Peer Review History: Enhancing Animal Nutrition and Sustainability: The Vital Role of Genetically Modified Crops in Animal Feeding

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fernando José Cebola Lidon, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Brijesh Kumar Ojha, NDVSU, India.

(2) Shumaila Taskeen, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (GADVASU), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Brijesh Kumar Ojha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shumaila Taskeen, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Standardization of Technology for Development, Physico-chemical properties, Organoleptic acceptability and Storage of Value Added Kiwi Fruit Squash (Actinidia deliciosa)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Khalfa Ali, Associate Professor, University of Ain Temouchent, Algeria.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Deepa, SVVU, India.

(2) Khan Chand, School of Agricultural Sciences, Nagaland University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Deepa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khan Chand, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Qualitative Assessment of Flours from Five Varieties of Yam in Benue State Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, Old Civil Hospital of Guadalajara “Fray Antonio Alcalde”, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Sudeshna Mondal, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(2) Chisom Adeoye, Federal College of Agriculture, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) OLADELE Waheed Olatunji, Lagos State University, Nigeria.

(2) Shinggu John Paul, University of South Carolina, United States of America.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sudeshna Mondal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chisom Adeoye, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluating the Impacts of Integrated Pest Management Techniques on Cotton Crop for Cost-effectiveness as Recommended by Dr. PDKV, Akola, Maharashtra, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dalong Guo, College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Henan University of Science and Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Khairunnisa Amreen, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, India.

(2) B. Prakash, Vels University, India.

(3) Shakir Ullah, Chinese Academy of Science, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rashmi Gupta, Chandigarh university, India.

(2) Gustavo Bich, National University Of Misiones, Argentina.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khairunnisa Amreen, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B. Prakash, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shakir Ullah, China) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Natural Solutions: Botanical Approaches for Controlling Early Blight in Tomato Plants under Laboratory Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bishun Deo Prasad, Assistant Professor, Bihar Agriculture College, Sabour, Bihar Agricultural University, Bihar, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Essome Sale Charles, University of Yaounde 1, Cameroon.

(2) Natalija Atanasova-Pancevska, University St. Cyril and Methodius, North Macedonia.

(3) Munzer Sulyman Tamouz, Tishreen University, Syria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Tahir Mahmood, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Essome Sale Charles, Cameroon) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Natalija Atanasova-Pancevska, North Macedonia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Munzer Sulyman Tamouz, Syria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Collection Efficiency of Fresh Pollen under Different Pollen Trapping Frequencies by Apis mellifera L. Colonies in Mustard

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maria Serrano, EPSO, University Miguel Hernandez, Orihuela, Alicante, Spain.

(2) Dr. Khalfa Ali, Associate Professor, University of Ain Temouchent, Algeria.

Reviewers:

(1) Fatemeh Aghaei, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran.

(2) Bryan Glomel S. Silverio, University of the Philippines, Philippines.

(3) Pharaon Mbianda Auguste, The University of Douala, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fatemeh Aghaei, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bryan Glomel S. Silverio, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pharaon Mbianda Auguste, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Polynomial Time Linear Programs for Hard Constraint Satisfaction Problems

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Xingting Wang, Assistant Professor, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Kalaiarasi, Bharathidasan University, India.

(2) M. Rhifky Wayahdi, Battuta University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aleksandar Takači, University of Novi Sad, Serbia.

(2) Manikandan S, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(3) Sajja Tulasi Krishna, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Kalaiarasi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Rhifky Wayahdi, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Towards Effective Healthcare Delivery: An Assessment of Public Perception of Pharmacist’s Role in Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jinyong Peng, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Rahul Pal, Desh Bhagat University, India.

(2) Saleh Ahmed Jalal Siam, American International University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashok Kumar, Jagannath University, India.

(2) Vichapat Tharanon, Mahidol University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rahul Pal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saleh Ahmed Jalal Siam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Continuous Erlang Mixtures and their Relation to Exponential Mixtures and Poisson Mixtures

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jaya Bishwal, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Yuvarani, Auxilium College, India.

(2) Nemani. Subadra, Geethanjali College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(3) Mohamed. S. Hamed, Gulf Colleges, KSA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.73/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Yuvarani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nemani. Subadra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohamed. S. Hamed, KSA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Three-Parameters Gumbel Distribution: Properties and Application

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

(2) Dr. S. M. Aqil Burney, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

(3) Prof. Emeritus Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira, Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Vincent Raja Anthonisamy, University of Guyana, India.

(2) Amaury de Souza, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.

(3) Fasna K, University of Calicut, India.

(4) Jaber Kazempoor, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Doaa Abd khalil Elhertaniy, University of the Holy Quran and Taseel of Science, Sudan.

(2) Kanak Modi, Amity University Rajasthan, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 5.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vincent Raja Anthonisamy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amaury de Souza, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Fasna K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Jaber Kazempoor, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (Vincent Raja Anthonisamy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Amaury de Souza, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_3_v1 (Fasna K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_4_v1 (Jaber Kazempoor, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v2 (Vincent Raja Anthonisamy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v3 (Vincent Raja Anthonisamy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v4_and_Feedback_v4 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA