Peer Review History: Solving the Problem of Source of Electron Spin Magnetic Moment

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lei Zhang, Winston Salem State University, USA.

(2) Prof. Thomas F. George, Chancellor Emeritus, University of Missouri-St. Louis, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Le Ngoc Long, School of Engineering and Technology, Tra Vinh University, Vietnam.

(2) Christopher Oluwatobi Adeogun, South China University of Technology, China.

(3) Radhiyah Mahdi Shaker Al Jarrah, Kufa University, Iraq.

(4) Wang Yang, School of Electronic Information Engineering, Beihang University, China.

(5) Anwar Al- Mofleh, Al Balqa Applied University, Jordan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sangay Wangchuk, Khangkhu MSS, Bhutan.

(2) Chandramouli Sarkar, India.

(3) Wellingtone Kibande, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Le Ngoc Long, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Christopher Oluwatobi Adeogun, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Radhiyah Mahdi Shaker Al Jarrah, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Wang Yang, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Anwar Al- Mofleh, Jordan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Environmental Health Impact Assessments and Eco-modernity of Sukinda Chromite Ultramafic Belt, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt And Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Venkateswara Rao, Swarnandhra College of Engineering & Technology, JNTUK, India.

(2) Sanu Dolui, The University of Burdwan, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aditi Bisht, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Venkateswara Rao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanu Dolui, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Agro-morphological Characterization of Maize (Zea mays L.) Landraces from Tribal Regions of Kashmir

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent SON,  School of Silifke, Mersin University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Kushanova Rystay, Kazakhstan.

(2) Harendra Verma, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Nagaland Centre, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kushanova Rystay, Kazakhstan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Harendra Verma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of New Herbicides on Weed Population and Weed Control Efficiency in Scented and Hybrid Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Sameh Shaban Abdelaty Hamouda, Alazhar University, Egypt.

(2) Salam M A, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sameh Shaban Abdelaty Hamouda, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Salam M A, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Studies on Organoleptic Evaluation of Aonla (Emblica officinalis G.) Squash during Storage

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Gezalyn Anne V. Cajayon, Philippines.

(2) Uasley Caldas de Oliveira, State University of Mato Grosso, Brazil.

(3) Akinlolu Bankole Fawehinmi, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Cisse Hama, Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Burkina Faso.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gezalyn Anne V. Cajayon, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Uasley Caldas de Oliveira, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Akinlolu Bankole Fawehinmi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluating the Influence of Sewage Pollution on Pond Water Quality and Ecosystem Health

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rajkumar Venkatesh Raikar, KLE Dr. M. S. Sheshgiri College of Engineering and Technology, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) M Wanlambok Sanglyne, Bio-Resources Development Centre, India.

(2) Flyndon Mark S. Dagalea, University Of Eastern Philippines, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M Wanlambok Sanglyne, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Flyndon Mark S. Dagalea, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Approach to Anti-Diabetic Potential of Putranjiva roxburghii Wall Leaves by In vitro Models

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Randa Salah Juma Mahmoud, University of Zagazig, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Tri Wiyono, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia.

(2) Sushama Sumeet Shivgankar, India.

(3) Rama Shnkar, Patanjali Research Foundation, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tri Wiyono, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sushama Sumeet Shivgankar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rama Shnkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Analysis of Analytical Method Validation Requirements Across ICH, USP, ChP and ANVISA: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Begum Rokeya, Head, Bangladesh University of Health Sciences, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Faraat Ali, Botswana Medicines Regulatory Authority (BoMRA), Botswana.

(2) Priyam Jyoti Das, Assam Down Town University, India.

(3) Aysha Akhter Mim, Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jarin Tasnim Meeti, University of Scholars, Bangladesh.

(2) Balamurugan Krishnamurthy, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Faraat Ali, Botswana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Priyam Jyoti Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Aysha Akhter Mim, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An In-Depth Review on Recent Developments in Oral Ketoprofen Delivery: Strategies for Enhanced Therapeutic Performance

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wenbin Zeng, Central South University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Razi Ullah Khan, The Superior University Lahore, Pakistan.

(2) Bhupinder Kaur, University Institute of Pharma Sciences, Chandigarh University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Razi Ullah Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bhupinder Kaur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Performance of Training Executive Agencies in Tanzania: Do Skills and Skill-based Organizational Strategies Matter?

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Veronica Mîndrescu, Associate Professor, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Revenio Jalagat, Jr., Al Zahra College for Women, Oman.

(2) Elizabeth Taiwo Olatunji, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Revenio Jalagat, Jr., Oman) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Elizabeth Taiwo Olatunji, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA