Peer Review History: Performance of Finger Millet Varieties (Eleusine coracana L.) in Different Establishment Methods

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ozdal Gokdal, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Çine Vocational School, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Le Quy Kha, Institute of Agricultural Sciences for Southern, Vietnam.

(2) Serhii Rieznik, State Biotechnological University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anil Pokhrel, Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Nepal.

(2) Rigoberto Fimia Duarte, University of Medical Sciences of Villa Clara (UCM-VC), Cuba.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Le Quy Kha, Vietnam) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Serhii Rieznik, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Review on Fern: A Fascinating Foliage

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Angelo Paone, Pusan National University, Republic of Korea.

Reviewers:

(1) Sulbha Vilas Kulkarni, Nagpur University, India.

(2) Jasmina D.Acharya, J.S.Ayurveda Mahavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sulbha Vilas Kulkarni, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jasmina D.Acharya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Boosting Cooperative Success: Evaluating the Performance of Farmer Producer Organizations in Tiruvallur District, Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Central Lab. for Research and Development of Date Palm, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Henrykus Sihaloho, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas, Indonesia.

(2) Geeta Singh, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, JNKVV, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Henrykus Sihaloho, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Geeta Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Journal change | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Usage of Mobile Phone Technologies of Agricultural Extension Services Utilized by Farmers

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Yogesh Kumar Agarwal, Maharaja Agrasen Himalayan Garhwal University, India.

(2) Micheal Vincent Abiodun, Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yogesh Kumar Agarwal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Micheal Vincent Abiodun, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Hydroponics Technique on Root Characteristics and Physiological Parameters in Chrysanthemum

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Shiv Kumar Sharma, CVAS, India.

(2) R.Jebakumar, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shiv Kumar Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Jebakumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Seasonal Incidence of Major Insect Pests in Relation to Abiotic Factors in Mustard

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Senior Staff Scientist & Principal researcher, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Sarwan Kumar, PAU, India.

(2) Samiran Patra, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sarwan Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samiran Patra, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Inspite of Initial Non-malignant Biopsies: The Critical Role of Multidisciplinary Evaluation and Repeat Biopsies

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sinan Ince, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Megha Agrawal, IIMS&R, India.

(2) Zay Soe, Management and Science University, Malaysia.

(3) Medhat Sengab, Benha University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Megha Agrawal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zay Soe, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Medhat Sengab, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Cultivating Tomorrow: A Review on Biostimulants and Their Transformative Role in Agriculture

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Alaa Hassan Al-Farttoosy, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(2) Bonface Manono, Colorado State University, United States of America.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alaa Hassan Al-Farttoosy, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bonface Manono, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Telemedicine: Benefits and Pitfalls

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Maged Refaat, Ain Shams University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) M.I. Mbah, Taraba State University, Nigeria.

(2) Mihai- Iacob Bențea, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine from Cluj-Napoca (USAMVCN), Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kereena Chukka, India.

(2) Malina Jordanova, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria.

(3) Monika Rathee, World Medical College of Sciences and Research, India.

(4) Tejeshwari, Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health Sciences (Rguhs), Rajarajeswari College Of Nursing, India.

(5) Abbas Jedariforoughi , South dakota state university , USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. I. Mbah, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mihai- Iacob Bențea, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Music Therapy 101 for Alzheimer’s Disease: A Review of Current Trends and Future Directions

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Antonio Mastino, University of Messina, Institute of Translational Pharmacology, Italy.

(2) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Alopoudi Aristi, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.

(2) Kerem Kemik, Dokuz Eylül University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alopoudi Aristi, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kerem Kemik, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA