Peer Review History: Changes in Indigenous Paddy/Rice Marketing Channel Structure: An Evidence from Two Districts of Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rehenuma Tabassum, Associate Professor & Chairman, Sylhet Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Kousik Boro, Bodoland University, India.

(2) Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Centro Universitário Vale do Cricaré, Brazil.

(3) Yiming He, South China University of Technology, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chanate Ratanaubol, Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kousik Boro, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Yiming He, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploration of Antioxidant, Antibacterial, and Alpha-glucosidase Inhibition Potential of Cirsium verutum (D. Don) Spreng Extracts: In vitro and in silico Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Endang Tri Wahyuni, Gadhah Mada University, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Flyndon Mark S. Dagalea, University of Eastern Philippines, Philippines.

(2) Agnes Nandutu Masawi, Makerere University, Ugnada.

(3) Rupali Likhar, University of Mumbai, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Avinash Singh, AIIMS Patna, India.

(2) Hassan Shora, Port-Said university, Egypt.

(3) Mamatha B Patil, RRMCH, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Flyndon Mark S. Dagalea, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Agnes Nandutu Masawi, Ugnada) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rupali Likhar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis of the Consequences of a Mixture of Micronutrients on the Parameters Associated with Wheat Growth and Yield

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Khalfa Ali, Associate Professor, University of Ain Temouchent, Algeria.

Reviewers:

(1) Apu Biswas, Bangladesh Tea Research Institute, Bangladesh.

(2) Kehinde R. Adebayo, Kwara State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Apu Biswas, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kehinde R. Adebayo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Social and Economic Consequences of Agriculture Crises: A Study of Farm Labour in Punjab, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Mgbasonwu Vincent Nwabinye, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Nigeria.

(2) Margarita Išoraitė, Vilniaus Kolegija, Lithuania.

(3) Maria Daniela Chavez Clemente, National Institute for Agricultural Technology, Argentina.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Poulami Ray, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mgbasonwu Vincent Nwabinye, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Margarita Išoraitė, Lithuania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Maria Daniela Chavez Clemente, Argentina) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Dissemination of Agricultural Technology and Constraints Analysis in Paddy-Wheat Residue Management in Punjab, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wang Guangjun, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Florin Sala, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timisoara, Romania.

(2) Lakshmi Dhar Hatai, Central Agricultural University, Pasighat, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bidhan Nath, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Florin Sala, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lakshmi Dhar Hatai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economic Analysis of Pea Farming in High Hills of Himachal Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wang Guangjun, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Mummasani Asritha, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Zafar Iqbal Khan, University of Sargodha, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kalu Udo Emeruche, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mummasani Asritha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zafar Iqbal Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Does Upper Arm Length, Arm Span, and Foot Length Serve as Good Predictors for Stature? A Cross-Sectional Study among Northern Nigerians

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Ender Durualp, Ankara University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Jitendra Patel, Gmers Medical College, India.

(2) Sahar Youssef, Al-Azhar University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jitendra Patel, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sahar Youssef, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: From Soil to Oil: The Crucial Roles of Potassium and Sulphur in Enhancing Oilseed Crop Quality

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Zahra Shirmohammadi, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Iran.

(2) Alifia Hamzah Johari, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zahra Shirmohammadi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alifia Hamzah Johari, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Case Report on Challenges in Retrieving an Ingested Mobile Phone

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Mukesh Pancholi, Medical College Baroda, India.

(2) Leticia Rosevics, Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná, Brazil.

(3) Abeer Shaker Elmoursy Ali, Umm Al Qurra University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B. N. Mishra, Manipal Hospital, India.

(2) VK Nigam, Max Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.84/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mukesh Pancholi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Leticia Rosevics, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abeer Shaker Elmoursy Ali, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Determining the Effect of Rooting Media and Different Polythene Wrappers on Air Layering of Grape Fruit (Citrus paradisi)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dalong Guo, College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Henan University of Science and Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Rabie Zeinah, Syria.

(2) Sujata Gupta, D.A.V. (P.G.) College, India.

(3) K Baskaran, Vels Medical College and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amit Ashok Chhatre, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rabie Zeinah, Syria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sujata Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (K Baskaran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA