco Metropolitan Autonomous University, Mexico.

(2) Dr. Tarang Kumar Shah, Assistant Professor, DGCN College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, India.

(3) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sufia Zaman, Techno India University, India.

(2) Fereidun Mohebbi, National Artemia Research Center, West Azarbaijan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ranjan Singh, dr. Rammanohar lohia avadh university, India.

(2) V.Jayapriya, Idhaya College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sufia Zaman, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fereidun Mohebbi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effect of Adding Em4 to Moist Pellets on the Growth and Survival of Snubnose Pompano (Trachinotus blochii)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pinar Oguzhan Yildiz, Assistant Professor, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Kamel Ibrahim El Hammady, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Egypt.

(2) P.O. Samuel, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmed Kamel Ibrahim El Hammady, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P. O. Samuel, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Relationship between Cancer Treatment Nutrition Related Side Effects and Nutrition Status among Adult Cancer Patients: A Case of Texas Cancer Center, Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lomas Kumar Tomar, Galway University Hospital, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.

Reviewers:

(1) Arun R Nair, Vinayaka Mission’s Homoeopathic Medical College, India.

(2) Amal Halim, Mansoura University, Egypt.

(3) Hayfa H. Hassani, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(4) Davinder Kaur, Gian Sagar College of Nursing, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arun R Nair, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amal Halim, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hayfa H. Hassani, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Davinder Kaur, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Novel Insecticides against Tobacco Caterpillar Spodoptera litura and Castor Semilooper Achaea janata of Castor

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emmanuel F. Nzunda, College of Forestry, Wildlife, and Tourism, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania.

(2) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

(3) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien (Retired), The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Wali Muhammad, Pakistan.

(2) Anand Choudhary, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wali Muhammad, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anand Choudhary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Journal_Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Validation of the Chemical Constituents of Crude Leaf Extract of Datura discolor with Qualitative Phytochemical Screening and GC-MS Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Elmarie Van Der Watt, University of the Free State, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Krishnappa, AVC College, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Atul N. Wagh, M.S.G College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Krishnappa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Atul N. Wagh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Microalbuminuria; Risk Predictive Tool and Determinant of Early Treatment in Diabetic Nephropathy

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Darko Nozic, Military Medical Academy, General hospital Acibadem Belmedic, Belgrade, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Masumi Kamiyama, Jumonji University, Japan.

(2) Ladli Kishore, Maharaja Agrasen University, India.

(3) Susovan Halder, Dr. Susovan Halder’s Clinic and Kasturi Medical Centre, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Masumi Kamiyama, Japan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ladli Kishore, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Susovan Halder, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Waterborne Zoonotic Diseases and Antimicrobial Resistance: Indian Policy and Onehealth Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. John Yahya I. Elshimali, UCLA School of Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Naser Korde Zedin, University of Technology, Iraq.

(2) Raghad Shubbar Jaafar, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(3) Muhamad R Abdel Hameed, Assiut University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Naser Korde Zedin, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Raghad Shubbar Jaafar, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Muhamad R Abdel Hameed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA