Peer Review History: Unveiling T-Cell Prolymphocytic Leukaemia: A Comprehensive Case Study on Diagnostic Markers and Challenges

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lomas Kumar Tomar, Galway University Hospital, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.

Reviewers:

(1) Nibras Saleam Al-Ammar, University of Basrah, College of Medicine, Iraq.

(2) May Mohammed Ali Hussen, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Sudan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhilash Venunathan, Kerala University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) K.V.Sreedhara Babu, Sri Venkateswara Institute Of Medical Sciences, India.

(3) Marvis Ayoola Arowolo, University of Missouri, Usa.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nibras Saleam Al-Ammar, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (May Mohammed Ali Hussen, Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Nitrogen Levels and Nano Urea on Yield and Economics of Wheat under Mid Hills of Himachal Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Salih Kadhum Alwan Alsharifi, AlQasim Green University, Iraq.

(2) Merve Bayhan, Dicle University, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Garima Pathak, B.D. College, Patliputra University, India.

(2) Harmanpreet Singh, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(3) Md. Shahadat Hossain Khan, Hajee Md. Danesh Science and Technology University, Bangladesh.

(4) Midde Sai Kumar, School of agricultural sciences, Malla Reddy university, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Salih Kadhum Alwan Alsharifi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Merve Bayhan, Turkiye) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Clinicians’ Preferences and Perceptions of Iron Supplementation in the Treatment of Anemia in Indian Settings: Emphasis on Liposomal Iron Formulations

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Darko Nozic, Military Medical Academy, General Hospital Acibadem Belmedic, Belgrade, Serbia.

(2) Dr. Gehad Abdel Rahman El Nakib, Hospital Pharmacist, Mansoura University Hospital, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Hawraa Hamid Naji, Al- Qasim Green University, Iraq.

(2) Mathanki Sutharsan, University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

Mathanki Sutharsan, University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka.

(1) P Ravichandran, Saveetha Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hawraa Hamid Naji, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mathanki Sutharsan, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Uterine Torsion: A Rare Obstetric Emergency

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Erich Cosmi, Chair Director, University of Padua, School of Medicine, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Akshita Rattan, Adesh Medical College and Hospital, India.

(2) Kiranitha, MGR Medical University, India.

(3) Kamil Mosa Fram, The University of Jordan, Jordan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Akshita Rattan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kiranitha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kamil Mosa Fram, Jordan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Strangulated Trans Epiploic Hernia: A Rare Case Report and Review of Literature

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Robert Meves, Santa Casa Scholl of Medicine, São Paulo University, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Hossein Hemmati, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Islamic Republic of Iran.

(2) KM Sweta, RGUHS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hossein Hemmati, Islamic Republic of Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (KM Sweta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Employee Attrition Prediction Based on Gradient Boosting Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, AssistantProfessor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

(2) Prof. G. Sudheer, GVP College of Engineering for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Pooja Tripathi, Inderprastha Engg College, India.

(2) Ankit Bansal, University of Cincinnati, United Sates America.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jacksan Judan Fernandes, Goa University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pooja Tripathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ankit Bansal, United Sates America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Variability Studies in Soybean Genotypes under Different Water Regimes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Tenured Associate Professor, Government College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Achmad Yozar Perkasa, Bogor Agricultural University, Indonesia.

(2) Swastika Bhandari, Tribhuwan University,Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science(IAAS), Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Achmad Yozar Perkasa, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Swastika Bhandari, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biochemical Analysis of Cerebrospinal Fluid in Paediatric Patients: Insights from a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA And Associate Professor, University of Mississipi Medical Center, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Abul Kalam Mohammed Shoab, Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh.

(2) Ambrishkumar Dayashankar Mishra, Muhs Medical University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abul Kalam Mohammed Shoab, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ambrishkumar Dayashankar Mishra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Investigating Rainfall Patterns in South Singhbhum: A Non-parametric Approach Utilizing Mann-Kendall Tests and Sen’s Slope Estimator

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Yu Huan, Chengdu University of Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Shrinwantu Raha, Bhairab Ganguly College, India.

(2) Karno Kumar  Mondal, Khulna University of Engineering & Technology, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Salisu Lawal Halliru, Federal University of Education Kano, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shrinwantu Raha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Karno Kumar Mondal, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Issues that Parents of Learners with Physical Challenges Encounter in Providing Social Support to Their Children in Inclusive Schools in Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Thabang John Mtimcolo Hloele, Lesotho.

(2) Enock Panganayi Mawuye, University of Rwanda, Zimbabwe.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Thabang John Mtimcolo Hloele, Lesotho) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Enock Panganayi Mawuye, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA